J Korean Neurosurg Soc.  2017 Jul;60(4):385-390. 10.3340/jkns.2017.0101.007.

Surgical Informed Consent Process in Neurosurgery

• Park J
• Park H

• KMID: 2387875
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2017.0101.007

Abstract

The doctrine of informed consent, as opposed to medical paternalism, is intended to facilitate patient autonomy by allowing patient participation in the medical decision-making process. However, regrettably, the surgical informed consent (SIC) process is invariably underestimated and reduced to a documentary procedure to protect physicians from legal liability. Moreover, residents are rarely trained in the clinical and communicative skills required for the SIC process. Accordingly, to increase professional awareness of the SIC process, a brief history and introduction to the current elements of SIC, the obstacles to patient autonomy and SIC, benefits and drawbacks of SIC, planning of an optimal SIC process, and its application to cases of an unruptured intracranial aneurysm are all presented. Optimal informed consent process can provide patients with a good comprehension of their disease and treatment, augmented autonomy, a strong therapeutic alliance with their doctors, and psychological defenses for coping with stressful surgical circumstances.

Keyword

Informed consent; Intracranial aneurysm; Neurosurgery

MeSH Terms

Clinical Decision-Making
Comprehension
Humans
Informed Consent*
Intracranial Aneurysm
Liability, Legal
Neurosurgery*
Paternalism
Patient Participation

Reference

References

1. Ali V. Consent forms as part of the informed consent process: moving away from “medical Miranda”. Hastings Law J. 54:1575–1591. 2003.

2. Angelos P, DaRosa DA, Bentram D, Sherman H. Residents seeking informed consent: are they adequately knowledgeable? Curr Surg. 59:115–118. 2002.

3. Aremu SK, Alabi BS, Segun-Busari S. The role of informed consent in risks recall in otorhinolaryngology surgeries: verbal (nonintervention) vs written (intervention) summaries of risks. Am J Otolaryngol. 32:485–489. 2011.

4. Bean S, Magwood B, Abdoh AA, Chen J, Hochman J. Informed consent: exploring surgical residents’ beliefs, attitudes and practices. Healthc Q. 13:68–73. 2010.

5. Bernat JL, Peterson LM. Patient-centered informed consent in surgical practice. Arch Surg. 141:86–92. 2006.

6. Brenner LH, Brenner AT, Horowitz D. Beyond informed consent: educating the patient. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 467:348–351. 2009.

7. Chan Y, Irish JC, Wood SJ, Rotstein LE, Brown DH, Gullane PJ, et al. Patient education and informed consent in head and neck surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 128:1269–1274. 2002.

8. Chyatte D, Porterfield R. Functional outcome after repair of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 94:417–421. 2001.

9. Delp C, Jones J. Communicating information to patients: the use of cartoon illustrations to improve comprehension of instructions. Acad Emerg Med. 3:264–270. 1996.

10. Faden RR, Beauchamp TL. Decision-making and informed consent: a study of the impact of disclosed information. Soc Indic Res. 7:313–336. 1980.

11. Farrell EH, Whistance RN, Phillips K, Morgan B, Savage K, Lewis V, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of audio-visual information aids for informed consent for invasive healthcare procedures in clinical practice. Patient Educ Couns. 94:20–32. 2014.

12. Fellner CH, Marshall JR. Kidney donors--the myth of informed consent. Am J Psychiatry. 126:1245–1251. 1970.

13. Güresir E, Vatter H, Schuss P, Platz J, Konczalla J, de Rochement Rdu M, et al. Natural history of small unruptured anterior circulation aneurysms: a prospective cohort study. Stroke. 44:3027–3031. 2013.

14. Gutheil TG, Bursztajn H, Brodsky A. Malpractice prevention through the sharing of uncertainty. Informed consent and the therapeutic alliance. N Engl J Med. 311:49–51. 1984.

15. Hekkenberg RJ, Irish JC, Rotstein LE, Brown DH, Gullane PJ. Informed consent in head and neck surgery: how much do patients actually remember? J Otolaryngol. 26:155–159. 1997.

16. Herz DA, Looman JE, Lewis SK. Informed consent: is it a myth? Neurosurgery. 30:453–458. 1992.

17. Jones JW, McCullough LB, Richman BW. A comprehensive primer of surgical informed consent. Surg Clin North Am. 87:903–918. viii2007.

18. Juvela S, Poussa K, Lehto H, Porras M. Natural history of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a long-term follow-up study. Stroke. 44:2414–2421. 2013.

19. Katz J. Reflections on informed consent: 40 years after its birth. J Am Coll Surg. 186:466–474. 1998.

20. Kessler TM, Nachbur BH, Kessler W. Patients’ perception of preoperative information by interactive computer program-exemplified by cholecystectomy. Patient Educ Couns. 59:135–140. 2005.

21. Komotar RJ, Mocco J, Solomon RA. Guidelines for the surgical treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: the first annual J. Lawrence pool memorial research symposium--controversies in the management of cerebral aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 62:183–193. discussion 193–194. 2008.

22. Kondziolka DS, Pirris SM, Lunsford LD. Improving the informed consent process for surgery. Neurosurgery. 58:1184–1189. discussion 1184–1189. 2006.

23. Krupp W, Spanehl O, Laubach W, Seifert V. Informed consent in neurosurgery: patients’ recall of preoperative discussion. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 142:233–238. discussion 238–239. 2000.

24. Lavelle-Jones C, Byrne DJ, Rice P, Cuschieri A. Factors affecting quality of informed consent. BMJ. 306:885–890. 1993.

25. Lipetz MJ, Bussigel MN, Bannerman J, Risley B. What is wrong with patient education programs. Nurs Outlook. 38:184–189. 1990.

26. Murphy K. ISAT and ISUIA: the impact on informed consent. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 8:106–107. 2005.

27. Park J, Son W, Park KS, Kang DH, Lee J, Oh CW, et al. Educational and interactive informed consent process for treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 126:825–830. 2017.

28. Paterick TJ, Carson GV, Allen MC, Paterick TE. Medical informed consent: general considerations for physicians. Mayo Clin Proc. 83:313–319. 2008.

29. Raaymakers TW, Rinkel GJ, Limburg M, Algra A. Mortality and morbidity of surgery for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis. Stroke. 29:1531–1538. 1998.

30. Schats R, Brilstra EH, Rinkel GJ, Algra A, Van Gijn J. Informed consent in trials for neurological emergencies: the example of subarachnoid haemorrhage. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 74:988–991. 2003.

31. Shukla AN, Daly MK, Legutko P. Informed consent for cataract surgery: patient understanding of verbal, written, and videotaped information. J Cataract Refract Surg. 38:80–84. 2012.

32. Simes RJ, Tattersall MH, Coates AS, Raghavan D, Solomon HJ, Smartt H. Randomised comparison of procedures for obtaining informed consent in clinical trials of treatment for cancer. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 293:1065–1068. 1986.

33. Sonobe M, Yamazaki T, Yonekura M, Kikuchi H. Small unruptured intracranial aneurysm verification study: SUAVe study, Japan. Stroke. 41:1969–1977. 2010.

34. Thompson BG, Brown RD Jr, Amin-Hanjani S, Broderick JP, Cockroft KM, Connolly ES Jr, et al. Guidelines for the management of patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 46:2368–2400. 2015.

35. UCAS Japan Investigators. Morita A, Kirino T, Hashi K, Aoki N, Fukuhara S, et al. The natural course of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in a Japanese cohort. N Engl J Med. 366:2474–2482. 2012.

36. Wear S. Informed consent: patient autonomy and physician beneficence within clinical medicine. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers;1993.

37. Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP, Huston J 3rd, Meissner I, Brown RD Jr, Piepgras DG, et al. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet. 362:103–110. 2003.

38. Wollinger C, Hirnschall N, Findl O. Computer-based tutorial to enhance the quality and efficiency of the informed-consent process for cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 38:655–659. 2012.