Korean J Neurotrauma.  2015 Oct;11(2):100-105. 10.13004/kjnt.2015.11.2.100.

Analysis of the Risk Factors Affecting the Surgical Site Infection after Cranioplasty Following Decompressive Craniectomy

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Korea. gnuhpis@gnu.ac.kr
  • 2Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea.

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
The risk factors for surgical site infections (SSIs) after cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy remain unclear. The goal of this study was to analyze the risk factors related to developing SSIs after cranioplasty and to suggest valuable predictors.
METHODS
A retrospective review was conducted of patients who underwent cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy at our institution from January 2011 to December 2014, a total of 78 patients who underwent 78 cranioplasties. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were carried out to determine possible risk factors related to developing SSIs. We analyzed both patient-specific and surgery-specific factors.
RESULTS
The overall rate of SSIs was 9.0% (7/78). SSIs after cranioplasty were significantly related to being female, having the primary etiology of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and having had a bilateral cranioplasty in the univariate analysis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that being female [odds ratio (OR) 5.98, p=0.000] and having had a bilateral cranioplasty (OR 4.00, p=0.001) significantly increased the risk of SSIs.
CONCLUSION
Based on our data, cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy is associated with a high incidence of SSI. Being female, having a primary etiology of TBI and having had a bilateral cranioplasty may be risk factors for surgical site infections after cranioplasty.

Keyword

Decompressive craniectomy; Cranioplasty; Surgical wound infection; Risk factor

MeSH Terms

Brain Injuries
Decompressive Craniectomy*
Female
Humans
Incidence
Logistic Models
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors*
Surgical Wound Infection

Reference

1. Agner C, Dujovny M, Gaviria M. Neurocognitive assessment before and after cranioplasty. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2002; 144:1033–1040. discussion 1040PMID: 12382131.
Article
2. Archavlis E, Carvi Y Nievas M. The impact of timing of cranioplasty in patients with large cranial defects after decompressive hemicraniectomy. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012; 154:1055–1062. PMID: 22527574.
Article
3. Beauchamp KM, Kashuk J, Moore EE, Bolles G, Rabb C, Seinfeld J, et al. Cranioplasty after postinjury decompressive craniectomy: is timing of the essence? J Trauma. 2010; 69:270–274. PMID: 20699735.
Article
4. Bullock MR, Chesnut R, Ghajar J, Gordon D, Hartl R, Newell DW, et al. Surgical management of acute subdural hematomas. Neurosurgery. 2006; 58(3 Suppl):S16–S24. discussion Si-SivPMID: 16710968.
Article
5. Chang V, Hartzfeld P, Langlois M, Mahmood A, Seyfried D. Outcomes of cranial repair after craniectomy. J Neurosurg. 2010; 112:1120–1124. PMID: 19612971.
Article
6. Cheng YK, Weng HH, Yang JT, Lee MH, Wang TC, Chang CN. Factors affecting graft infection after cranioplasty. J Clin Neurosci. 2008; 15:1115–1119. PMID: 18656363.
Article
7. Chibbaro S, Di Rocco F, Mirone G, Fricia M, Makiese O, Di Emidio P, et al. Decompressive craniectomy and early cranioplasty for the management of severe head injury: a prospective multicenter study on 147 patients. World Neurosurg. 2011; 75:558–562. PMID: 21600512.
Article
8. Di Stefano C, Sturiale C, Trentini P, Bonora R, Rossi D, Cervigni G, et al. Unexpected neuropsychological improvement after cranioplasty: a case series study. Br J Neurosurg. 2012; 26:827–831. PMID: 22702390.
Article
9. Gooch MR, Gin GE, Kenning TJ, German JW. Complications of cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy: analysis of 62 cases. Neurosurg Focus. 2009; 26:E9. PMID: 19485722.
Article
10. Honeybul S, Ho KM, Lind CR, Gillett GR. Validation of the CRASH model in the prediction of 18-month mortality and unfavorable outcome in severe traumatic brain injury requiring decompressive craniectomy. J Neurosurg. 2014; 120:1131–1137. PMID: 24605836.
Article
11. Honeybul S, Janzen C, Kruger K, Ho KM. The impact of cranioplasty on neurological function. Br J Neurosurg. 2013; 27:636–641. PMID: 23883370.
Article
12. Howard JL, Cipolle MD, Anderson M, Sabella V, Shollenberger D, Li PM, et al. Outcome after decompressive craniectomy for the treatment of severe traumatic brain injury. J Trauma. 2008; 65:380–385. discussion 385-386PMID: 18695475.
Article
13. Huang YH, Yang TM, Lee TC, Chen WF, Yang KY. Acute autologous bone flap infection after cranioplasty for postinjury decompressive craniectomy. Injury. 2013; 44:44–47. PMID: 22154044.
Article
14. Jho DH, Neckrysh S, Hardman J, Charbel FT, Amin-Hanjani S. Ethylene oxide gas sterilization: a simple technique for storing explanted skull bone. J Neurosurg. 2007; 107:440–445. PMID: 17695404.
Article
15. Kim H, Sung SO, Kim SJ, Kim SR, Park IS, Jo KW. Analysis of the factors affecting graft infection after cranioplasty. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2013; 155:2171–2176. PMID: 24043415.
Article
16. Lee CH, Chung YS, Lee SH, Yang HJ, Son YJ. Analysis of the factors influencing bone graft infection after cranioplasty. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012; 73:255–260. PMID: 22743392.
Article
17. Lu Y, Hui G, Liu F, Wang Z, Tang Y, Gao S. Survival and regeneration of deep-freeze preserved autologous cranial bones after cranioplasty. Br J Neurosurg. 2012; 26:216–221. PMID: 22103564.
Article
18. Matsuno A, Tanaka H, Iwamuro H, Takanashi S, Miyawaki S, Nakashima M, et al. Analyses of the factors influencing bone graft infection after delayed cranioplasty. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2006; 148:535–540. discussion 540PMID: 16467959.
Article
19. Morina A, Kelmendi F, Morina Q, Dragusha S, Ahmeti F, Morina D, et al. Cranioplasty with subcutaneously preserved autologous bone grafts in abdominal wall-Experience with 75 cases in a post-war country Kosova. Surg Neurol Int. 2011; 2:72. PMID: 21697987.
Article
20. Nagayama K, Yoshikawa G, Somekawa K, Kohno M, Segawa H, Sano K, et al. [Cranioplasty using the patient's autogenous bone preserved by freezing--an examination of post-operative infection rates]. No Shinkei Geka. 2002; 30:165–169. PMID: 11857940.
21. Rish BL, Dillon JD, Meirowsky AM, Caveness WF, Mohr JP, Kistler JP, et al. Cranioplasty: a review of 1030 cases of penetrating head injury. Neurosurgery. 1979; 4:381–385. PMID: 111153.
22. Saade N, Veiga JC, Cannoni LF, Haddad L, Araújo JL. Evaluation of prognostic factors of decompressive craniectomy in the treatment of severe traumatic brain injury. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2014; 41:256–262. PMID: 25295986.
Article
23. Simard JM, Sahuquillo J, Sheth KN, Kahle KT, Walcott BP. Managing malignant cerebral infarction. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2011; 13:217–229. PMID: 21190097.
Article
24. Smith ER, Carter BS, Ogilvy CS. Proposed use of prophylactic decompressive craniectomy in poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients presenting with associated large sylvian hematomas. Neurosurgery. 2002; 51:117–124. discussion 124PMID: 12182408.
Article
25. Thavarajah D, De Lacy P, Hussien A, Sugar A. The minimum time for cranioplasty insertion from craniectomy is six months to reduce risk of infection--a case series of 82 patients. Br J Neurosurg. 2012; 26:78–80. PMID: 21973063.
26. Tokoro K, Chiba Y, Tsubone K. Late infection after cranioplasty--review of 14 cases. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 1989; 29:196–201. PMID: 2477724.
27. Wachter D, Reineke K, Behm T, Rohde V. Cranioplasty after decompressive hemicraniectomy: underestimated surgery-associated complications? Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013; 115:1293–1297. PMID: 23273384.
Article
28. Walcott BP, Kwon CS, Sheth SA, Fehnel CR, Koffie RM, Asaad WF, et al. Predictors of cranioplasty complications in stroke and trauma patients. J Neurosurg. 2013; 118:757–762. PMID: 23394335.
Article
29. Wiggins A, Austerberry R, Morrison D, Ho KM, Honeybul S. Cranioplasty with custom-made titanium plates--14 years experience. Neurosurgery. 2013; 72:248–256. discussion 256PMID: 23149967.
Article
30. Yadla S, Campbell PG, Chitale R, Maltenfort MG, Jabbour P, Sharan AD. Effect of early surgery, material, and method of flap preservation on cranioplasty infections: a systematic review. Neurosurgery. 2011; 68:1124–1129. discussion 1130PMID: 21242830.
Article
31. Yamaura A, Sato M, Meguro K, Nakamura T, Uemura K. [Cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy--analysis of 300 cases (author's transl)]. No Shinkei Geka. 1977; 5:345–353. PMID: 558536.
Full Text Links
  • KJN
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr