Anesth Pain Med.  2017 Apr;12(2):97-102. 10.17085/apm.2017.12.2.97.

Management of hypotension after spinal anesthesia administered for caesarean section

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Konyang University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea. jisaac@naver.com

Abstract

Spinal anesthesia is widely used for parturients undergoing scheduled elective caesarean section. Hypotension associated with spinal anesthesia is a major concern in obstetrics. Preventive methods for post-spinal hypotension include intravenous fluid preloading, bolus or continuous injection of vasopressors. Intravenous fluid preloading reduces the incidence and severity of maternal hypotension during spinal anesthesia administered for cesarean section. Although fluid preloading prevents maternal hypotension, it is not advisable to delay spinal anesthesia for preloading a fixed volume of intravenous fluid. Ephedrine, the drug of choice to prevent maternal hypotension during spinal anesthesia for caesarean delivery, acts by maintaining the uteroplacental blood flow. Phenylephrine is also effective in reducing maternal hypotension during this procedure. Both the vasopressors are acceptable for preventing hypotension. However, in the absence of maternal bradycardia, phenylephrine is the preferred drug for the management of hypotension during regional anesthesia for caesarean section, because of its improved fetal acid-base status.

Keyword

Caesarean section; Ephedrine; Hypotension; Phenylephrine; Spinal anesthesia

MeSH Terms

Anesthesia, Conduction
Anesthesia, Spinal*
Bradycardia
Cesarean Section*
Ephedrine
Female
Hypotension*
Incidence
Obstetrics
Phenylephrine
Pregnancy
Ephedrine
Phenylephrine

Reference

1. Goetzl LM. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Clinical Management Guidelines for Obstetrician-Gynecologists Number 36, July 2002. Obstetric analgesia and anesthesia. Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 100:177–91. DOI: 10.1016/S0029-7844(02)02156-7.
2. Hawkins JL, Chang J, Palmer SK, Gibbs CP, Callaghan WM. Anesthesia-related maternal mortality in the United States 1979-2002. Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 117:69–74. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820093a9. PMID: 21173646.
3. Kinsella SM, Lohmann G. Supine hypotensive syndrome. Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 83:774–88. PMID: 8164943.
4. Eckstein KL, Marx GF. Aortocaval compression and uterine displacement. Anesthesiology. 1974; 40:92–6. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-197401000-00025.
5. Hughes SC, Levinson G, Rosen MA. Shnider and Levinson’s anesthesia for obstetrics. 2002. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;p. 136–7. PMID: 11894080.
6. Clemetson CA, Hassan R, Mallikarjuneswara VR, Wallace G. Tilt-bend cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol. 1973; 42:290–8. PMID: 4721420.
7. Colon-Morales MA. A self-supporting device for continuous left uterine displacement during cesarean section. Anesth Analg. 1970; 49:223–4. DOI: 10.1213/00000539-197003000-00008. PMID: 5534624.
8. Bhagwanjee S, Rocke DA, Rout CC, Koovarjee RV, Brijball R. Prevention of hypotension following spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section by wrapping of the legs. Br J Anaesth. 1990; 65:819–22. DOI: 10.1093/bja/65.6.819. PMID: 2265052.
9. Clark RB, Thompson DS, Thompson CH. Prevention of spinal hypotension associated with Cesarean section. Anesthesiology. 1976; 45:670–4. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-197612000-00018. PMID: 984486.
10. Greiss FC, Crandell DL. Therapy for hypotension induced by spinal anesthesia during pregnancy:observations on gravid ewes. JAMA. 1965; 191:793–6. DOI: 10.1001/jama.1965.03080100011002.
11. Wollman SB, Marx GF. Acute hydration for prevention of hypotension of spinal anesthesia in parturients. Anesthesiology. 1968; 29:374–80. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-196803000-00024.
12. Jackson R, Reid JA, Thorburn J. Volume preloading is not essential to prevent spinal-induced hypotension at caesarean section. Br J Anaesth. 1995; 75:262–5. DOI: 10.1093/bja/75.3.262. PMID: 7547039.
13. Rout CC, Akoojee SS, Rocke DA, Gouws E. Rapid administration of crystalloid preload does not decrease the incidence of hypotension after spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section. Br J Anaesth. 1992; 68:394–7. DOI: 10.1093/bja/68.4.394. PMID: 1642918.
14. Ueyama H, He YL, Tanigami H, Mashimo T, Yoshiya I. Effects of crystalloid and colloid preload on blood volume in the parturient undergoing spinal anesthesia for elective Cesarean section. Anesthesiology. 1999; 91:1571–6. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199912000-00006. PMID: 10598596.
15. MacLennan FM, MacDonald AF, Campbell DM. Lung water during the puerperium. Anaesthesia. 1987; 42:141–7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1987.tb02986.x. PMID: 3826587.
16. Jee YS, Hong JY, Yoon HJ, Kim MJ, Lee JY. The effects of volume preloading on spinal anesthesia for elective caesarean section. Anesth Pain Med. 2006; 1:40–3.
17. Mathru M, Rao TL, Kartha RK, Shanmugham M, Jacobs HK. Intravenous albumin administration for prevention of spinal hypotension during cesarean section. Anesth Analg. 1980; 59:655–8. DOI: 10.1213/00000539-198009000-00003. PMID: 7191222.
18. Riley ET, Cohen SE, Rubenstein AJ, Flanagan B. Prevention of hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section:six percent hetastarch versus lactated Ringer’s solution. Anesth Analg. 1995; 81:838–42. DOI: 10.1213/00000539-199510000-00031. DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199510000-00031. PMID: 7574020.
19. French GW, White JB, Howell SJ, Popat M. Comparison of pentastarch and Hartmann’s solution for volume preloading in spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section. Br J Anaesth. 1999; 83:475–7. DOI: 10.1093/bja/83.3.475. PMID: 10655924.
20. Lin CS, Lin TY, Huang CH, Lin YH, Lin CR, Chan WH, et al. Prevention of hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section:dextran 40 versus lactated Ringer’s solution. Acta Anaesthesiol Sin. 1999; 37:55–9. PMID: 10410403.
21. Kim CS, Ahn HJ, Shin SH, Choi DH. Prevention of hypotension with crystalloid versus colloid during spinal or combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2004; 46:408–13. DOI: 10.4097/kjae.2004.46.4.408.
22. Practice Guidelines for Obstetric Anesthesia:An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia and the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology. Anesthesiology. 2016; 124:270–300. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000935. PMID: 26580836.
23. Ralston DH, Shnider SM, DeLorimier AA. Effects of equipotent ephedrine, metaraminol, mephentermine, and methoxamine on uterine blood flow in the pregnant ewe. Anesthesiology. 1974; 40:354–70. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-197404000-00009. PMID: 4819091.
24. Morgan P. The role of vasopressors in the management of hypotension induced by spinal and epidural anaesthesia. Can J Anaesth. 1994; 41:404–13. DOI: 10.1007/BF03009863. PMID: 8055608.
25. King SW, Rosen MA. Prophylactic ephedrine and hypotension associated with spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Int J Obstet Anesth. 1998; 7:18–22. DOI: 10.1016/S0959-289X(98)80023-X.
26. Tsen LC, Boosalis P, Segal S, Datta S, Bader AM. Hemodynamic effects of simultaneous administration of intravenous ephedrine and spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. J Clin Anesth. 2000; 12:378–82. DOI: 10.1016/S0952-8180(00)00176-8.
27. Ngan Kee WD, Khaw KS, Lee BB, Lau TK, Gin T. A dose-response study of prophylactic intravenous ephedrine for the prevention of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 2000; 90:1390–5. DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200006000-00024. PMID: 10825326.
28. Lee A, Ngan Kee WD, Gin T. A dose-response meta-analysis of prophylactic intravenous ephedrine for the prevention of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 2004; 98:483–90. DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000096183.49619.FC. PMID: 14742392.
29. Lee A, Ngan Kee WD, Gin T. A quantitative, systematic review of randomized controlled trials of ephedrine versus phenylephrine for the management of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 2002; 94:920–6. DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200204000-00028. PMID: 11916798.
30. Ngan Kee WD, Khaw KS, Ng FF, Lee BB. Prophylactic phenylephrine infusion for preventing hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 2004; 98:815–21. DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000099782.78002.30. PMID: 14980943.
31. Jung SW, Kim EJ, Min BW, Ban JS, Lee SG, Lee JH. Comparison of maternal and fetal effects of ephedrine and phenylephrine infusion during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2006; 51:335–42. DOI: 10.4097/kjae.2006.51.3.335.
32. Mercier FJ, Riley ET, Frederickson WL, Roger-Christoph S, Benhamou D, Cohen SE. Phenylephrine added to prophylactic ephedrine infusion during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section. Anesthesiology. 2001; 95:668–74. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200109000-00020. PMID: 11575540.
33. Ngan Kee WD, Lee A, Khaw KS, Ng FF, Karmakar MK, Gin T. A randomized double-blinded comparison of phenylephrine and ephedrine infusion combinations to maintain blood pressure during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery:the effects on fetal acid-base status and hemodynamic control. Anesth Analg. 2008; 107:1295–302. DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31818065bc. PMID: 18806043.
34. Ngan Kee WD, Khaw KS, Tan PE, Ng FF, Karmakar MK. Placental transfer and fetal metabolic effects of phenylephrine and ephedrine during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology. 2009; 111:506–12. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181b160a3. PMID: 19672175.
Full Text Links
  • APM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr