J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg.  2017 Dec;19(4):291-300. 10.7461/jcen.2017.19.4.291.

Usefulness of Plaque Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Identifying High-Risk Carotid Plaques Irrespective of the Degree of Stenosis

Affiliations
  • 1Institute of Wonkwang Medical Science, Department of Neurosurgery, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, Iksan, Korea. kangsd@wku.ac.kr

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
Measurement of the degree of stenosis is not enough to decide on the treatment strategy for patients with carotid stenosis. Plaque morphology examination is needed for such a decision-making. Thus, we evaluated the usefulness of plaque magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to decide on the modality of treatment for patients with carotid atherosclerotic plaques.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Fifteen patients presenting with carotid stenosis between 2014 and 2016 were included. They underwent angiography for measurement of the degree of stenosis. Carotid plaques were visualized using MRI.
RESULTS
There were six (40%) stable and nine (60%) unstable plaques. Seven symptomatic patients (77.7%) had unstable lesions and two symptomatic patients (33.3%) had stable lesions (p = 0.096). There were six (40%) intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) cases. There were six symptomatic patients (100%) in the IPH group and three symptomatic patients (33.3%) in the non-IPH group (p = 0.013). The mean stenosis degree was 58.9% in the IPH group and 70.4% in the non-IPH group (p = 0.094). Symptoms occurred irrespective of the degree of the stenosis in the IPH groups. In the IPH group, the recurrent ischemic cerebrovascular event rate was 33.3%. Particularly, the recurrent ischemic cerebrovascular event rate was 66.7% in the IPH group with mild stenosis treated with medications.
CONCLUSION
IPH in plaque MRI is significantly associated with ischemic symptoms and has a high risk for subsequent ischemic cerebrovascular events irrespective of the degree of stenosis. Plaque MRI is a useful tool in predicting symptomatic risks for carotid stenosis irrespective of the degree of such stenosis.

Keyword

Atherosclerotic plaque; Magnetic resonance imaging; Hemorrhage; Carotid stenosis

MeSH Terms

Angiography
Carotid Stenosis
Constriction, Pathologic*
Hemorrhage
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging*
Plaque, Atherosclerotic

Figure

  • Fig. 1 (A) CT angiography shows mild stenosis of left ICA before cerebral infarction. (B) MRI showing multiple cerebral infarctions at the left cerebral hemisphere. (C) Left CCA angiogram shows no significant change of stenosis degree except small ulceration (black arrow) after recurrent cerebral infarction. CT = computed tomography; ICA = internal carotid artery; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; CCA = common carotid artery.

  • Fig. 2 Plaque MRIs show IPH. IPH (pink arrow) shows high-signal intensity on T1-weighted (A), TOF (B), SNAP (F), MPRAGE (G) images. On T2-weighted image (C), IPH (arrow) shows iso-signal intensity. On T1 enhanced image (D, E), focal disruption of fibrous cap (white arrow) is demonstrated. Focal disruption of fibrous cap in (E) is corresponding to plaque ulcer shown in DSA. MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; IPH = intraplaque hemorrhage; TOF = time-of-flight; SNAP = simultaneous non-contrast angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage; MPRAGE = magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo; DSA = digital subtraction angiography.

  • Fig. 3 MRI shows a new cerebral infarction at border zone of left hemisphere. MRI = magnetic resonance imaging.

  • Fig. 4 Operative findings. (A, B) Carotid plaque has IPH and ulcer as shown in the MRI. IPH = intraplaque hemorrhage; MRI = magnetic resonance image.

  • Fig. 5 Right CCA 3D angiogram shows mild stenosis of right ICA. CCA = common carotid artery; ICA = internal carotid artery.

  • Fig. 6 Plaque MRIs show IPH. IPH (pink arrow) shows high-signal intensity on T1-weighted (A), TOF (B), SNAP (E), MPRAGE (F) images. On T2-weighted image (C), IPH shows high-signal intensity (white arrow). On T1 enhanced images (D), fibrous cap is intact (yellow arrowhead). MRI = magnetic resonance image; IPH = intraplaque hemorrhage; TOF = time-of-flight; SNAP = simultaneous non-contrast angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage; MPRAGE = magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo.

  • Fig. 7 Right CCA 3D angiogram showing severe focal stenosis of the right proximal cervical ICA. CCA = common carotid artery; ICA = internal carotid artery.

  • Fig. 8 Right CCA angiogram shows dilatation of ICA after CAS. CCA = common carotid artery; ICA = internal carotid artery; CAS = carotid angioplasty and stenting.


Reference

1. Altaf N, Daniels L, Morgan PS, Auer D, MacSweeney ST, Moody AR, et al. Detection of intraplaque hemorrhage by magnetic resonance imaging in symptomatic patients with mild to moderate carotid stenosis predicts recurrent neurological events. J Vasc Surg. 2008; 2. 47(2):337–342. PMID: 18164171.
Article
2. Ambrose JA, Tannenbaum MA, Alexopoulos D, Hjemdahl-Monsen CE, Leavy J, Weiss M, et al. Angiographic progression of coronary artery disease and the development of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988; 7. 12(1):56–62. PMID: 3379219.
Article
3. Bassiouny HS, Sakaguchi Y, Mikucki SA, McKinsey JF, Piano G, Gewertz BL, et al. Juxtalumenal location of plaque necrosis and neoformation in symptomatic carotid stenosis. J Vasc Surg. 1997; 10. 26(4):585–594. PMID: 9357458.
Article
4. Cai JM, Hatsukami TS, Ferguson MS, Small R, Polissar NL, Yuan C. Classification of human carotid atherosclerotic lesions with in vivo multicontrast magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2002; 9. 106(11):1368–1373. PMID: 12221054.
Article
5. Carr S, Farb A, Pearce WH, Virmani R, Yao JS. Atherosclerotic plaque rupture in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. J Vasc Surg. 1996; 5. 23(5):755–765. discussion 765-6. PMID: 8667496.
Article
6. Chu B, Kampschulte A, Ferguson MS, Kerwin WS, Yarnykh VL, O'Brien KD, et al. Hemorrhage in the atherosclerotic carotid plaque: a high-resolution MRI study. Stroke. 2004; 5. 35(5):1079–1084. PMID: 15060318.
Article
7. Esposito-Bauer L, Saam T, Ghodrati I, Pelisek J, Heider P, Bauer M, et al. MRI plaque imaging detects carotid plaques with a high risk for future cerebrovascular events in asymptomatic patients. PLoS One. 2013; 7. 8(7):e67927. PMID: 23894291.
Article
8. Falk E. Why do plaques rupture? Circulation. 1992; 12. 86(6 Suppl):III30–III42. PMID: 1424049.
9. Golledge J, Greenhalgh RM, Davies AH. The symptomatic carotid plaque. Stroke. 2000; 3. 31(3):774–781. PMID: 10700518.
Article
10. Lusby RJ, Ferrell LD, Ehrenfeld W, Stoney R, Wylie EJ. Carotid plaque hemorrhage: its role in production of cerebral ischemia. Arch Surg. 1982; 11. 117(11):1479–1488. PMID: 6182861.
11. Maynor CH, Charles HC, Herfkens RJ, Suddarth SA, Johnson GA. Chemical shift imaging of atherosclerosis at 7.0 Tesla. Invest Radiol. 1989; 1. 24(1):52–60. PMID: 2917823.
Article
12. Mofidi R, Crotty TB, McCarthy P, Sheehan SJ, Mehigan D, Keaveny TV. Association between plaque instability, angiogenesis and symptomatic carotid occlusive disease. Br J Surg. 2001; 7. 88(7):945–950. PMID: 11442525.
Article
13. Robless P, Baxter A, Byrd S, Emson M, Halliday A. Prevalence of asymptomatic CT infarcts in the ongoing Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial (ACST). Int Angiol. 1998; 9. 17(3):194–200. PMID: 9821034.
14. Rothwell PM, Eliasziw M, Gutnikov SA, Fox AJ, Taylor DW, Mayberg MR, et al. Analysis of pooled data from the randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Lancet. 2003; 1. 361(9352):107–116. PMID: 12531577.
Article
15. Takaya N, Yuan C, Chu B, Saam T, Underhill H, Cai J, et al. Association between carotid plaque characteristics and subsequent ischemic cerebrovascular events: a prospective assessment with MRI--initial results. Stroke. 2006; 3. 37(3):818–823. PMID: 16469957.
Article
16. Toussaint JF, LaMuraglia GM, Southern JF, Fuster V, Kantor HL. Magnetic resonance images lipid, fibrous, calcified, hemorrhagic, and thrombotic components of human atherosclerosis in vivo. Circulation. 1996; 9. 94(5):932–938. PMID: 8790028.
Article
17. Toussaint JF, Southern JF, Fuster V, Kantor HL. T2-weighted contrast for NMR characterization of human atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1995; 10. 15(10):1533–1542. PMID: 7583524.
18. Virmani R, Kolodgie FD, Burke AP, Finn AV, Gold HK, Tulenko TN, et al. Atherosclerotic plaque progression and vulnerability to rupture: angiogenesis as a source of intraplaque hemorrhage. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005; 10. 25(10):2054–2061. PMID: 16037567.
19. Walker MD, Marler JR, Goldstein M, Grady PA, Toole JF, Baker WH, et al. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA. 1995; 5. 273(18):1421–1428. PMID: 7723155.
Article
20. Yuan C, Hatsukami TS, Beach KW, Hayes CE, Nelson JA, Ferguson MS, et al. In vivo MR evaluation of atherosclerosis in human carotid artery with use of phased-array coils. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1996; Jan-Feb. 7(1):46–48.
Article
21. Yuan C, Mitsumori LM, Ferguson MS, Polissar NL, Echelard D, Ortiz G, et al. In vivo accuracy of multispectral magnetic resonance imaging for identifying lipid-rich necrotic cores and intraplaque hemorrhage in advanced human carotid plaques. Circulation. 2001; 10. 104(17):2051–2056. PMID: 11673345.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JCEN
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr