J Gastric Cancer.  2018 Mar;18(1):30-36. 10.5230/jgc.2018.18.e6.

Safety of Laparoscopic Sentinel Basin Dissection in Patients with Gastric Cancer: an Analysis from the SENORITA Prospective Multicenter Quality Control Trial

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 2Department of Surgery, Dongnam Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Cancer Center, Busan, Korea. mdoogy@naver.com
  • 3Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Korea.
  • 4Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Gyeongsang National University, Changwon, Korea.
  • 5Department of Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
  • 6Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 7Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea.
  • 8Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Korea.
  • 9Gastric Cancer Center, Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea.
  • 10Center of Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
We investigated complications after laparoscopic sentinel basin dissection (SBD) for patients with gastric cancer who were enrolled in a quality control study, prior to the phase III trial of sentinel lymph node navigation surgery (SNNS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We analyzed prospective data from a Korean multicenter prerequisite quality control trial of laparoscopic SBD for gastric cancer and assessed procedure-related and surgical complications. All complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo Classification (CDC) system and were compared with the results of the previously published SNNS trial.
RESULTS
Among the 108 eligible patients who were enrolled in the quality control trial, 8 (7.4%) experienced complications during the early postoperative period. One patient with gastric resection-related duodenal stump leakage recovered after percutaneous drainage (grade IIIa in CDC). The other postoperative complications were mild and patients recovered with supportive care. No complications were directly related to the laparoscopic SBD procedure or tracer usage, and there were no mortalities. The laparoscopic SBD complication rates and patterns that were observed in this study were comparable to those of a previously reported trial.
CONCLUSIONS
The results of our prospective, multicenter quality control trial demonstrate that laparoscopic SBD is a safe procedure during SNNS for gastric cancer.

Keyword

Stomach neoplasms; Sentinel lymph node biopsy; Postoperative complication

MeSH Terms

Classification
Drainage
Humans
Lymph Nodes
Mortality
Postoperative Complications
Postoperative Period
Prospective Studies*
Quality Control*
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
Stomach Neoplasms*

Figure

  • Fig. 1 The steps of laparoscopic SBD. (A) Endoscopic injection of Tc99m-HSA with ICG and a laparoscopic view after tracer injection. (B) Laparoscopic sentinel basin node detection along the greater and lesser curvatures of the stomach. (C) Surgical clip application for marking the extent of laparoscopic SBD in the greater and lesser curvatures of the stomach. (D) Laparoscopic SBD along the greater and lesser curvatures of the stomach. (E) Completion of laparoscopic SBD along the greater and lesser curvatures of the stomach.SBD = sentinel basin dissection; ICG = indocyanine green.


Reference

1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015; 136:E359–E386. PMID: 25220842.
Article
2. Miyashiro I, Hiratsuka M, Sasako M, Sano T, Mizusawa J, Nakamura K, et al. High false-negative proportion of intraoperative histological examination as a serious problem for clinical application of sentinel node biopsy for early gastric cancer: final results of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group multicenter trial JCOG0302. Gastric Cancer. 2014; 17:316–323. PMID: 23933782.
Article
3. Lee JH, Lee HJ, Kong SH, Park DJ, Lee HS, Kim WH, et al. Analysis of the lymphatic stream to predict sentinel nodes in gastric cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014; 21:1090–1098. PMID: 24276637.
Article
4. Kitagawa Y, Takeuchi H, Takagi Y, Natsugoe S, Terashima M, Murakami N, et al. Sentinel node mapping for gastric cancer: a prospective multicenter trial in Japan. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31:3704–3710. PMID: 24019550.
Article
5. Lee YJ, Jeong SH, Hur H, Han SU, Min JS, An JY, et al. Prospective multicenter feasibility study of laparoscopic sentinel basin dissection for organ preserving surgery in gastric cancer: quality control study for surgical standardization prior to phase III trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015; 94:e1894. PMID: 26512607.
6. Lee JH, Ryu KW, Lee SE, Cho SJ, Lee JY, Kim CG, et al. Learning curve for identification of sentinel lymph node based on a cumulative sum analysis in gastric cancer. Dig Surg. 2009; 26:465–470. PMID: 20068318.
Article
7. An JY, Min JS, Lee YJ, Jeong SH, Hur H, Han SU, et al. Which factors are important for successful sentinel node navigation surgery in gastric cancer patients? Analysis from the SENORITA prospective multicenter feasibility quality control trial. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2017; 2017:1732571. PMID: 28706535.
Article
8. Washington K.7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: stomach. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010; 17:3077–3079. PMID: 20882416.
Article
9. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer. 2011; 14:113–123. PMID: 21573742.
10. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer. 2011; 14:101–112. PMID: 21573743.
11. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004; 240:205–213. PMID: 15273542.
12. Kinami S, Fujimura T, Ojima E, Fushida S, Ojima T, Funaki H, et al. PTD classification: proposal for a new classification of gastric cancer location based on physiological lymphatic flow. Int J Clin Oncol. 2008; 13:320–329. PMID: 18704632.
Article
13. Miwa K, Kinami S, Taniguchi K, Fushida S, Fujimura T, Nonomura A. Mapping sentinel nodes in patients with early-stage gastric carcinoma. Br J Surg. 2003; 90:178–182. PMID: 12555293.
Article
14. Lee YJ, Ha WS, Park ST, Choi SK, Hong SC, Park JW. Which biopsy method is more suitable between a basin dissection and pick-up biopsy for sentinel nodes in laparoscopic sentinel-node navigation surgery (LSNNS) for gastric cancer? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2008; 18:357–363. PMID: 18503367.
Article
15. Reinhart MB, Huntington CR, Blair LJ, Heniford BT, Augenstein VA. Indocyanine green: historical context, current applications, and future considerations. Surg Innov. 2016; 23:166–175. PMID: 26359355.
16. Song YS, Lee JW, Lee HY, Kim SK, Kang KW, Kook MC, et al. Quantitative assessment of the radiation exposure during pathologic process in the sentinel lymph node biopsy using radioactive colloid. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007; 41:309–316.
17. Miyashiro I, Miyoshi N, Hiratsuka M, Kishi K, Yamada T, Ohue M, et al. Detection of sentinel node in gastric cancer surgery by indocyanine green fluorescence imaging: comparison with infrared imaging. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008; 15:1640–1643. PMID: 18379850.
Article
18. Tajima Y, Yamazaki K, Masuda Y, Kato M, Yasuda D, Aoki T, et al. Sentinel node mapping guided by indocyanine green fluorescence imaging in gastric cancer. Ann Surg. 2009; 249:58–62. PMID: 19106676.
Article
19. Kim HH, Hyung WJ, Cho GS, Kim MC, Han SU, Kim W, et al. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an interim report-a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized Trial (KLASS Trial). Ann Surg. 2010; 251:417–420. PMID: 20160637.
20. Kitano S, Shiraishi N, Uyama I, Sugihara K, Tanigawa N. A multicenter study on oncologic outcome of laparoscopic gastrectomy for early cancer in Japan. Ann Surg. 2007; 245:68–72. PMID: 17197967.
Article
21. Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Hyung WJ, Kim W, Lee HJ, et al. Long-term results of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a large-scale case-control and case-matched Korean multicenter study. J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32:627–633. PMID: 24470012.
Article
22. Park JY, Kim YW, Ryu KW, Nam BH, Lee YJ, Jeong SH, et al. Assessment of laparoscopic stomach preserving surgery with sentinel basin dissection versus standard gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy in early gastric cancer-a multicenter randomized phase III clinical trial (SENORITA trial) protocol. BMC Cancer. 2016; 16:340. PMID: 27246120.
Article
23. Ryu KW. Multicenter phase III trial of laparoscopic sentinel node biopsy and stomach preserving surgery in early gastric cancer [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Institutes of Health;2013. cited 2017 Feb 5. Available from: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01804998.
Full Text Links
  • JGC
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr