J Educ Eval Health Prof.  2017;14:3. 10.3352/jeehp.2017.14.3.

Evaluation of team-based learning in a doctor of physical therapy curriculum in the United States

• Lein DH
• Lowman JD
• Eidson CA
• Yuen HK

• KMID: 2406666
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2017.14.3

Abstract

PURPOSE
The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate students' academic outcomes after implementation of the team-based learning (TBL) approach in patient/client management courses in an entry-level doctor of physical therapy (DPT) curriculum.
METHODS
The research design of this study involved comparing written and practical exam scores from DPT student cohorts taught with the traditional instructional methods (lecture-based) to those of students from subsequent cohorts taught using the TBL approach in two patient/client management courses: basic skills and cardiopulmonary. For this comparison, the exams used, the number of contact hours and labs, and the instructors who taught these courses remained the same during the transition between these two instructional methods (traditional vs. TBL). The average of all individual course exam scores was used for data analysis.
RESULTS
In both courses, there were no meaningful differences in the mean exam scores among students across years of cohorts receiving the same instructional method, which allowed clustering students from different years of cohorts in each course receiving the same instructional method into one group. For both courses, the mean exam score was significantly higher in the TBL group than in the traditional instruction group: basic skills course (P < 0.001) and cardiopulmonary course (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
Student cohorts taught using the TBL approach academically outperformed those who received the traditional instructional method in both entry-level DPT patient/client management courses.

Keyword

Health occupations; Physical therapists; Students; Education, Professional; Educational measurement

MeSH Terms

Cohort Studies
Curriculum*
Education, Professional
Educational Measurement
Health Occupations
Humans
Learning*
Methods
Physical Therapists
Research Design
Retrospective Studies
Statistics as Topic
United States*

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1. Mean of individual exam scores (with 95% confidential intervals) in two entry-level doctor of physical therapy patient/client management courses before and after implementation of TBL. TBL, team-based learning.

Reference

References

1. Michaelsen LK, Sweet M. Fundamental principles and practices of team-based learning. In : Michaelsen L, Parmelee D, McMahon K, Levine R, editors. Team-based learning for health professions education: a guide to using small groups for improving learning. Sterling (VA): Stylus Publishing;2008. p. 9–31.

2. Sevdalis N. Non-technical skills and the future of teamwork in healthcare settings [Internet]. London: The Health Foundation;2013. [cited 2017 Jan 11]. Available from: http://patientsafety.health.org.uk/sites/default/files/resources/non_technical_skills_and_the_future_of_teamwork_in_healthcare_settings.pdf.

3. Fatmi M, Hartling L, Hillier T, Campbell S, Oswald AE. The effec tiveness of team-based learning on learning outcomes in health professions education: BEME guide no. 30. Med Teach. 2013; 35:e1608–e1624. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.849802.

4. Huitt TW, Killins A, Brooks WS. Team-based learning in the gross anatomy laboratory improves academic performance and students’ attitudes toward teamwork. Anat Sci Educ. 2015; 8:95–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1460.

5. Livingston B, Lundy M, Harrington S. Physical therapy students’ perceptions of team-based learning in gross anatomy using the team-based learning student assessment instrument. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2014; 11:1. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2014.11.1.

6. Ghorbani N, Karbalay-Doust S, Noorafshan A. Is a team-based learning approach to anatomy teaching superior to didactic lecturing? Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2014; 14:e120–5. https://doi.org/10.12816/0003345.

7. Parmelee DX, Michaelsen LK. Twelve tips for doing effective team-based learning (TBL). Med Teach. 2010; 32:118–122. https://doi.org/10.3109/01421590903548562.

8. McRae ME, Chan A, Lee AJ, Hulett R, Coleman B. Team-based learning improves staff nurses’ knowledge of open- and closed-chest cardiac surgical resuscitation. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2017; 36:60–67.

9. McMullen I, Cartledge J, Levine R, Iversen A. Team-based learning for psychiatry residents: a mixed methods study. BMC Med Educ. 2013; 13:124. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-13-124.

10. Letassy NA, Fugate SE, Medina MS, Stroup JS, Britton ML. Using team-based learning in an endocrine module taught across two campuses. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008; 72:103.

11. Persky AM. The impact of team-based learning on a foundational pharmacokinetics course. Am J Pharm Educ. 2012; 76:31. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe76231.

12. Bleske BE, Remington TL, Wells TD, Klein KC, Guthrie SK, Tingen JM, Marshall VD, Dorsch MP. A randomized crossover comparison of team-based learning and lecture format on learning outcomes. Am J Pharm Educ. 2016; 80:120.

13. Koles PG, Stolfi A, Borges NJ, Nelson S, Parmelee DX. The impact of team-based learning on medical students’ academic performance. Acad Med. 2010; 85:1739–1745. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181f52bed.

14. Hazel SJ, Heberle N, McEwen MM, Adams K. Team-based learning increases active engagement and enhances development of teamwork and communication skills in a first-year course for veterinary and animal science undergraduates. J Vet Med Educ. 2013; 40:333–341. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.0213-034R1.

15. Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel. Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: report of an expert panel. Washington (DC): Interprofessional Education Collaborative;2011.