Obstet Gynecol Sci.  2017 Jul;60(4):323-328. 10.5468/ogs.2017.60.4.323.

Clinical characteristics of pregnancies complicated by congenital myotonic dystrophy

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. ohsymd@skku.edu
  • 2Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
Although the conventional prevalence of myotonic dystrophy is 1:8,000, the prevalence in Korean population was recently reported as 1:1,245. With higher domestic result than expected, we aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics of pregnancies complicated by congenital myotonic dystrophy in our institution.
METHODS
We have reviewed 11 paired cases of neonates diagnosed with congenital myotonic dystrophy and their mothers between July 2004 and May 2014, with clinical features including maternal history of infertility, prenatal ultrasonographic findings, and neonatal outcomes. Cytosine-thymine-guanine (CTG) repeat expansion in the myotonic dystrophy protein kinase gene of both neonates and their mothers was also examined.
RESULTS
None of mother was aware of their myotonic dystrophy traits before pregnancy. History of infertility followed by assisted reproductive technology accounted for 57.1% (4/7). Distinctive prenatal ultrasonographic finding was severe idiopathic polyhydramnios (66.7%, 4/6) with median amniotic fluid index of 43 (range, 37 to 66). In 37.5% (3/8) cases, decreased fetal movement was evident during prenatal ultrasound examination. For neonatal outcomes, more than half (6/11) were complicated with preterm birth and the proportion of 1-minute Apgar score <4 and 5-minute Apgar score <7 was 44.4% (4/9) and 66.7% (6/9), respectively. Most of neonates were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (9/10) because of hypotonia with respiratory problems and there was one infant death. Median number of cytosine-thymine-guanine repeats in mothers and neonates was 400 (range, 166 to 1,000) and 1,300 (range, 700 to 2,000), respectively.
CONCLUSION
Our data suggest that severe idiopathic polyhydramnios with decreased fetal movement in pregnant women, especially with a history of infertility, requires differential diagnosis of congenital myotonic dystrophy.

Keyword

Fetal movement; Infertility; Myotonic dystrophy; Polyhydramnios; Prenatal diagnosis

MeSH Terms

Amniotic Fluid
Apgar Score
Diagnosis, Differential
Female
Fetal Movement
Humans
Infant Death
Infant, Newborn
Infertility
Intensive Care, Neonatal
Mothers
Muscle Hypotonia
Myotonic Dystrophy*
Myotonin-Protein Kinase
Polyhydramnios
Pregnancy*
Pregnant Women
Premature Birth
Prenatal Diagnosis
Prevalence
Reproductive Techniques, Assisted
Ultrasonography
Myotonin-Protein Kinase

Reference

1. Barnes PR. Clinical and genetic aspects of myotonic dystrophy. Br J Hosp Med. 1993; 50:22–30.
2. Mahadevan M, Tsilfidis C, Sabourin L, Shutler G, Amemiya C, Jansen G, et al. Myotonic dystrophy mutation: an unstable CTG repeat in the 3′ untranslated region of the gene. Science. 1992; 255:1253–1255.
3. López de Munain A, Blanco A, Emparanza JI, Marti Masso JF, Cobo A, Basauri B, et al. Anticipation in myotonic dystrophy: a parental-sex-related phenomenon. Neuroepidemiology. 1994; 13:75–78.
4. Logigian EL, Moxley RT 4th, Blood CL, Barbieri CA, Martens WB, Wiegner AW, et al. Leukocyte CTG repeat length correlates with severity of myotonia in myotonic dystrophy type 1. Neurology. 2004; 62:1081–1089.
5. Udd B, Krahe R. The myotonic dystrophies: molecular, clinical, and therapeutic challenges. Lancet Neurol. 2012; 11:891–905.
6. Meola G. Clinical aspects, molecular pathomechanisms and management of myotonic dystrophies. Acta Myol. 2013; 32:154–165.
7. Harper PS. Congenital myotonic dystrophy in Britain. I. Clinical aspects. Arch Dis Child. 1975; 50:505–513.
8. Davies J, Yamagata H, Shelbourne P, Buxton J, Ogihara T, Nokelainen P, et al. Comparison of the myotonic dystrophy associated CTG repeat in European and Japanese populations. J Med Genet. 1992; 29:766–769.
9. Harper PS. Myotonic dystrophy. 3rd ed. London (UK): WB Saunders;2001.
10. Jang JH, Lee JW, Cho EH, Lee EH, Kim JW, Ki CS. Frequency of DMPK mutation carriers in Korean women of childbearing age. Clin Genet. 2014; 86:398–399.
11. Prior TW. American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee. Technical standards and guidelines for myotonic dystrophy type 1 testing. Genet Med. 2009; 11:552–555.
12. Kamsteeg EJ, Kress W, Catalli C, Hertz JM, Witsch-Baumgartner M, Buckley MF, et al. Best practice guidelines and recommendations on the molecular diagnosis of myotonic dystrophy types 1 and 2. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012; 20:1203–1208.
13. Zaki M, Boyd PA, Impey L, Roberts A, Chamberlain P. Congenital myotonic dystrophy: prenatal ultrasound findings and pregnancy outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 29:284–288.
14. Rudnik-Schoneborn S, Zerres K. Outcome in pregnancies complicated by myotonic dystrophy: a study of 31 patients and review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004; 114:44–53.
15. Leonard RJ, Kendall KA, Johnson R, McKenzie S. Swallowing in myotonic muscular dystrophy: a videofluoroscopic study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001; 82:979–985.
16. Theadom A, Rodrigues M, Roxburgh R, Balalla S, Higgins C, Bhattacharjee R, et al. Prevalence of muscular dystrophies: a systematic literature review. Neuroepidemiology. 2014; 43:259–268.
17. Harper PS. Myotonic dystrophy and other autosomal muscular dystrophies. In : Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, Valle D, editors. The metabolic and molecular basis of inherited disease. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill;1995. p. 4227–4253.
18. Srebnik N, Margalioth EJ, Rabinowitz R, Varshaver I, Altarescu G, Renbaum P, et al. Ovarian reserve and PGD treatment outcome in women with myotonic dystrophy. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014; 29:94–101.
19. Verpoest W, Seneca S, De Rademaeker M, Sermon K, De Rycke M, De Vos M, et al. The reproductive outcome of female patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) undergoing PGD is not affected by the size of the expanded CTG repeat tract. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010; 27:327–333.
20. Sholl JS, Hughey MJ, Hirschmann RA. Myotonic muscular dystrophy associated with ritodrine tocolysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985; 151:83–86.
21. Nasu K, Sugano T, Yoshimatsu J, Narahara H. Rhabdomyolysis caused by tocolysis with oral ritodrine hydrochloride in a pregnant patient with myotonic dystrophy. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2006; 61:53–55.
22. Catanzarite V, Gambling D, Bird LM, Honold J, Perkins E. Respiratory compromise after MgSO4 therapy for preterm labor in a woman with myotonic dystrophy: a case report. J Reprod Med. 2008; 53:220–222.
23. Sparks SE. Neonatal hypotonia. Clin Perinatol. 2015; 42:363–371.
Full Text Links
  • OGS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr