Health Policy Manag.  2017 Sep;27(3):247-255. 10.4332/KJHPA.2017.27.3.247.

Impact of the Outpatient Prescription Incentive Program on Reduction of Pharmaceutical Costs of Clinics in South Korea

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Health Policy and Management, Yonsei University Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul, Korea.
  • 2Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, Wonju, Korea.
  • 3Research and Analysis Team, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea.
  • 4Institute of Health Services Research, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. ecpark@yuhs.ac
  • 5Department of Biostatistics, Yonsei University Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul, Korea.
  • 6National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea.
  • 7Department of Preventive Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
South Korea has experienced problems with excessive pharmaceutical expenditures. In 2010, the South Korean government introduced an outpatient prescription incentive program to effectively manage pharmaceutical expenditures. Therefore, we examined the relationship between the outpatient prescription incentive program and pharmaceutical expenditures.
METHODS
We used data from the Korean National Health Insurance claims database, which included medical claims filed for 22,732 clinics from 2011-2014 to evaluate associated pharmaceutical expenditures. We performed multiple regression analysis and Poisson regression analysis using generalized estimating equation models to examine the associations between outpatient prescription incentives and the outcome variables.
RESULTS
The data used in this study consisted of 123,392 cases from 22,372 clinics (average 5.4 periods follow-up). Clinics that had received outpatient prescription incentives in the last period had better cost saving and Outpatient Prescribing Costliness Index (OPCI) (received: proportion of cost saving, β=6.8179; p-value <0.0001; OPCI, β=−0.0227; p-value <0.0001; reference=non-received). Moreover, these clinics had higher risk in the provision of outpatient prescription incentive (relative risk, 2.772; 95% confidence interval, 2.720 to 2.824). The associations were higher in clinics that had separate prescribing and dispensing programs, or had professional staff.
CONCLUSION
The introduction of an outpatient prescription incentive program for clinics effectively managed problems with rapid increases of pharmaceutical expenditures in South Korea. However, the pharmaceutical expenditures still increased in spite of the positive impact of the outpatient prescription incentive program. Therefore, healthcare professionals and health policy makers should develop more effective alternatives (i.e., for clinics without separate prescribing and dispensing programs) based on our results.

Keyword

Pharmaceutical expenditures; Financial incentives; Health services research; Separation of prescribing and dispensing

MeSH Terms

Cost Savings
Delivery of Health Care
Health Expenditures
Health Policy
Health Services Research
Humans
Korea*
Motivation*
National Health Programs
Outpatients*
Prescriptions*
Full Text Links
  • HPM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr