J Korean Med Assoc.  2018 Jul;61(7):392-402. 10.5124/jkma.2018.61.7.392.

Penal provisions of Bioethics Law: problems and improvements

• Ha TY

• KMID: 2416409
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2018.61.7.392

Abstract

Chapter 9 of the Bioethics Law has several problems due to strict research standards and strong penalties. Therefore, biomedical researchers in Korea have raised several objections to this Law. To make matters worse, the normative power of the Law is significantly diminished because norms and penalties are divergent. Articles 2, 24, 26, 27, 28, and 32 of the Law require amendment because the current regulations on sperm retrieval, sperm management, and sperm use are insufficient. At a minimum, legislation for artificial insemination and in vitro fertilization should be consolidated. It is also necessary for sperm researchers and donors to be notified of their rights and duties. Section 9 of the Bioethics Law should therefore be amended. In particular, its legal formulation should be modified in order to enhance the effectiveness of bioethics law. This is in accord with the spirit of the Constitution. The principle of proportionality should be maintained. The statutory form should be revised to the level of abortion. Not only are the actors in embryo research diverse, including medical personnel, medical institutions, donors, veterans, and mediators, but embryo research involves multiple behavioral aspects, including intentional acts and negligence (violation of state duty). Excessively free-form activity is prescribed. Although the value of life is important, heavy punishment violates human dignity and human values. This legislation should not reflect to be grounded in emotional reactions such as anger.

Keyword

Bioethics Law; Punishment; Sperm; Egg cell; Embryo

MeSH Terms

Anger
Bioethics*
Constitution and Bylaws
Embryo Research
Embryonic Structures
Fertilization in Vitro
Humans
Insemination, Artificial
Jurisprudence*
Korea
Malpractice
Personhood
Punishment
Social Control, Formal
Sperm Retrieval
Spermatozoa
Tissue Donors
Value of Life
Veterans

Reference

1. Park EJ. Law and ethics from the age of biotechnology. Seoul: Ewha Womans University Press;2001.

2. Lee IY. Based on the legal rules and regulatory arguments on life ethics and safety. Yonsei Law Rev. 2005; 1:107–159.

3. Some amendments to the Bioethics and Biosafety Law of 2017. No. 15188. 2017. 12. 12.

4. Ha TY. Bioethics Law. Seoul: Hengin Publishing;2018.

5. Choi KS. Bioethics and ‘bioethics and law’: an academic identity and future of interdisciplinary bioethics in a pluralistic society. Ewha Law J. 2012; 17:241–260.

6. Kim HC, Ko BJ, Park JS, Choi KS. Bioethics Law. Seoul: Park Young Sa;2014.

7. Hyun SH, Lee MG. Who analyzed the process of legislation of the ethics law through game theory. Natl Assembly J. 2015; 2:137–159.

8. Choi KS. Bioethics and philosophy: philosophical conflicts and philosophy's tasks for a new bioethics. J Korean Bioethics Assoc. 2013; 2:15–28.

9. Lee IY. Discussion about the morality and legality between bioetics and the law. J Korean Bioethics Assoc. 2011; 1:87–109.