J Educ Eval Health Prof.  2015;12:8. 10.3352/jeehp.2015.12.8.

How to encourage intrinsic motivation in the clinical teaching environment?: a systematic review from the self-determination theory

• Orsini C
• Evans P
• Jerez O

• KMID: 2402015
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2015.12.8

Abstract

PURPOSE
Internalization of students' motivation towards an intrinsic form is associated with increased interest, commitment, learning, and satisfaction with education. Self-Determination theory postulates that intrinsic motivation and autonomous forms of self-regulation are the desired type of motivation; as they have been associated with deep learning, better performance and well-being. It claims three basic psychological needs have to be satisfied in order to achieve intrinsic motivation. These are the needs for autonomy, competence and relatedness. This study aims to provide a review on how these basic psychological needs are encouraged in undergraduate students so they can be transferred to the clinical teaching environment.
METHODS
Electronic searches were performed across four databases (Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, and ERIC), relevant journals, and retrieved bibliography of selected articles. In total, searches produced 4,869 references, from which 16 studies met the inclusion criteria.
RESULTS
Main themes were coded in three categories: The support of autonomy, competence and relatedness. The research-based evidence appears to be of reasonable quality, and indicates that teachers should work to satisfy students' basic psychological needs to foster internalization of self-regulation. Our findings suggest that teachers should interact with students in a more 'human centred' teaching style, as these actions predict motivational internalization. Several themes emerged from different contexts and further investigation should expand them.
CONCLUSION
This review identified actions that clinical teachers could implement in their daily work to support students' self-determination. Autonomy supportive teaching in health professions educations would benefit students and may actually result in more effective health care delivery.

Keyword

Achievement; Learning; Motivation; Personal autonomy; Personal satisfaction

MeSH Terms

Delivery of Health Care
Education
Health Occupations
Humans
Learning
Mental Competency
Motivation*
Personal Autonomy
Personal Satisfaction
Self-Control

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1. Summary of literature search and review process.

Reference

1. Bengtsson M, Ohlsson B. The nursing and medical students motivation to attain knowledge. Nurse Educ Today. 2010; 30:150–156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2009.07.005.

2. Kusurkar R, Croiset G, Ten Cate T. Twelve tips to stimulate intrinsic motivation in students through autonomy-supportive classroom teaching derived from self-determination theory. Med Teach. 2011; 33:978–982. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.599896.

3. Davies B, Leung A, Dunne S. So how do you see our teaching? Some observations received from past and present students at the Maurice Wohl Dental Centre. Eur J Dent Educ. 2012; 16:138–143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0579.2012.00733.x.

4. Jahangiri L, McAndrew M, Muzaffar A, Mucciolo TW. Characteristics of effective clinical teachers identified by dental students: a qualitative study. Eur J Dent Educ. 2013; 17:10–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eje.12012.

5. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000; 55:68–78.

6. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2000; 25:54–67.

7. Vansteenkiste M, Lens W, Deci EL. Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory: another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educ Psychol. 2006; 41:19–31.

8. Niemiec CP, Ryan RM. Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory Res Educ. 2009; 7:133–144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104318.

9. Ten Cate TJ, Kusurkar RA, Williams GC. How self-determination theory can assist our understanding of the teaching and learning processes in medical education. AMEE guide No. 59. Med Teach. 2011; 33:961–973. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.595435.

10. Levesque C, Zuehlke AN, Stanek LR, Ryan RM. Autonomy and competence in German and American university students: a comparative study based on self-determination theory. J Educ Psychol. 2004; 96:68–84.

11. Williams GC, Saizow RB, Ryan RM. The importance of self-determination theory for medical education. Acad Med. 1999; 74:992–995.

12. Singh J. Critical appraisal skills programme. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2013; 4:76–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-500X.107697.

13. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Medicine. 2009; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100.

14. Benson TA, Cohen AL, Buskist W. Rapport: its relation to student attitudes and behaviors toward teachers and classes. Teach Psychol. 2005; 32:237–239.

15. Boggiano AK, Flink C, Shields A, Seelbach A, Barrett M. Use of techniques promoting students’ self-determination: effects on students’ analytic problem-solving skills. Motiv Emot. 1993; 17:319–336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00992323.

16. Sheldon KM, Bettencourt BA. Psychological need-satisfaction and subjective well-being within social groups. Br J Soc Psychol. 2002; 41:25–38.

17. Kaufman A, Dodge T. Student perceptions and motivation in the classroom: Exploring relatedness and value. Soc Psychol Educ An Int J. 2009; 12:101–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11218-008-9070-2.

18. Hodgins HS, Koestner R, Duncan N. On the compatibility of autonomy and relatedness. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 1996; 22:227–237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167296223001.

19. Brewer EW, Burgess DN. Professor’s role in motivating students to attend class. J Ind Teach Educ. 2005; 42:23–47.

20. Black AE, Deci EL. The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Sci Educ. 2000; 84:740–756. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84: 6<740::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-3.

21. Beachboard MR, Beachboard JC, Li W, Adkison SR. Cohorts and relatedness: Self-determination theory as an explanation of how learning communities affect educational outcomes. Res High Educ. 2011; 52:853–874. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11162-011-9221-8.

22. Ciani KD, Sheldon KM, Hilpert JC, Easter MA. Antecedents and trajectories of achievement goals: a self-determination theory perspective. Br J Educ Psychol. 2011; 81:223–243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000709910X517399.

23. Deci EL, Ryan RM. The “What” and “Why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inq. 2000; 11:227–268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.