Osong Public Health Res Perspect.  2017 Aug;8(4):247-254. 10.24171/j.phrp.2017.8.4.03.

Analyzing the Historical Development and Transition of the Korean Health Care System

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Health Policy and Management, Jeju National University, School of Medicine, Jeju, Korea.
  • 2Department of Preventive Medicine and Research Institute for Medical Sciences, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea. woung@cnu.ac.kr
  • 3National Health Insurance Service/Health Insurance Policy Research Institute, Wonju, Korea.
  • 4Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract


OBJECTIVES
Many economically advanced countries have attempted to minimize public expenditures and pursue privatization based on the principles of neo-liberalism. However, Korea has moved contrary to this global trend. This study examines why and how the Korean health care system was formed, developed, and transformed into an integrated, single-insurer, National Health Insurance (NHI) system.
METHODS
We describe the transition in the Korean health care system using an analytical framework that incorporates such critical variables as government economic development strategies and the relationships among social forces, state autonomy, and state power. This study focuses on how the relationships among social forces can change as a nation's economic development or governing strategy changes in response to changes in international circumstances such as globalization.
RESULTS
The corporatist Social Health Insurance (SHI) system (multiple insurers) introduced in 1977 was transformed into the single-insurer NHI in July 2000. These changes were influenced externally by globalization and internally by political democratization, keeping Korea's private-dominant health care provision system unchanged over several decades.
CONCLUSION
Major changes such as integration reform occurred, when high levels of state autonomy were ensured. The state's power (its policy capability), based on health care infrastructures, acts to limit the direction of any change in the health care system because it is very difficult to build the infrastructure for a health care system in a short timeframe.

Keyword

healthcare reform; national health programs; Korea; insurance; health

MeSH Terms

Delivery of Health Care*
Economic Development
Health Care Reform
Health Expenditures
Insurance
Insurance, Health
Internationality
Korea
National Health Programs
Privatization
Full Text Links
  • OPHRP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2022 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr