J Periodontal Implant Sci.  2016 Feb;46(1):22-34. 10.5051/jpis.2016.46.1.22.

Root coverage using a coronally advanced flap with or without acellular dermal matrix: a meta-analysis

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Periodontology, The State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Basic Science of Stomatology (Hubei-MOST KLOS) & Key Laboratory for Oral Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education (KLOBME), School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China. caozhengguo@whu.edu.cn

Abstract

PURPOSE
Gingival recession is a major esthetic concern and may lead to root sensitivity during periodontal treatment. Coronally advanced flaps (CAFs) with and without acellular dermal matrix (ADM) are widely used in root coverage procedures. The aim of this study was to analyze the efficacy of CAF in combination with ADM in the treatment of gingival recession.
METHODS
PubMed, The Cochrane Library, and Embase were used to identify relevant articles. The articles were screened, data were extracted, and the quality of the studies was assessed by three reviewers with expertise in clinical practice, trials, statistics, and biomedical editing. The clinical endpoints of interest included changes in recession, probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), and keratinized tissue (KT).
RESULTS
Ten randomized controlled trials were identified, including six studies that compared CAFs with ADM and CAFs using connective tissue grafting (CTG) and four studies that compared CAFs with or without ADM. No statistically significant differences were found between the use of ADM and CTG, whereas statistically significant differences were found between groups in which ADM and CAF were combined and groups that underwent CAF alone with regard to recession coverage, CAL, and KT. The combination of CAF with an ADM allograft achieved more favorable recession coverage and recovery of CAL and KT than CAF alone.
CONCLUSIONS
The results from the ADM and CTG groups suggest that both procedures may be equally effective in clinical practice. Given the limitations of this study, further investigation is needed to clarify the effectiveness of ADM and CAF in clinical practice.

Keyword

Acellular Dermis; Gingival recession; Meta-analysis

MeSH Terms

Acellular Dermis*
Allografts
Connective Tissue
Gingival Recession
Transplants

Figure

  • Figure 1 Flowchart of the literature search.

  • Figure 2 Forest plots for (A) the reduction in recession, (B) the reduction in probing depth, (C) the gain in clinical attachment level, and (D) the gain in keratinized tissue. CAF, coronally advanced flap; ADM, acellular dermal matrix; CTG, connective tissue grafting.

  • Figure 3 Funnel plot for recession changes. CAF, coronally advanced flap; ADM, acellular dermal matrix; CTG, connective tissue grafting; SE, standard error; MD: mean difference.

  • Figure 4 Egger funnel plot for recession change.

  • Figure 5 Sensitivity analysis for (A) recession reduction comparing CAF with ADM and CAF with CTG, (B) recession reduction comparing CAF with ADM and CAF alone, and (C) KT gain comparing CAF with ADM and CAF with CTG. CAF, coronally advanced flap; ADM, acellular dermal matrix; CTG, connective tissue grafting; KT, keratinized tissue.


Reference

1. Tugnait A, Clerehugh V. Gingival recession-its significance and management. J Dent. 2001; 29:381–394.
Article
2. Oates TW, Robinson M, Gunsolley JC. Surgical therapies for the treatment of gingival recession. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol. 2003; 8:303–320.
Article
3. Roccuzzo M, Bunino M, Needleman I, Sanz M. Periodontal plastic surgery for treatment of localized gingival recessions: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2002; 29:Suppl 3. 178–194.
Article
4. Staffileno H. Management of gingival recession and root exposure problems associated with periodontal disease. Dent Clin North Am. 1964; 8:111–120.
5. Cohen DW, Ross SE. The double papillae repositioned flap in periodontal therapy. J Periodontol. 1968; 39:65–70.
Article
6. Pennel BM, Higgason JD, Towner JD, King KO, Fritz BD, Salder JF. Oblique Rotated Flap. J Periodontol. 1965; 36:305–309.
Article
7. Tarnow DP. Semilunar coronally repositioned flap. J Clin Periodontol. 1986; 13:182–185.
Article
8. Sullivan HC, Atkins JH. Free autogenous gingival grafts. I. Principles of successful grafting. Periodontics. 1968; 6:121–129.
9. Modica F, Del Pizzo M, Roccuzzo M, Romagnoli R. Coronally advanced flap for the treatment of buccal gingival recessions with and without enamel matrix derivative. A split-mouth study. J Periodontol. 2000; 71:1693–1698.
Article
10. Pini Prato G, Tinti C, Vincenzi G, Magnani C, Cortellini P, Clauser C. Guided tissue regeneration versus mucogingival surgery in the treatment of human buccal gingival recession. J Periodontol. 1992; 63:919–928.
Article
11. Wennström JL, Zucchelli G. Increased gingival dimensions. A significant factor for successful outcome of root coverage procedures? A 2-year prospective clinical study. J Clin Periodontol. 1996; 23:770–777.
Article
12. Harris RJ. Root coverage with a connective tissue with partial thickness double pedicle graft and an acellular dermal matrix graft: a clinical and histological evaluation of a case report. J Periodontol. 1998; 69:1305–1311.
Article
13. Chambrone L, Sukekava F, Araújo MG, Pustiglioni FE, Chambrone LA, Lima LA. Root-coverage procedures for the treatment of localized recession-type defects: a Cochrane systematic review. J Periodontol. 2010; 81:452–478.
Article
14. Ayub LG, Ramos UD, Reino DM, Grisi MF, Taba M Jr, Souza SL, et al. A Randomized comparative clinical study of two surgical procedures to improve root coverage with the acellular dermal matrix graft. J Clin Periodontol. 2012; 39:871–878.
Article
15. Higgins JP, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0. London: The Cochrane Collaboration;2011. Available from: www.cochrane-handbook.org.
16. Deeks JJ, Higgins JP, Altman DG. Chapter 9: Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In : Higgins JP, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0. London: The Cochrane Collaboration;2011. Available from: www.cochrane-handbook.org.
17. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002; 21:1539–1558.
Article
18. Aichelmann-Reidy ME, Yukna RA, Evans GH, Nasr HF, Mayer ET. Clinical evaluation of acellular allograft dermis for the treatment of human gingival recession. J Periodontol. 2001; 72:998–1005.
Article
19. Novaes AB Jr, Grisi DC, Molina GO, Souza SL, Taba M Jr, Grisi MF. Comparative 6-month clinical study of a subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix graft for the treatment of gingival recession. J Periodontol. 2001; 72:1477–1484.
Article
20. Paolantonio M, Dolci M, Esposito P, D’Archivio D, Lisanti L, Di Luccio A, et al. Subpedicle acellular dermal matrix graft and autogenous connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recessions: a comparative 1-year clinical study. J Periodontol. 2002; 73:1299–1307.
Article
21. Tal H, Moses O, Zohar R, Meir H, Nemcovsky C. Root coverage of advanced gingival recession: a comparative study between acellular dermal matrix allograft and subepithelial connective tissue grafts. J Periodontol. 2002; 73:1405–1411.
Article
22. Barros RR, Novaes AB Jr, Grisi MF, Souza SL, Taba MJ Jr, Palioto DB. A 6-month comparative clinical study of a conventional and a new surgical approach for root coverage with acellular dermal matrix. J Periodontol. 2004; 75:1350–1356.
Article
23. Woodyard JG, Greenwell H, Hill M, Drisko C, Iasella JM, Scheetz J. The clinical effect of acellular dermal matrix on gingival thickness and root coverage compared to coronally positioned flap alone. J Periodontol. 2004; 75:44–56.
Article
24. de Queiroz Côrtes A, Sallum AW, Casati MZ, Nociti FH Jr, Sallum EA. A two-year prospective study of coronally positioned flap with or without acellular dermal matrix graft. J Clin Periodontol. 2006; 33:683–689.
Article
25. Mahajan A, Dixit J, Verma UP. A patient-centered clinical evaluation of acellular dermal matrix graft in the treatment of gingival recession defects. J Periodontol. 2007; 78:2348–2355.
Article
26. Moslemi N, Mousavi Jazi M, Haghighati F, Morovati SP, Jamali R. Acellular dermal matrix allograft versus subepithelial connective tissue graft in treatment of gingival recessions: a 5-year randomized clinical study. J Clin Periodontol. 2011; 38:1122–1129.
Article
27. Ahmedbeyli C, Ipçi SD, Cakar G, Kuru BE, Yılmaz S. Clinical evaluation of coronally advanced flap with or without acellular dermal matrix graft on complete defect coverage for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions with thin tissue biotype. J Clin Periodontol. 2014; 41:303–310.
Article
28. Cairo F, Pagliaro U, Nieri M. Treatment of gingival recession with coronally advanced flap procedures: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2008; 35:Suppl. 136–162.
Article
29. Batista EL Jr, Batista FC, Novaes AB Jr. Management of soft tissue ridge deformities with acellular dermal matrix. Clinical approach and outcome after 6 months of treatment. J Periodontol. 2001; 72:265–273.
Article
30. Reagan BJ, Madden MR, Huo J, Mathwich M, Staiano-Coico L. Analysis of cellular and decellular allogeneic dermal grafts for the treatment of full-thickness wounds in a porcine model. J Trauma. 1997; 43:458–466.
Article
31. Alghamdi H, Babay N, Sukumaran A. Surgical management of gingival recession: A clinical update. Saudi Dent J. 2009; 21:83–94.
Article
32. Batista EL Jr, Batista FC, Novaes AB Jr. Management of soft tissue ridge deformities with acellular dermal matrix. Clinical approach and outcome after 6 months of treatment. J Periodontol. 2001; 72:265–273.
Article
33. Jayavel K, Swaminathan M, Kumar S. Ridge augmentation and root coverage using acellular dermal matrix: a case report. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2010; 7:88–91.
34. Gholami GA, Saberi A, Kadkhodazadeh M, Amid R, Karami D. Comparison of the clinical outcomes of connective tissue and acellular dermal matrix in combination with double papillary flap for root coverage: A 6-month trial. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2013; 10:506–513.
35. Pini Prato G, Rotundo R, Franceschi D, Cairo F, Cortellini P, Nieri M. Fourteen-year outcomes of coronally advanced flap for root coverage: follow-up from a randomized trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2011; 38:715–720.
Article
36. Joly JC, Carvalho AM, da Silva RC, Ciotti DL, Cury PR. Root coverage in isolated gingival recessions using autograft versus allograft: a pilot study. J Periodontol. 2007; 78:1017–1022.
Article
37. Henderson RD, Greenwell H, Drisko C, Regennitter FJ, Lamb JW, Mehlbauer MJ, et al. Predictable multiple site root coverage using an acellular dermal matrix allograft. J Periodontol. 2001; 72:571–582.
Article
38. Karring T, Lang NP, Löe H. The role of gingival connective tissue in determining epithelial differentiation. J Periodontal Res. 1975; 10:1–11.
Article
39. Zucchelli G, Amore C, Sforza NM, Montebugnoli L, De Sanctis M. Bilaminar techniques for the treatment of recession-type defects. A comparative clinical study. J Clin Periodontol. 2003; 30:862–870.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JPIS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr