Korean J Gastroenterol.  2015 May;65(5):273-282. 10.4166/kjg.2015.65.5.273.

Long-term Outcomes of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Singlecenter Retrospective Analysis

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Gastroenterology, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Busan, Korea.
  • 2Department of Colorectal Surgery, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Busan, Korea. gsabk@hotmail.com
  • 3Department of Neuropsychiatry, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Busan, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS
Laparoscopic surgery has been proven to be an effective alternative to open surgery in patients with colon cancer. However, data on laparoscopic surgery in patients with rectal cancer are insufficient. The aim of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer.
METHODS
A total of 307 patients with rectal cancer who were treated by open and laparoscopic curative resection at Kosin University Gospel Hospital (Busan, Korea) between January 2002 and December 2011 were reviewed retrospectively.
RESULTS
Regarding treatment, 176 patients underwent an open procedure and 131 patients underwent a laparoscopic procedure. The local recurrence rate after laparoscopic resection was 2.3%, compared with 5.7% after open resection (p=0.088). Distant metastases occurred in 6.9% of the laparoscopic surgery group, compared with 24.4% in the open surgery group (p<0.001). In univariate analysis, age (> or =75 years vs. < or =60 years), preoperative staging, surgical approach (open vs. laparoscopic), elevated initial CEA level, elevated follow-up CEA level, number of positive lymph nodes, and postoperative chemotherapy affected overall survival and disease free survival. However, in multivariate analysis, the surgical approach apparently did not affect long-term oncologic outcome.
CONCLUSIONS
In this study, long-term outcomes after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer were not inferior to those after open surgery. Therefore, laparoscopic surgery would be an alternative operative tool to open resection for rectal cancer, although further investigation is needed.

Keyword

Rectal neoplasms; Conversion to open surgery; Laparoscopy

MeSH Terms

Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use
Combined Modality Therapy
Disease-Free Survival
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
*Laparoscopy
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Neoplasm Staging
Positron-Emission Tomography
Rectal Neoplasms/mortality/*surgery/therapy
Retrospective Studies
Survival Rate
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Treatment Outcome
Antineoplastic Agents

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Comparison of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) according to preoperative staging between open surgery group and laparoscopic surgery group. (A) Stage 1. (B) Stage 2. (C) Stage 3.

  • Fig. 2. Comparison of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) according to tumor location between open surgery group and laparoscopic surgery group. (A) Upper (11–15 cm from anal verge). (B) Middle (6–10 cm from anal verge). (C) Lower (≤5 cm from anal verge).


Reference

References

1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011; 61:69–90.
Article
2. Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014; 64:9–29.
Article
3. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010; 127:2893–2917.
Article
4. Kapiteijn E, Kranenbarg EK, Steup WH, et al. Total mesorectal excision (TME) with or without preoperative radiotherapy in the treatment of primary rectal cancer. Prospective randomised trial with standard operative and histopathological techniques. Dutch ColoRectal Cancer Group. Eur J Surg. 1999; 165:410–420.
5. Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, et al. German Rectal Cancer Study Group. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351:1731–1740.
Article
6. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350:2050–2059.
7. Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, et al. Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group. Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009; 10:44–52.
8. Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, et al. UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25:3061–3068.
Article
9. Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non- metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002; 359:2224–2229.
10. Delaney CP, Chang E, Senagore AJ, Broder M. Clinical outcomes and resource utilization associated with laparoscopic and open colectomy using a large national database. Ann Surg. 2008; 247:819–824.
Article
11. Kemp JA, Finlayson SR. Outcomes of laparoscopic and open colectomy: a national population-based comparison. Surg Innov. 2008; 15:277–283.
Article
12. da Luz Moreira A, Mor I, Geisler DP, Remzi FH, Kiran RP. Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: a case-matched study. Surg Endosc. 2011; 25:278–283.
Article
13. Lujan J, Valero G, Biondo S, Espin E, Parrilla P, Ortiz H. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: results of a prospective multicentre analysis of 4,970 patients. Surg Endosc. 2013; 27:295–302.
Article
14. Ng SS, Lee JF, Yiu RY, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted versus open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for mid and low rectal cancer: a prospective, randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2014; 28:297–306.
Article
15. Seshadri RA, Srinivasan A, Tapkire R, Swaminathan R. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a matched case-control study of short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2012; 26:154–161.
Article
16. Jeong SY, Park JW, Nam BH, et al. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open- label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014; 15:767–774.
17. van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, et al. COlorectal cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection II (COLOR II) Study Group. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013; 14:210–218.
Article
18. Ng SS, Leung KL, Lee JF, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted versus open abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008; 15:2418–2425.
Article
19. Chiang JM, Hsieh PS, Chen JS, Tang R, You JF, Yeh CY. Rectal cancer level significantly affects rates and patterns of distant metastases among rectal cancer patients post curative-intent surgery without neoadjuvant therapy. World J Surg Oncol. 2014; 12:197.
Article
20. Tarantino I, Warschkow R, Worni M, et al. Elevated preoperative CEA is associated with worse survival in stage I-III rectal cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2012; 107:266–274.
Article
21. Das P, Skibber JM, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, et al. Predictors of tumor response and downstaging in patients who receive preoperative chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Cancer. 2007; 109:1750–1755.
Article
22. Baik SH, Gincherman M, Mutch MG, Birnbaum EH, Fleshman JW. Laparoscopic vs open resection for patients with rectal can,!cer: comparison of perioperative outcomes and long-term survival. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011; 54:6–14.
Article
23. Braga M, Frasson M, Vignali A, Zuliani W, Capretti G, Di Carlo V. Laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer patients: outcome and cost-benefit analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007; 50:464–471.
Article
24. Laurent C, Leblanc F, Wütrich P, Scheffler M, Rullier E. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: long-term oncologic results. Ann Surg. 2009; 250:54–61.
25. Lujan J, Valero G, Hernandez Q, Sanchez A, Frutos MD, Parrilla P. Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2009; 96:982–989.
Article
26. Irvin TT. Prognosis of colorectal cancer in the elderly. Br J Surg. 1988; 75:419–421.
Article
27. Mulcahy HE, Patchett SE, Daly L, O'Donoghue DP. Prognosis of elderly patients with large bowel cancer. Br J Surg. 1994; 81:736–738.
Article
28. Colorectal Cancer Collaborative Group. Surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a systematic review. Lancet. 2000; 356:968–974.
29. Vironen JH, Sainio P, Husa AI, Kellokumpu IH. Complications and survival after surgery for rectal cancer in patients younger than and aged 75 years or older. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004; 47:1225–1231.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJG
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr