Nutr Res Pract.  2009 Dec;3(4):300-306.

A study on the consumer's perception of front-of-pack nutrition labeling

• Kim WK
• Kim J

Abstract

The goal of this research is to investigate the present situation for front of pack labeling in Korea and the perception of consumers for the new system of labeling, front of pack labeling, based on the consumer survey. We investigated the number of processed foods with front of pack labeling in one retailer in Youngin-si. And we also surveyed 1,019 participants nationwide whose ages were from 20 to 49; the knowledge of nutrition labeling, the knowledge of 'front of pack labeling', and the opinion about the labeling system. The data were analyzed using SAS statistics program. The results were as follows: 13.4% of processed foods had front of pack labeling, and 16.8% of the consumers always checked the nutrition labeling, while 32.7% of the consumers seldom checked it. In addition, 44.3% of the consumers think that 'front of pack labeling' is necessary, and 58.3% of the consumers think it is important to show the percentage of daily value as a way of 'front of pack labeling'. However, 32% of the consumer think the possibility of 'front of pack labeling' is slim. Meanwhile, 58.3% of the consumers think that it is important to have the color difference according to contents. The number of favorite nutrients in the front of pack was four or five. It seems that the recognition of current nutrition labeling has the influence on the willingness of using the future 'front of pack labeling'. Along with our study, the policy for 'front of pack labeling' has to be updated and improved constantly since 'front of pack labeling' helps consumer understand nutrition facts.

Keyword

Nutrition labeling; front-of-pack (FOP) nutrition labeling; back-of pack; consumer perception; survey

MeSH Terms

Food Labeling
Korea
Phenothiazines
Phenothiazines

Reference

1. Chang NS. Guidance daily amounts for sugar and sodium in foods for children. KFDA Report. 2007. 10/01/2009. http://rnd.kfda.go.kr/index.jsp.

2. Chung JY, Kim MJ. Using and understanding of nutrition labels and related factors among female adults in the Seoul area. Korean Journal of Community Nutrition. 2007. 12:417–425.

3. Proposal for a regulation of the European parliament and of the council on the provision of food information to consumers. Commission of the European Communities. 2008. 10/01/2009. http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/labelingnutrition/foodlabeling/publications/proposal_regulation_ep_council.pdf.

4. CIAA labeling scheme. Confederation of the food and drink industries of the EU (Confédération des industries agro-alimentaires de l'UE). 2009. 10/01/2009. http://www.active-lifestyle.eu/asp/our_actions/l2.asp?doc_id=29.

5. Dotsch-Klerk M, Jensen L. The choice programme: a simple, front-of-pack stamp making healthy choices easy. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2008. 17:383–386.

6. Feunekes GI, Gortemaker IA, Willems AA, Lion R, van den Kommer M. Front-of-pack nutrition labeling: testing effectiveness of different nutrition labeling formats front-of-pack in four European countries. Appetite. 2008. 50:57–70.

7. Traffic light labeling. Food Standards Agency. 2009. 10/01/2009. http://www.eatwell.gov.uk/foodlabels/trafficlights/.

8. Kelly B, Hughes C, Chapman K, Louie J, Dixon H, King L. On behalf of a collaboration of public health and consumer research group. Front-of-pack : Traffic light labeling gets the green light. cancer council food labeling. 2008. 10/01/2009. http://www.cancercouncil.com.au/editorial.asp?pageid=2456.

9. Nutrition Labeling Standards. Korean Food and Drug Administration. 2008. 10/01/2009. http://www.kfda.go.kr/index.kfda?x=26&searchkey=title:contents &mid=69.

10. Lee KJ, Lee YH. Consumer's recognition and using state about food-nutrition labeling system among twenties. Journal East Asian Society Dietary Life. 2004. 14:54–63.

11. Lee KO, Kim YS. Consumer's practicality, acknowledgement, trust, satisfaction, necessity degrees about food nutrition labeling system. Journal Korean Living Science Association. 2007. 16:761–773.

12. Louie JCU, Flood V, Rangan A, Hector D, Gill T. A comparison of two nutrition signposting system for use in Australia. N S W Public Health Bull. 2008. 19:121–126.

13. Mhurchu CN, Gorton D. Nutrition labels claims in New Zealand and Australia: a review of use and understanding. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2007. 31:105–112.

14. The third Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES III). Ministry for Health, Welfare and Family affairs. 2006. 10/01/2009. http://www.mw.go.kr/front/jb/sjb030301vw.jsp?PAR_MENU_ID=03&MENU_ID=03030301&BOARD_ID=1003&BOARD_FLAG=03&CONT_SEQ=39301&page=1.

15. Food labeling survey. Netmums. 2007. 10/01/2009. http://www.netmums.com/food/The_Great_Netmums_Food_labeling_Survey.647/.

16. Park SS, Kim NY, Han MJ. Processed food preferences and food nutrition labeling perceptions of middle school students. Korean Journal of Food Cookery Science. 2008. 24:164–173.