J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg.  2018 Apr;44(2):73-78. 10.5125/jkaoms.2018.44.2.73.

Complications of the retromandibular transparotid approach for low condylar neck and subcondylar fractures: a retrospective study

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, ETZ Hospitals, Tilburg, The Netherlands. jeroen@vanhevele.be

Abstract


OBJECTIVES
The goal of this study was to evaluate the rates of complications, morbidity, and safety with the transparotid approach.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A retrospective study was conducted and consisted of 53 surgically treated patients in the past five years for low condylar neck and subcondylar fractures. Only patients with malocclusion and who underwent open reduction with internal fixation with the retromandibular transparotid approach were included. The examined parameters were postoperative suboptimal occlusion, deflection, saliva fistula, and facial nerve weakness.
RESULTS
Fifty-three patients had an open reduction with internal fixation on 55 sides (41 males, 77.4%; mean age, 42 years [range, 18-72 years]). Four patients (7.5%) experienced transient facial nerve weakness of the marginal mandibular branch, but none was permanent. Four patients had a salivary fistula, and 5 patients showed postoperative malocclusion, where one needed repeat surgery after one year. One patient showed long-term deflection. No other complications were observed.
CONCLUSION
The retromandibular transparotid approach is a safe procedure for open reduction and internal fixation of low condylar neck and subcondylar fractures, and it has minimal complications.

Keyword

Maxillofacial surgery; Mandibular fractures; Open fracture reduction; Parotid gland

MeSH Terms

Facial Nerve
Fistula
Humans
Male
Malocclusion
Mandibular Fractures
Neck*
Parotid Gland
Reoperation
Retrospective Studies*
Saliva
Surgery, Oral

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Vertical incision line of 2 cm, parallel to the posterior border of the mandible.

  • Fig. 2 Exposure of the fracture site by placing the reversed retractor behind the posterior border of the mandible.

  • Fig. 3 Preoperative computed tomography image of bilateral subcondylar fracture in patient who needed new intervention one year after fracture management.

  • Fig. 4 Postoperative cone-beam computed tomography image of the restored right subcondylar fracture by one 2.0 mm miniplate in the same patient who needed new surgery one year after initial surgery.


Cited by  1 articles

Direct transparotid approach via a modified mini-preauricular incision for open reduction and internal fixation of subcondylar fractures
Jung-Soo Lee, Sang-Hoon Kang
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021;47(4):327-334.    doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2021.47.4.327.


Reference

1. Bos RR, Ward Booth RP, de Bont LG. Mandibular condyle fractures: a consensus. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999; 37:87–89. PMID: 10371306.
2. Ellis E 3rd, Moos KF, el-Attar A. Ten years of mandibular fractures: an analysis of 2,137 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1985; 59:120–129. PMID: 3856795.
Article
3. Worsaae N, Thorn JJ. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of unilateral dislocated low subcondylar fractures: a clinical study of 52 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994; 52:353–360. discussion 360-1. PMID: 8133366.
Article
4. Brandt MT, Haug RH. Open versus closed reduction of adult mandibular condyle fractures: a review of the literature regarding the evolution of current thoughts on management. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003; 61:1324–1332. PMID: 14613090.
Article
5. Palmieri C, Ellis E 3rd, Throckmorton G. Mandibular motion after closed and open treatment of unilateral mandibular condylar process fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999; 57:764–775. discussion 775-6. PMID: 10416622.
Article
6. Croce A, Moretti A, Vitullo F, Castriotta A, Rosa de M, Citraro L. Transparotid approach for mandibular condylar neck and subcondylar fractures. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2010; 30:303–309. PMID: 21808452.
7. Hackenberg B, Lee C, Caterson EJ. Management of subcondylar mandible fractures in the adult patient. J Craniofac Surg. 2014; 25:166–171. PMID: 24406572.
Article
8. Kellman RM, Cienfuegos R. Endoscopic approaches to subcondylar fractures of the mandible. Facial Plast Surg. 2009; 25:23–28. PMID: 19206025.
Article
9. Schubert W, Jenabzadeh K. Endoscopic approach to maxillofacial trauma. J Craniofac Surg. 2009; 20:154–156. PMID: 19165014.
Article
10. Zide MF, Kent JN. Indications for open reduction of mandibular condyle fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1983; 41:89–98. PMID: 6571887.
Article
11. Bouchard C, Perreault MH. Postoperative complications associated with the retromandibular approach: a retrospective analysis of 118 subcondylar fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014; 72:370–375. PMID: 24075238.
12. Ellis E 3rd. Condylar process fractures of the mandible. Facial Plast Surg. 2000; 16:193–205. PMID: 11802368.
Article
13. Yang L, Patil PM. The retromandibular transparotid approach to mandibular subcondylar fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 41:494–499. PMID: 22169168.
Article
14. Ellis E 3rd, McFadden D, Simon P, Throckmorton G. Surgical complications with open treatment of mandibular condylar process fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000; 58:950–958. PMID: 10981974.
Article
15. Chossegros C, Cheynet F, Blanc JL, Bourezak Z. Short retromandibular approach of subcondylar fractures: clinical and radiologic long-term evaluation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996; 82:248–252. PMID: 8884820.
16. Bindra S, Choudhary K, Sharma P, Sheorain A, Sharma CB. Management of mandibular sub condylar and condylar fractures using retromandibular approach and assessment of associated surgical complications. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2010; 9:355–362. PMID: 22190824.
Article
17. Biglioli F, Colletti G. Mini-retromandibular approach to condylar fractures. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2008; 36:378–383. PMID: 18599302.
Article
18. Ellis E 3rd, Dean J. Rigid fixation of mandibular condyle fractures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1993; 76:6–15. PMID: 8351124.
Article
19. Devlin MF, Hislop WS, Carton AT. Open reduction and internal fixation of fractured mandibular condyles by a retromandibular approach: surgical morbidity and informed consent. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002; 40:23–25. PMID: 11883965.
20. Troulis MJ, Ramirez JL, Kaban LB. Endoscopic approach for mandibular orthognathic surgery. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2006; 14:45–50. PMID: 16466983.
Article
21. Kim BK, Kwon YD, Ohe JY, Choi YH, Choi BJ. Usefulness of the retromandibular transparotid approach for condylar neck and condylar base fractures. J Craniofac Surg. 2012; 23:712–715. PMID: 22565884.
Article
22. Shi D, Patil PM, Gupta R. Facial nerve injuries associated with the retromandibular transparotid approach for reduction and fixation of mandibular condyle fractures. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015; 43:402–407. PMID: 25600628.
Article
23. Son JH, Ha J, Cho YC, Sung IY. Are biodegradable plates applicable in endoscope-assisted open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular subcondyle fractures? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017; 75:1706–1715. PMID: 28453951.
Article
24. Widmark G, Bågenholm T, Kahnberg KE, Lindahl L. Open reduction of subcondylar fractures. A study of functional rehabilitation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996; 25:107–111. PMID: 8727580.
Full Text Links
  • JKAOMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr