Perinatology.  2017 Jun;28(2):59-68. 10.14734/PN.2017.28.2.59.

Comparison of Two Congenital Myotonic Dystrophy Groups According to the Number of CTG Trinucleotide Copies on Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Pediatrics, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea. essong@jnu.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Pediatrics, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
The aims of this study were to compare clinical characteristics and outcome of neonates with congenital myotonic dystrophy (CMD) according to the number of cytosine, thymine, guanine (CTG) copies and to analyze the relating factors for survival.
METHODS
The patients were divided into two groups; less than or equal to 1,000 CTG copies (group A) and above 1,000 CTG copies (group B). This study compared the maternal CTG copies, obstetric characteristics, and patients' clinical characteristics, morbidity, hospital course, and long term outcome between group A and B, and also analyzed the relating factors for survival.
RESULTS
The twenty-three patients were confirmed by gene analysis in the neonatal period. Nine patients (39.1%) were included in group A and fourteen patients (60.9%) in group B. There was no correlation between the number of CTG copies of the mothers and their babies. There were no significant differences in maternal obstetric characteristics, patient's clinical findings, morbidities, hospital course and mortality between group A and B. Seven patients died before discharge and six patients among 16 who survived died after discharge. Analyzing the relating factors for survival, Apgar score at 1 and 5 minute were significantly higher in patients who survived than those who expired (P=0.0001, P=0.01, respectively). All survived patients showed developmental delay and 7 patients (58.3%) failed to thrive.
CONCLUSION
There was no correlation between the number of CTG copies of the mothers and their babies. There were no statistical differences in maternal obstetric characteristics, patient's clinical findings, morbidities, hospital course, and mortality between the two groups. Apgar score at 1 minute and 5 minute were the relating factors for survival.

Keyword

Myotonic dystrophy; CTG trinucleotide copies number; Outcomes

MeSH Terms

Apgar Score
Cytosine
Guanine
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Mortality
Mothers
Myotonic Dystrophy*
Thymine
Cytosine
Guanine
Thymine

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Southern blot of long-range PCR products from the CTG copies in the DMPK gene. (A) More than 1,000 CTG copies expansion (patient of case 12), (B) 75 of CTG copies expansion (mother of case 12). The arrow indicate subject's strand of PCR products. PCR, polymerase chain reaction; CTG, cytosine, thymine, guanine; M, gene ruler-size marker; NC, normal control; PC, positive control; Sub, subject.

  • Fig. 2 Flow diagram of subjects. CMD, congenital myotonic dystrophy; CTG, cytosine, thymine, guanine.

  • Fig. 3 The relationship between CTG copies of patients and their mothers. CTG, cytosine, thymine, guanine.


Reference

1). Vanier TM. Dystrophia myotonica in childhood. Br Med J. 1960. 2:1284–8.
Article
2). Tsilfidis C., MacKenzie AE., Mettler G., Barceló J., Korneluk RG. Correlation between CTG trinucleotide repeat length and frequency of severe congenital myotonic dystrophy. Nat Genet. 1992. 1:192–5.
Article
3). Campbell C., Sherlock R., Jacob P., Blayney M. Congenital myotonic dystrophy: assisted ventilation duration and outcome. Pediatrics. 2004. 113:811–6.
Article
4). de Die-Smulders CE., Smeets HJ., Loots W., Anten HB., Mirandolle JF., Geraedts JP, et al. Paternal transmission of congenital myotonic dystrophy. J Med Genet. 1997. 34:930–3.
Article
5). Ranum LP., Cooper TA. RNA-mediated neuromuscular disorders. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2006. 29:259–77.
Article
6). Pearson CE., Nichol Edamura K., Cleary JD. Repeat instability: mechanisms of dynamic mutations. Nat Rev Genet. 2005. 6:729–42.
Article
7). Schara U., Schoser BG. Myotonic dystrophies type 1 and 2: a summary on current aspects. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2006. 13:71–9.
Article
8). Dyken PR., Harper PS. Congenital dystrophia myotonica. Neurology. 1973. 23:465–73.
Article
9). Bird TD. Myotonic dystrophy type 1. [accessed on 22 Oct 2015]. Available at. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1165.
10). Redman JB., Fenwick RG Jr., Fu YH., Pizzuti A., Caskey CT. Relationship between parental trinucleotide GCT repeat length and severity of myotonic dystrophy in offspring. JAMA. 1993. 269:1960–5.
Article
11). Kim HK., Kim JH., Lee YA., Ko TS., Kim KS., Yoo HW, et al. A case of congenital myotonic dystrophy diagnosed by molecular genetics. J Korean Child Neurol Soc. 1998. 5:356–60.
12). Kim SH., Kim EY., Park SK., Choi SJ., Lim SC. A case of congenital myotonic dystrophy diagnosed by molecular genetics. J Korean Soc Neonatol. 2006. 13:194–8.
13). Jung SH., Bang MS. Belated diagnosis of congenital myotonic dystrophy in a boy with cerebral palsy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007. 86:161–5.
Article
14). Yum MS., Lee BH., Kim GH., Lee JJ., Choi SH., Lee JY, et al. Southern analysis after long-range PCR: clinical application in Korean patients with myotonic dystrophy 1. J Genet Med. 2013. 10:33–7.
Article
15). Papile LA., Burstein J., Burstein R., Koffler H. Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: a study of infants with birth weights less than 1,500 gm. J Pediatr. 1978. 92:529–34.
Article
16). Walsh MC., Kliegman RM. Necrotizing enterocolitis: treatment based on staging criteria. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1986. 33:179–201.
Article
17). Chang YS., Ahn SY., Park WS. Committee on program and planning and advisory committee of Korean Neonatal Network. The establishment of the Korean Neonatal Network (KNN). Neonatal Med. 2013. 20:169–78.
18). Mahadevan M., Tsilfidis C., Sabourin L., Shutler G., Amemiya C., Jansen G, et al. Myotonic dystrophy mutation: an unstable CTG repeat in the 3' untranslated region of the gene. Science. 1992. 255:1253–5.
Article
19). Fu YH., Pizzuti A., Fenwick RG Jr., King J., Rajnarayan S., Dunne PW, et al. An unstable triplet repeat in a gene related to myotonic muscular dystrophy. Science. 1992. 255:1256–8.
Article
20). Campbell C. Congenital myotonic dystrophy. J Neurol Neurophysiol. 2012. S7:001.
Article
21). Harley HG., Rundle SA., MacMillan JC., Myring J., Brook JD., Crow S, et al. Size of the unstable CTG repeat sequence in relation to phenotype and parental transmission in myotonic dystrophy. Am J Hum Genet. 1993. 52:1164–74.
22). Imbert G., Kretz C., Johnson K., Mandel JL. Origin of the expansion mutation in myotonic dystrophy. Nat Genet. 1993. 4:72–6.
Article
23). Groenen P., Wieringa B. Expanding complexity in myotonic dystrophy. Bioessays. 1998. 20:901–12.
Article
24). Marchini C., Lonigro R., Verriello L., Pellizzari L., Bergonzi P., Damante G. Correlations between individual clinical manifestations and CTG repeat amplification in myotonic dystrophy. Clin Genet. 2000. 57:74–82.
Article
25). Arsenault ME., Prévost C., Lescault A., Laberge C., Puymirat J., Mathieu J. Clinical characteristics of myotonic dystrophy type 1 patients with small CTG expansions. Neurology. 2006. 66:1248–50.
Article
26). Logigian EL., Moxley RT 4th., Blood CL., Barbieri CA., Martens WB., Wiegner AW, et al. Leukocyte CTG repeat length correlates with severity of myotonia in myotonic dystrophy type 1. Neurology. 2004. 62:1081–9.
Article
27). Day JW., Ranum LP. RNA pathogenesis of the myotonic dystrophies. Neuromuscul Disord. 2005. 15:5–16.
Article
28). Schild RL., Plath H., Hofstaetter C., Brenner R., Mann E., Mundegar RR, et al. Polyhydramnios: an association with congenital myotonic dystrophy. J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998. 18:484–5.
29). Regev R., de Vries LS., Heckmatt JZ., Dubowitz V. Cerebral ventricular dilation in congenital myotonic dystrophy. J Pediatr. 1987. 111:372–6.
Article
30). Rutherford MA., Heckmatt JZ., Dubowitz V. Congenital myotonic dystrophy: respiratory function at birth determines survival. Arch Dis Child. 1989. 64:191–5.
Article
31). Fujii T., Yorifuji T., Okuno T., Toyokuni S., Okada S., Mikawa H. Congenital myotonic dystrophy with progressive edema and hypoproteinemia. Brain Dev. 1991. 13:58–60.
Article
32). Awater C., Zerres K., Rudnik-Schöneborn S. Pregnancy course and outcome in women with hereditary neuromuscular disorders: comparison of obstetric risks in 178 patients. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012. 162:153–9.
Article
33). Hamza A., Herr D., Solomayer EF., Meyberg-Solomayer G. Polyhydramnios: causes, diagnosis and therapy. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2013. 73:1241–6.
Article
34). Echenne B., Rideau A., Roubertie A., Sébire G., Rivier F., Lemieux B. Myotonic dystrophy type I in childhood long-term evolution in patients surviving the neonatal period. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2008. 12:210–23.
35). Hageman AT., Gabreëls FJ., Liem KD., Renkawek K., Boon JM. Congenital myotonic dystrophy; a report on thirteen cases and a review of the literature. J Neurol Sci. 1993. 115:95–101.
Article
36). Wesström G., Bensch J., Schollin J. Congenital myotonic dystrophy. Incidence, clinical aspects and early prognosis. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1986. 75:849–54.
37). Reardon W., Newcombe R., Fenton I., Sibert J., Harper PS. The natural history of congenital myotonic dystrophy: mortality and long term clinical aspects. Arch Dis Child. 1993. 68:177–81.
Article
38). Roig M., Balliu PR., Navarro C., Brugera R., Losada M. Presentation, clinical course, and outcome of the congenital form of myotonic dystrophy. Pediatr Neurol. 1994. 11:208–13.
Article
39). Connolly MB., Roland EH., Hill A. Clinical features for prediction of survival in neonatal muscle disease. Pediatr Neurol. 1992. 8:285–8.
Article
40). Keller C., Reynolds A., Lee B., Garcia-Prats J. Congenital myotonic dystrophy requiring prolonged endotracheal and noninvasive assisted ventilation: not a uniformly fatal condition. Pediatrics. 1998. 101(4 Pt 1):704–6.
Article
Full Text Links
  • PN
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr