J Korean Acad Prosthodont.  2018 Apr;56(2):95-104. 10.4047/jkap.2018.56.2.95.

Analysis of longevity and success rate of fixed, removable, and implant prostheses treated in Korea

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, NHIS Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
  • 2Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • 3Department of Prosthodontics, School of Medicine, Inha University, Incheon, Republic of Korea. onsdo@inha.ac.kr

Abstract

PURPOSE
The purpose of this study is to analyze the factors affecting the longevity of failed prosthesis and the success rate of the prosthesis based on the data evaluated with the newly developed Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (KAP) criteria.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Evaluation was performed in the restored prosthesis for patients who visited the prosthodontics department of the 13 dental university hospitals and general hospitals. The status of the prosthesis was classified into four categories: Good, Fair, Bad, Worst. The success was recorded if only the category was classified in "˜good'. The mean duration of failed prostheses and the success rate through Kaplan-Meier method were analyzed.
RESULTS
A total of 1,804 cases of prosthesis were evaluated: 810 cases of fixed dental prostheses (FDP), 519 cases of Removable Dental Prostheses (RDP), and 475 cases of implant prosthesis. The mean duration of failed FDP was 11.41 ± 0.30 years and the median was 10 years. The mean duration of failed RDP was 8.18 ± 0.29 years and the median was 7 years. The mean duration of failed implant prosthesis was 7.99 ± 0.30 years and the median was 7 years. The factors related to the failure were as follows: number of units, abutments, abutments treated with root canal, and plaque index in FDPs; treated and opposing dentition in RDPs; the number of implants, duration of use, and plaque index in implant prostheses.
CONCLUSION
The average duration of failed prosthesis was 11.41 years for FDPs, 8.18 years for RDPs, and 7.99 years for implant prosthesis, according to the evaluation with newly developed KAP criteria.

Keyword

Life expectancy; Kaplan Meier analysis; Follow-up studies; Prostheses and implants

MeSH Terms

Dental Prosthesis
Dental Pulp Cavity
Dentition
Follow-Up Studies
Hospitals, General
Hospitals, University
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Korea*
Life Expectancy
Longevity*
Methods
Prostheses and Implants*
Prosthodontics

Cited by  1 articles

The biofilm removal effect of MnO2-diatom microbubbler from the dental prosthetic surfaces: In vitro study
Eun-Hyuk Lee, Yongbeom Seo, Ho-Bum Kwon, Young-Jun Yim, Hyunjoon Kong, Myung-Joo Kim
J Korean Acad Prosthodont. 2020;58(1):14-22.    doi: 10.4047/jkap.2020.58.1.14.


Reference

1. Kwon BK, Ahn HJ, Kang JK, Kim JY, Choi JH. The jurisdictional precedent analysis of medical dispute in dental field. J Oral Med Pain. 2006; 31:283–296.
2. Korea Consumer Agency. Implant treatment is the most common dental disputes. 2013. September 2, 2017. Available from: http://www.kca.go.kr/brd/m_4/view.do?seq=408&multi_itm_seq=0.
3. Cha YR, Kwon JS, Choi JH, Kim JY. The analysis of the current status of medical accidents and disputes researched in the Korean web sites. J Oral Med Pain. 2006; 31:297–316.
4. Park SG, Shin HS, Kim SM. Dental accidents and malpractice disputes survey. J Korean Dent Assoc. 2015; 53:103–110.
5. Schwartz NL, Whitsett LD, Berry TG, Stewart JL. Unserviceable crowns and fixed partial dentures: Life-span and causes for loss of serviceability. J Am Dent Assoc. 1970; 81:1395–1401.
Article
6. Foster LV. Failed conventional bridge work from general dental practice: clinical aspects and treatment needs of 142 cases. Br Dent. 1990; 168:199.
Article
7. Valderhaug J. A 15-year clinical evaluation of fixed prosthodontics. Acta Odontol Scand. 1991; 49:35–40.
Article
8. Yang JH. Report on the longevity of prostheses. . Seoul, Korea: Korean Academy of Prosthodontics;2001.
9. Shin WJ, Jeon YS, Lee KW, Lee HY, Han DH. Longevity and failure analysis of fixed restorations serviced in Korea. J Korean Acad Prosthodont. 2005; 43:158–175.
10. Yun MJ, Jeon YC, Jeong CM. Evaluation of clinical status of fixed prosthesis. J Korean Acad Prosthodont. 2009; 47:99–107.
Article
11. Yoon JH, Park YB, Youn SH, Oh NS. Korea academy of prosthodontics criteria for longevity studies of dental prostheses. J Korean Acad Prosthodont. 2016; 54:341–353.
Article
12. Walton JN, Gardner FM, Agar JR. A survey of crown and fixed partial denture failures: Length of service and reasons for replacement. J Prosthet Dent. 1986; 56:416–421.
Article
13. Libby G, Arcuri MR, LaVelle WE, Hebl L. Longevity of fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1997; 78:127–131.
Article
14. Vermeulen AHBM, Keltjens HMAM, van’t Hof MA, Kayser AF. Ten-year evaluation of removable partial dentures: Survival rates based on retreatment, not wearing and replacement. J Prosthet Dent. 1996; 76:267–272.
Article
15. Sundh B, Odman P. A study of fixed prosthodontics performed at a university clinic 18 years after insertion. Int J Prosthodont. 1997; 10:513–519.
16. Lindquist E, Karlsson S. Success rate and failures for fixed partial dentures after 20 years of service: Part I. Int J Prosthodont. 1998; 11:133–138.
17. Holm C, Tidehag P, Tillberg A, Molin M. Longevity and quality of FPDs: a retrospective study of restorations 30, 20, and 10 years after insertion. Int J Prosthodont. 2003; 16:283–289.
18. Creugers NH, Käyser AF, van’t Hof MA. A meta-analysis of durability data on conventional fixed bridges. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1994; 22:448–452.
Article
19. Scurria MS, Bader JD, Shugars DA. Meta-analysis of fixed partial denture survival: prostheses and abutments. J Prosthet Dent. 1998; 79:459–464.
Article
20. Pjetursson BE, Sailer I, Makarov NA, Zwahlen M, Thoma DS. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part II: Multiple-unit FDPs. Dent Mater. 2015; 31:624–639.
Article
21. Pjetursson BE, Tan K, Lang NP, Brägger U, Egger M, Zwahlen M. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004; 15:625–642.
Article
22. Moldovan O, Rudolph H, Luthardt RG. Clinical performance of removable dental prostheses in the moderately reduced dentition: a systematic literature review. Clin Oral Investig. 2016; 20:1435–1447.
Article
23. Pjetursson BE, Thoma D, Jung R, Zwahlen M, Zembic A. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012; 23:Suppl 6. 22–38.
Article
24. Sax C, Hämmerle CH, Sailer I. 10-year clinical outcomes of fixed dental prostheses with zirconia frameworks. Int J Comput Dent. 2011; 14:183–202.
25. Schwartz NL, Whitsett LD, Berry TG, Stewart JL. Unserviceable crowns and fixed partial dentures: life-span and causes for loss of serviceability. J Am Dent Assoc. 1970; 81:1395–1401.
Article
26. Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 90:121–132.
Article
27. Schmitter M, Mussotter K, Rammelsberg P, Gabbert O, Ohlmann B. Clinical performance of long-span zirconia frameworks for fixed dental prostheses: 5-year results. J Oral Rehabil. 2012; 39:552–557.
Article
28. Sailer I, Fehér A, Filser F, Gauckler LJ, Lüthy H, Hämmerle CH. Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont. 2007; 20:383–388.
Full Text Links
  • JKAP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr