J Educ Eval Health Prof.  2015;12:48. 10.3352/jeehp.2015.12.48.

Emergency medicine and internal medicine trainees' smartphone use in clinical settings in the United States

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine & George E. Whalen VA Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. sonja.raaum@hsc.utah.edu
  • 2Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
  • 3Department of Emergency Medicine, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia.
  • 4Department of Internal Medicine Administration, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Abstract

PURPOSE
Smartphone technology offers a multitude of applications (apps) that provide a wide range of functions for healthcare professionals. Medical trainees are early adopters of this technology, but how they use smartphones in clinical care remains unclear. Our objective was to further characterize smartphone use by medical trainees at two United States academic institutions, as well as their prior training in the clinical use of smartphones.
METHODS
In 2014, we surveyed 347 internal medicine and emergency medicine resident physicians at the University of Utah and Brigham and Women's Hospital about their smartphone use and prior training experiences. Scores (0%-100%) were calculated to assess the frequency of their use of general features (email, text) and patient-specific apps, and the results were compared according to resident level and program using the Mann-Whitney U-test.
RESULTS
A total of 184 residents responded (response rate, 53.0%). The average score for using general features, 14.4/20 (72.2%) was significantly higher than the average score for using patient-specific features and apps, 14.1/44 (33.0%, P<0.001). The average scores for the use of general features, were significantly higher for year 3-4 residents, 15.0/20 (75.1%) than year 1-2 residents, 14.1/20 (70.5%, P=0.035), and for internal medicine residents, 14.9/20 (74.6%) in comparison to emergency medicine residents, 12.9/20 (64.3%, P=0.001). The average score reflecting the use of patient-specific apps was significantly higher for year 3-4 residents, 16.1/44 (36.5%) than for year 1-2 residents, 13.7/44 (31.1%; P=0.044). Only 21.7% of respondents had received prior training in clinical smartphone use.
CONCLUSION
Residents used smartphones for general features more frequently than for patient-specific features, but patient-specific use increased with training. Few residents have received prior training in the clinical use of smartphones.

Keyword

Cell phones; Emergency medicine; Internal medicine; Physicians; United States

MeSH Terms

Smartphone
Surveys and Questionnaires
Delivery of Health Care
Emergencies*
Emergency Medicine*
Internal Medicine*
United States*
Utah

Reference

1. Garritty C, El Emam K. Who’s using PDAs?: estimates of PDA use by health care providers: a systematic review of surveys. J Med Internet Res. 2006; 8:e7. http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8.2.e7.
Article
2. Lindquist AM, Johansson PE, Petersson GI, Saveman BI, Nilsson GC. The use of the Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) among personnel and students in health care: a review. J Med Internet Res. 2008; 10:e31. http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1038.
Article
3. Franko OI, Tirrell TF. Smartphone app use among medical providers in ACGME training programs. J Med Syst. 2012; 36:3135–3139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10916-011-9798-7.
Article
4. Payne KB, Wharrad H, Watts K. Smartphone and medical related App use among medical students and junior doctors in the United Kingdom (UK): a regional survey. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012; 12:121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-121.
Article
5. Kamerow D. Regulating medical apps: which ones and how much? BMJ. 2013; 347:f6009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f6009.
Article
6. Bastawrous A, Armstrong MJ. Mobile health use in low- and high-income countries: an overview of the peer-reviewed literature. J R Soc Med. 2013; 106:130–142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0141076812472620.
Article
7. United States Food and Drug Administration. Mobile medical applications: guidance for industry and Food and Drug Administration staff [Internet]. Silver Springs (MD): Food and Drug Administration;2013. [cited 2015 Jul 20]. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/UCM263366.pdf.
8. Boruff JT, Storie D. Mobile devices in medicine: a survey of how medical students, residents, and faculty use smartphones and other mobile devices to find information. J Med Libr Assoc. 2014; 102:22–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.102.1.006.
Article
9. Wu R, Rossos P, Quan S, Reeves S, Lo V, Wong B, Cheung M, Morra D. An evaluation of the use of smartphones to communicate between clinicians: a mixed-methods study. J Med Internet Res. 2011; 13:e59. http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1655.
Article
10. O’Reilly MK, Nason GJ, Liddy S, Fitzgerald CW, Kelly ME, Shields C. DOCSS: doctors on-call smartphone study. Ir J Med Sci. 2014; 183:573–577. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11845-013-1053-4.
Article
11. Katz-Sidlow RJ, Ludwig A, Miller S, Sidlow R. Smartphone use during inpatient attending rounds: prevalence, patterns and potential for distraction. J Hosp Med. 2012; 7:595–599. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jhm.1950.
Article
12. O’Connor P, Byrne D, Butt M, Offiah G, Lydon S, Mc Inerney K, Stewart B, Kerin MJ. Interns and their smartphones: use for clinical practice. Postgrad Med J. 2014; 90:75–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2013-131930.
Article
13. Association of American Medical Colleges. 2014 Physician specialty data book. Washington (DC): Association of American Medical Colleges;2014.
14. Weiss AJ, Wier LM, Stocks C, Blandchard J. Overview of emergency department visits in the United States, 2011: statistical brief #174. In: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) statistical briefs [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (US);2014. [cited 2015 Sep 1]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK235856/.
15. Chisholm CD, Collison EK, Nelson DR, Cordell WH. Emergency department workplace interruptions: are emergency physicians “interrupt-driven” and “multitasking”? Acad Emerg Med. 2000; 7:1239–1243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb00469.x.
Article
16. Gabow PA, Karkhanis A, Knight A, Dixon P, Eisert S, Albert RK. Observations of residents’ work activities for 24 consecutive hours: implications for workflow redesign. Acad Med. 2006; 81:766–775. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200608000-00016.
Article
17. Tran K, Morra D, Lo V, Quan SD, Abrams H, Wu RC. Medical students and personal smartphones in the clinical environment: the impact on confidentiality of personal health information and professionalism. J Med Internet Res. 2014; 16:e132. http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3138.
Article
18. Bierbrier R, Lo V, Wu RC. Evaluation of the accuracy of smartphone medical calculation apps. J Med Internet Res. 2014; 16:e32. http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3062.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JEEHP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr