J Pathol Transl Med.  2017 Jul;51(4):365-373. 10.4132/jptm.2017.05.04.

Yes-Associated Protein Expression Is Correlated to the Differentiation of Prostate Adenocarcinoma

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Pathology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, Korea. cchoi@chonnam.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Urology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Yes-associated protein (YAP) in the Hippo signaling pathway is a growth control pathway that regulates cell proliferation and stem cell functions. Abnormal regulation of YAP was reported in human cancers including liver, lung, breast, skin, colon, and ovarian cancer. However, the function of YAP is not known in prostate adenocarcinoma. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of YAP in tumorigenesis, differentiation, and prognosis of prostate adenocarcinoma.
METHODS
The nuclear and cytoplasmic expression of YAP was examined in 188 cases of prostate adenocarcinoma using immunohistochemistry. YAP expression levels were evaluated in the nucleus and cytoplasm of the prostate adenocarcinoma and the adjacent normal prostate tissue. The presence of immunopositive tumor cells was evaluated and interpreted in comparison with the patients' clinicopathologic data.
RESULTS
YAP expression levels were not significantly different between normal epithelial cells and prostate adenocarcinoma. However, YAP expression level was significantly higher in carcinomas with a high Gleason grades (8-10) than in carcinomas with a low Gleason grades (6-7) (p < .01). There was no statistical correlation between YAP expression and stage, age, prostate-specific antigen level, and tumor volume. Biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival was significantly lower in patients with high YAP expressing cancers (p = .02). However high YAP expression was not an independent prognostic factor for BCR in the Cox proportional hazards model.
CONCLUSIONS
The results suggested that YAP is not associated with prostate adenocarcinoma development, but it may be associated with the differentiation of the adenocarcinoma. YAP was not associated with BCR.

Keyword

Yes-associated protein (YAP); Prostate adenocarcinoma; Immunohistochemistry; Gleason score

MeSH Terms

Adenocarcinoma*
Breast
Carcinogenesis
Cell Proliferation
Colon
Cytoplasm
Epithelial Cells
Humans
Immunohistochemistry
Liver
Lung
Ovarian Neoplasms
Prognosis
Proportional Hazards Models
Prostate*
Prostate-Specific Antigen
Recurrence
Skin
Stem Cells
Tumor Burden
Prostate-Specific Antigen

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Scoring according to the expression of Yes-associated protein (YAP) in prostate adenocarcinoma. (A) In prostate adenocarcinoma, both nuclei and cytoplasm are strongly positive for YAP, scored as high. (B) Negative expression is noted for YAP in prostate adenocarcinoma cells, which is scored as negative. (C) Nuclear expression in prostate adenocarcinoma cells, the nuclear stain over one tenth is scored as high. (D) YAP expression in normal prostate glands. Basal cells are strongly positive which were used as a positive control. Luminal cells did not show YAP expression. Stromal cells reveal mild expression of YAP.

  • Fig. 2. Expression of Yes-associated protein (YAP) in prostate adenocarcinoma and normal prostate glands. (A–D) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)–stained section of benign glands and immunohistochemical stain of YAP in normal prostate glands. Luminal cells of normal prostate gland show no expression to mild expression of YAP in the cytoplasm. All of the basal cells and stroma show positive YAP. H&E-stained section of well-to-moderately differentiated prostate adenocarcinoma (Gleason score, 4 + 3= 7). There are poorly formed glands and a few well-formed glands. (F) Expression of YAP in well-to-moderately differentiated prostate adenocarcinoma (Gleason score, 4+3=7). Tumor cells show either no or mild expression in the cytoplasm. (G) H&E-stained section of poorly differentiated prostate adenocarcinoma (Gleason score, 5+5=10). (H) Tumor cells display strong positivity in both nuclei and cytoplasm.

  • Fig. 3. Kaplan-Meier estimates of biochemical recurrence. Graph of the curve for progression-free survival in prostate adenocarcinoma patients, according to Yes-associated protein (YAP) expression (p=.02).


Reference

1. Diallo JS, Aldejmah A, Mouhim AF, et al. Co-assessment of cytoplasmic and nuclear androgen receptor location in prostate specimens: potential implications for prostate cancer development and prognosis. BJU Int. 2008; 101:1302–9.
Article
2. Joung JY, Lim J, Oh CM, et al. Current trends in the incidence and survival rate of urological cancers in Korea. Cancer Res Treat. 2016; Sep. 23. [Epub]. https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.139.
Article
3. Zhang L, Yang S, Chen X, et al. The hippo pathway effector YAP regulates motility, invasion, and castration-resistant growth of prostate cancer cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2015; 35:1350–62.
Article
4. Epstein JI, Allsbrook WC Jr, Amin MB, Egevad LL; ISUP Grading Committee. The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005; 29:1228–42.
Article
5. McMenamin ME, Soung P, Perera S, Kaplan I, Loda M, Sellers WR. Loss of PTEN expression in paraffin-embedded primary prostate cancer correlates with high Gleason score and advanced stage. Cancer Res. 1999; 59:4291–6.
6. Edgar BA. From cell structure to transcription: Hippo forges a new path. Cell. 2006; 124:267–73.
Article
7. Lai ZC, Wei X, Shimizu T, et al. Control of cell proliferation and apoptosis by mob as tumor suppressor, mats. Cell. 2005; 120:675–85.
Article
8. Gayyed MF, et al. Expression of Yes-associated protein in common solid tumors. Hum Pathol. 2008; 39:1582–9.
9. Wang Y, Dong Q, Zhang Q, Li Z, Wang E, Qiu X. Overexpression of yes-associated protein contributes to progression and poor prognosis of non-small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Sci. 2010; 101:1279–85.
Article
10. Cordenonsi M, Zanconato F, Azzolin L, et al. The Hippo transducer TAZ confers cancer stem cell-related traits on breast cancer cells. Cell. 2011; 147:759–72.
Article
11. DiAgostino S, Sorrentino G, Ingallina E, et al. YAP enhances the proproliferative transcriptional activity of mutant p53 proteins. EMBO Rep. 2016; 17:188–201.
12. Lee KW, Lee SS, Kim SB, et al. Significant association of oncogene YAP1 with poor prognosis and cetuximab resistance in colorectal cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2015; 21:357–64.
Article
13. Kim GJ, Kim H, Park YN. Increased expression of Yes-associated protein 1 in hepatocellular carcinoma with stemness and combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma. PLoS One. 2013; 8:e75449.
Article
14. Morvaridi S, Dhall D, Greene MI, Pandol SJ, Wang Q. Role of YAP and TAZ in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and in stellate cells associated with cancer and chronic pancreatitis. Sci Rep. 2015; 5:16759.
Article
15. Johnson R, Halder G. The two faces of Hippo: targeting the Hippo pathway for regenerative medicine and cancer treatment. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2014; 13:63–79.
Article
16. Grasso CS, Wu YM, Robinson DR, et al. The mutational landscape of lethal castration-resistant prostate cancer. Nature. 2012; 487:239–43.
Article
17. Hu X, Yu J, Chen J, Fu Q. Loss ofYAP protein in prostate cancer is associated with Gleason score increase. Tumori. 2015; 101:189–93.
18. Varambally S, Yu J, Laxman B, et al. Integrative genomic and proteomic analysis of prostate cancer reveals signatures of metastatic progression. Cancer Cell. 2005; 8:393–406.
Article
19. Chandran UR, Ma C, Dhir R, et al. Gene expression profiles of prostate cancer reveal involvement of multiple molecular pathways in the metastatic process. BMC Cancer. 2007; 7:64.
Article
20. Yu YP, Landsittel D, Jing L, et al. Gene expression alterations in prostate cancer predicting tumor aggression and preceding development of malignancy. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22:2790–9.
Article
21. Satake H, Tamura K, Furihata M, et al. The ubiquitin-like molecule interferon-stimulated gene 15 is overexpressed in human prostate cancer. Oncol Rep. 2010; 23:11–6.
Article
22. Planche A, Bacac M, Provero P, et al. Identification of prognostic molecularfeatures in the reactive stroma of human breast and prostate cancer. PLoS One. 2011; 6:e18640.
23. Arredouani MS, Lu B, Bhasin M, et al. Identification of the transcription factor single-minded homologue 2 as a potential biomarker and immunotherapy target in prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2009; 15:5794–802.
Article
24. Nanni S, Priolo C, Grasselli A, et al. Epithelial-restricted gene profile of primary cultures from human prostate tumors: a molecular approach to predict clinical behavior of prostate cancer. Mol Cancer Res. 2006; 4:79–92.
Article
25. Rosenbluh J, Nijhawan D, Cox AG, et al. beta-Catenin-driven cancers require a YAP1 transcriptional complex for survival and tumorigenesis. Cell. 2012; 151:1457–73.
26. Dong J, Feldmann G, Huang J, et al. Elucidation of a universal size-control mechanism in Drosophila and mammals. Cell. 2007; 130:1120–33.
27. Shen S, Guo X, Yan H, et al. AmiR-130a-YAP positive feedback loop promotes organ size and tumorigenesis. Cell Res. 2015; 25:997–1012.
28. Xiao W, Wang J, Ou C, et al. Mutual interaction between YAP and c-Myc is critical for carcinogenesis in liver cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013; 439:167–72.
Article
29. Zhang W, Nandakumar N, Shi Y, et al. Downstream of mutant KRAS, the transcription regulator YAP is essential for neoplastic progression to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Sci Signal. 2014; 7:ra42.
Article
30. Zanconato F, Cordenonsi M, Piccolo S. YAP/TAZ at the roots of cancer. Cancer Cell. 2016; 29:783–803.
Article
31. Guo Y, Pan Q, Zhang J, et al. Functional and clinical evidence that TAZ is a candidate oncogene in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Cell Biochem. 2015; 116:2465–75.
Article
32. Bartucci M, Dattilo R, Moriconi C, et al. TAZ is required for metastatic activity and chemoresistance of breast cancer stem cells. Oncogene. 2015; 34:681–90.
Article
33. Han KR, Seligson DB, Liu X, et al. Prostate stem cell antigen expression is associated with gleason score, seminal vesicle invasion and capsularinvasion in prostate cancer. J Urol. 2004; 171:1117–21.
34. Kim DH, Kim SH, Lee OJ, et al. Differential expression of Yes-associated protein and phosphorylated Yes-associated protein is correlated with expression of Ki-67 and phospho-ERK in colorectal adenocarcinoma. Histol Histopathol. 2013; 28:1483–90.
35. Hu X, Xin Y, Xiao Y, Zhao J. Overexpression of YAP1 is correlated with progression, metastasis and poor prognosis in patients with gastric carcinoma. Pathol Oncol Res. 2014; 20:805–11.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JPTM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr