Korean J Orthod.  2018 Mar;48(2):98-106. 10.4041/kjod.2018.48.2.98.

Adjunctive buccal and palatal corticotomy for adult maxillary expansion in an animal model

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Paediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. zamrir@um.edu.my
  • 2Department of Veterinary Clinical Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • 3Department of Diagnostic and Intergrated Dental Practice, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  • 4Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to explore the usefulness of adjunctive buccal and palatal corticotomy for adult maxillary expansion in an animal model using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
METHODS
Twelve adult sheep were randomly divided into two groups (each n = 6): a control group, where no treatment was administered, and a treatment group, where buccal and palatal corticotomy-assisted maxillary expansion was performed. CBCT scans were taken before (T1) and after (T2) treatment. Differences in all transverse dental and alveolar dimensions, alveolar width at crest level, hard palate level, horizontal bone loss, interdental cusp width and inter-root apex were assessed using Wilcoxon signed-rank and Mann-Whitney U-tests. Kruskal-Wallis tests and pairwise comparisons were used to detect the significance of differences among the inter-premolar and inter-molar widths.
RESULTS
CBCT data revealed significant changes in all transverse dental and alveolar dimensions. The mean interpremolar alveolar width showed an increase of 2.29 to 3.62 mm at the hard palate level, 3.89 to 4.38 mm at the alveolar crest level, and 9.17 to 10.42 mm at the buccal cusp level. Dental changes in the vertical dimension were not significant.
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings based on an adult animal model suggest that adjunctive buccal and palatal corticotomy can allow for both skeletal and dental expansion, with the amount of dental expansion exceeding that of skeletal expansion at alveolar crest and hard palate levels by two and three folds, respectively. Therefore, this treatment modality is potential to enhance the outcomes of maxillary expansion in adults.

Keyword

Buccal corticotomy; Palatal corticotomy; Maxillary expansion; Cone-beam computed tomography; Sheep model

MeSH Terms

Adult*
Animals*
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Humans
Models, Animal*
Palatal Expansion Technique*
Palate, Hard
Sheep
Vertical Dimension

Figure

  • Figure 1 Hyrax appliance for rapid maxillary expansion (RME) in a sheep model and placement of corticotomy incisions. A, RME appliance with a Super-Screw® (Great Lakes Orthodontics, Tonawanda, NY, USA) positioned parallel to the midpalatal suture. B, Buccal view showing the corticotomy incision from the mesial aspect of the first premolar to the distal aspect of the third premolar. C, Occlusal view showing the palatal aspect of the corticotomy incision.

  • Figure 2 Linear skeletal and dental measurements on cone-beam computed tomography images for evaluation of the effects of buccal and palatal corticotomy-assisted rapid maxillary expansion in sheep. A, Alveolar width at the crest level (Cr-Cr level) and hard palate level (HP level) and marginal alveolar bone loss (Cu-Cr). B, Tooth displacement at the cusp level (Cu-Cu), central pulp level (Pu-Pu), and root apex level (R-R), and vertical tooth displacement (Cu-NS).

  • Figure 3 Superimposition of images acquired before (green) and after (red) buccal and palatal corticotomy-assisted rapid maxillary expansion in sheep using Mimics Software (Materialise NV, Leuven, Belgium). The red part revealed the significant changes after treatment from left side view (A); from occlusal view (B); and from right side view (C); and the mean transverse skeletal (hard palate [HP] and alveolar crest levels) and dental changes (cusp level) in the premolar region (D).


Cited by  2 articles

Corticotomy for orthodontic tooth movement
Won Lee
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;44(6):251-258.    doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2018.44.6.251.

Alveolar restoration following rapid maxillary expansion with and without corticotomy: A microcomputed tomography study in sheep
My Huy Thuc Le, Abu Kasim Noor Hayaty, Zuraiza Mohamad Zaini, Sulaiman Md Dom, Norliza Ibrahim, Zamri Bin Radzi
Korean J Orthod. 2019;49(4):235-245.    doi: 10.4041/kjod.2019.49.4.235.


Reference

1. Northway W. Palatal expansion in adults: the surgical approach. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 140:463. 465. 467 passim.
Article
2. Handelman C. Palatal expansion in adults: the nonsurgical approach. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 140:462. 464. 466 passim.
Article
3. McNamara JA Jr, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Herberger TA. Rapid maxillary expansion followed by fixed appliances: a long-term evaluation of changes in arch dimensions. Angle Orthod. 2003; 73:344–353.
4. Gurel HG, Memili B, Erkan M, Sukurica Y. Long-term effects of rapid maxillary expansion followed by fixed appliances. Angle Orthod. 2010; 80:5–9.
Article
5. Lagravere MO, Major PW, Flores-Mir C. Long-term skeletal changes with rapid maxillary expansion: a systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2005; 75:1046–1052.
6. Suri L, Taneja P. Surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion: a literature review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 133:290–302.
Article
7. Handelman CS, Wang L, BeGole EA, Haas AJ. Nonsurgical rapid maxillary expansion in adults: report on 47 cases using the Haas expander. Angle Orthod. 2000; 70:129–144.
8. Bishara SE, Staley RN. Maxillary expansion: clinical implications. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987; 91:3–14.
Article
9. Bassarelli T, Dalstra M, Melsen B. Changes in clinical crown height as a result of transverse expansion of the maxilla in adults. Eur J Orthod. 2005; 27:121–128.
Article
10. Angelieri F, Cevidanes LH, Franchi L, Gonçalves JR, Benavides E, McNamara JA Jr. Midpalatal suture maturation: classification method for individual assessment before rapid maxillary expansion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013; 144:759–769.
Article
11. Knaup B, Yildizhan F, Wehrbein H. Age-related changes in the midpalatal suture. A histomorphometric study. J Orofac Orthop. 2004; 65:467–474.
12. Korbmacher H, Schilling A, Püschel K, Amling M, Kahl-Nieke B. Age-dependent three-dimensional microcomputed tomography analysis of the human midpalatal suture. J Orofac Orthop. 2007; 68:364–376.
Article
13. Kole H. Surgical operations on the alveolar ridge to correct occlusal abnormalities. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1959; 12:515–529.
Article
14. Choo H, Heo HA, Yoon HJ, Chung KR, Kim SH. Treatment outcome analysis of speedy surgical orthodontics for adults with maxillary protrusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 140:e251–e262.
Article
15. Chung KR, Kim SH, Lee BS. Speedy surgical-orthodontic treatment with temporary anchorage devices as an alternative to orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 135:787–798.
Article
16. Chung KR, Mitsugi M, Lee BS, Kanno T, Lee W, Kim SH. Speedy surgical orthodontic treatment with skeletal anchorage in adults--sagittal correction and open bite correction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 67:2130–2148.
Article
17. Lines PA. Adult rapid maxillary expansion with corticotomy. Am J Orthod. 1975; 67:44–56.
Article
18. Echchadi ME, Benchikh B, Bellamine M, Kim SH. Corticotomy-assisted rapid maxillary expansion: A novel approach with a 3-year follow-up. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015; 148:138–153.
Article
19. Charan J, Kantharia ND. How to calculate sample size in animal studies? J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2013; 4:303–306.
Article
20. Wertz RA. Skeletal and dental changes accompanying rapid midpalatal suture opening. Am J Orthod. 1970; 58:41–66.
Article
21. Cao Y, Zhou Y, Song Y, Vanarsdall RL Jr. Cephalometric study of slow maxillary expansion in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 136:348–354.
Article
22. Lin L, Ahn HW, Kim SJ, Moon SC, Kim SH, Nelson G. Tooth-borne vs bone-borne rapid maxillary expanders in late adolescence. Angle Orthod. 2015; 85:253–262.
Article
23. Lagravère MO, Major PW, Flores-Mir C. Dental and skeletal changes following surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006; 35:481–487.
Article
24. O'Ryan F, Schendel S. Nasal anatomy and maxillary surgery. II. Unfavorable nasolabial esthetics following the Le Fort I osteotomy. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1989; 4:75–84.
25. Brunetto M, Andriani Jda S, Ribeiro GL, Locks A, Correa M, Correa LR. Three-dimensional assessment of buccal alveolar bone after rapid and slow maxillary expansion: a clinical trial study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013; 143:633–644.
Article
26. Rungcharassaeng K, Caruso JM, Kan JY, Kim J, Taylor G. Factors affecting buccal bone changes of maxillary posterior teeth after rapid maxillary expansion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007; 132:428.e1–428.e8.
Article
27. Gauthier C, Voyer R, Paquette M, Rompré P, Papadakis A. Periodontal effects of surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion evaluated clinically and with cone-beam computerized tomography: 6-month preliminary results. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 139:4 Suppl. S117–S128.
Article
28. Forst D, Nijjar S, Khaled Y, Lagravere M, Flores-Mir C. Radiographic assessment of external root resorption associated with jackscrew-based maxillary expansion therapies: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod. 2014; 36:576–585.
Article
29. Robiony M, Polini F, Costa F, Zerman N, Politi M. Ultrasonic bone cutting for surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion (SARME) under local anaesthesia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 36:267–269.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJOD
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr