1. Lee EH, Park B, Kim NS, Seo HJ, Ko KL, Min JW, et al. The Korean guideline for breast cancer screening. J Korean Med Assoc. 2015; 58:408–419.
2. Kanal KM, Krupinski E, Berns EA, Geiser WR, Karellas A, Mainiero MB, et al. ACR-AAPM-SIIM practice guideline for determinants of image quality in digital mammography. J Digit Imaging. 2013; 26:10–25.
3. Kamitani T, Yabuuchi H, Soeda H, Matsuo Y, Okafuji T, Sakai S, et al. Detection of masses and microcalcifications of breast cancer on digital mammograms: comparison among hard-copy film, 3-megapixel liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors and 5-megapixel LCD monitors: an observer performance study. Eur Radiol. 2007; 17:1365–1371.
4. Yamada T, Suzuki A, Uchiyama N, Ohuchi N, Takahashi S. Diagnostic performance of detecting breast cancer on computed radiographic (CR) mammograms: comparison of hard copy film, 3-megapixel liquid-crystal-display (LCD) monitor and 5-megapixel LCD monitor. Eur Radiol. 2008; 18:2363–2369.
5. Kamitani T, Yabuuchi H, Matsuo Y, Setoguchi T, Sakai S, Okafuji T, et al. Diagnostic performance in differentiation of breast lesion on digital mammograms: comparison among hard-copy film, 3-megapixel LCD monitor, and 5-megapixel LCD monitor. Clin Imaging. 2011; 35:341–345.
6. Ong AH, Pitman AG, Tan SY, Gledhill S, Hennessy O, Lui B, et al. Comparison of 3MP medical-grade to 1MP office-grade LCD monitors in mammographic diagnostic and perceptual performance. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2011; 55:153–162.
7. Geijer H, Geijer M, Forsberg L, Kheddache S, Sund P. Comparison of color LCD and medical-grade monochrome LCD displays in diagnostic radiology. J Digit Imaging. 2007; 20:114–121.
8. Wu J, Wu TH, Han RP, Chang SJ, Shih CT, Sun JY, et al. Comparison of the commercial color LCD and the medical monochrome LCD using randomized object test patterns. PLoS One. 2012; 7:e37769.
9. Chen Y, James JJ, Turnbull AE, Gale AG. The use of lower resolution viewing devices for mammographic interpretation: implications for education and training. Eur Radiol. 2015; 25:3003–3008.
10. Diagnostic Display Monitor Management & QC. 2008. p. 75–81.
11. Son GG, Sung DW, Jeong JH, Kang HD, Lee JR, Jung HK. A study on the usefulness of the AAPM TG18 evaluation tool for diagnostic monitor QC. J Korean Radiol Soc. 2008; 58:631–638.
12. Song SE, Seo BK, Yie A, Ku BK, Kim HY, Cho KR, et al. Which phantom is better for assessing the image quality in full-field digital mammography?: American College of Radiology accreditation phantom versus digital mammography accreditation phantom. Korean J Radiol. 2012; 13:776–783.