Tuberc Respir Dis.  2018 Jul;81(3):241-246. 10.4046/trd.2017.0043.

Tuberculosis Relief Belt Supporting Project (Tuberculosis Patient Management Project for Poverty Group)

• Kim JK
• Jeong I
• Lee JY
• Kim JH
• Han AY
• Kim SY
• Joh JS

• KMID: 2414567
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2017.0043

Abstract

BACKGROUND
The "Tuberculosis Relief Belt Supporting Project (Tuberculosis Patient Management Project for Poverty Groups)" is a national program for socioeconomically vulnerable tuberculosis (TB) patients. We sought to evaluate the clinical and socioeconomic characteristics of poverty-stricken TB patients, and determined the need for relief.
METHODS
We examined in-patients with TB, who were supported by this project at the National Medical Center from 2014 to 2015. We retrospectively investigated the patients' socioeconomic status, clinical characteristics, and project expenditures.
RESULTS
Fifty-eight patients were enrolled. Among 55 patients with known income status, 24 (43.6%) had no income. Most patients (80%) lived alone. A total of 48 patients (82.8%) had more than one underlying disease. More than half of the enrolled patients (30 patients, 51.7%) had smear-positive TB. Cavitary disease was found in 38 patients (65.5%). Among the 38 patients with known resistance status, 19 (50%) had drug-resistant TB. In terms of disease severity, 96.6% of the cases had moderate-to-severe disease. A total of 14 patients (26.4%) died during treatment. Nursing expenses were supported for 12 patients (20.7%), with patient transportation costs reimbursed for 35 patients (60%). In terms of treatment expenses for 31 people (53.4%), 93.5% of them were supported by uninsured benefits.
CONCLUSION
Underlying disease, infectivity, drug resistance, severity, and death occurred frequently in socioeconomically vulnerable patients with TB. Many uninsured treatment costs were not supported by the current government TB programs, and the "Tuberculosis Relief Belt Supporting Project" compensated for these limitations.

Keyword

Poverty; Tuberculosis

MeSH Terms

Drug Resistance
Health Care Costs
Health Expenditures
Humans
Medically Uninsured
Nursing
Poverty*
Retrospective Studies
Social Class
Transportation
Tuberculosis*

Reference

1. Global tuberculosis report 2015. WHO/HTM/TB/2015.22 [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization;2015. cited 2017 May 5. Available from: http://www.who.int/tb/publications/global_report/en.

2. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Infectious disease surveillance yearbook, 2015 [Internet]. Cheongju: Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention;2016. cited 2017 May 5. Available from: http://cdc.go.kr/CDC/info/CdcKrInfo0302.jsp?menuIds=HOME001-MNU1132-MNU1138-MNU0038&fid=32&q_type=&q_value=&cid=69386&pageNum=.

3. Kim HJ. Current situation of tuberculosis and its control in Korea. J Korean Med Assoc. 2006; 49:762–772.

4. Hong YP, Kim SJ, Lew WJ, Lee EK, Han YC. The seventh nationwide tuberculosis prevalence survey in Korea, 1995. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1998; 2:27–36. PMID: 9562108.

5. Kim JH, Yim JJ. Achievements in and challenges of tuberculosis control in South Korea. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015; 21:1913–1920. PMID: 26485188.

6. Park WS, Kang HY, Kim SJ, Cha JO, Son HJ, Park O. Notified tuberculosis status in Korea, 2015 [Internet]. Cheongju: Korean Center for Disease Control and Prevention;2016. cited 2017 May 5. Available from: http://cdc.go.kr/CDC/info/CdcKrInfo0301.jsp?menuIds=HOME001-MNU1154-MNU0005-MNU0037&cid=68059.

7. Cantwell MF, McKenna MT, McCray E, Onorato IM. Tuberculosis and race/ethnicity in the United States: impact of socioeconomic status. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998; 157(4 Pt 1):1016–1020. PMID: 9563713.

8. National Tuberculosis Association. Diagnostic standards and classification of tuberculosis. New York: National Tuberculosis Association;1961.

9. Asch S, Leake B, Knowles L, Gelberg L. Tuberculosis in homeless patients: potential for case finding in public emergency departments. Ann Emerg Med. 1998; 32:144–147. PMID: 9701295.

10. Prevalence of pulmonary tuberculosis and latent tuberculosis infection in homeless people [Internet]. Cheongju: Korean Center for Disease Control and Prevention;2009. cited 2017 May 5. Available from: http://cdc.go.kr/CDC/notice/CdcKrInfo0201.jsp?menuIds=HOME001-MNU1154-MNU0005-MNU1889&cid=1523.

11. Park JS. Increasing the treatment success rate of tuberculosis in a private hospital through Public-Private Mix (PPM) Project. Tuberc Respir Dis. 2011; 70:143–149.

12. Reichman LB, O'Day R. Tuberculous infection in a large urban population. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1978; 117:705–712. PMID: 646222.

13. Gupta D, Das K, Balamughesh T, Aggarwal AN, Jindal SK. Role of socio-economic factors in tuberculosis prevalence. Indian J Tuberc. 2004; 51:27–31.

14. Lofy KH, McElroy PD, Lake L, Cowan LS, Diem LA, Goldberg SV, et al. Outbreak of tuberculosis in a homeless population involving multiple sites of transmission. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2006; 10:683–689. PMID: 16776457.

15. Belo MT, Luiz RR, Teixeira EG, Hanson C, Trajman A. Tuberculosis treatment outcomes and socio-economic status: a prospective study in Duque de Caxias, Brazil. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2011; 15:978–981. PMID: 21682975.

16. Newsletters for tuberculosis management, No. 2016-3 [Internet]. Cheongju: Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention;2016. cited 2017 May 5. Available from: http://tbzero.cdc.go.kr/tbzero/board/boardView.do.