Kidney Res Clin Pract.  2018 Mar;37(1):69-76. 10.23876/j.krcp.2018.37.1.69.

Effects of education on low-phosphate diet and phosphate binder intake to control serum phosphate among maintenance hemodialysis patients: A randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Nephrology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea. jcj0425@empal.com
  • 2Department of Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
  • 3Korean Network of Organ Sharing, Seoul, Korea.
  • 4Department of Emergency Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
  • 5Department of Pharmacy, Ajou University Hospital, Suwon, Korea.
  • 6Department of Food Services and Clinical Nutrition, Ajou University Hospital, Suwon, Korea.
  • 7Department of Community Health Sciences, University of California, School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
For phosphate control, patient education is essential due to the limited clearance of phosphate by dialysis. However, well-designed randomized controlled trials about dietary and phosphate binder education have been scarce.
METHODS
We enrolled maintenance hemodialysis patients and randomized them into an education group (n = 48) or a control group (n = 22). We assessed the patients' drug compliance and their knowledge about the phosphate binder using a questionnaire.
RESULTS
The primary goal was to increase the number of patients who reached a calcium-phosphorus product of lower than 55. In the education group, 36 (75.0%) patients achieved the primary goal, as compared with 16 (72.7%) in the control group (P = 0.430). The education increased the proportion of patients who properly took the phosphate binder (22.9% vs. 3.5%, P = 0.087), but not to statistical significance. Education did not affect the amount of dietary phosphate intake per body weight (education vs. control: −1.18 ± 3.54 vs. −0.88 ± 2.04 mg/kg, P = 0.851). However, the dietary phosphate-to-protein ratio tended to be lower in the education group (−0.64 ± 2.04 vs. 0.65 ± 3.55, P = 0.193). The education on phosphate restriction affected neither the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment score (0.17 ± 4.58 vs. −0.86 ± 3.86, P = 0.363) nor the level of dietary protein intake (−0.03 ± 0.33 vs. −0.09 ± 0.18, P = 0.569).
CONCLUSION
Education did not affect the calcium-phosphate product. Education on the proper timing of phosphate binder intake and the dietary phosphate-to-protein ratio showed marginal efficacy.

Keyword

Compliance; Hemodialysis; Hyperphosphatemia; Phosphates

MeSH Terms

Body Weight
Compliance
Dialysis
Diet*
Dietary Proteins
Education*
Humans
Hyperphosphatemia
Patient Education as Topic
Phosphates
Renal Dialysis*
Dietary Proteins
Phosphates
Full Text Links
  • KRCP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr