Perinatology.  2016 Dec;27(4):244-250. 10.14734/PN.2016.27.4.244.

Clinical Outcomes of Renal Pelvis Dilatation in Very Low Birth Weight Infants

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Pediatrics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. smlee@yuhs.ac

Abstract

PURPOSE
The aim of this study was to evaluate this clinical outcome of neonatal pelvis dilatation in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants.
METHODS
The medical records of 127 VLBW infants admitted to two neonatal intensive care units from January 2012 to December 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Renal pelvis dilatation was diagnosed via ultrasound examination with cases divided into 3 groups: mild (dilatation of 5-10 mm), moderate (11-15 mm) and severe (≥15 mm). The correlation between the 3 dilatation groups and progression into hydronephrosis was evaluated.
RESULTS
Among the 127 premature infants, renal pelvis dilatation was identified in 29 (22.8%) on ultrasound examination performed, on average 13.3 days after birth, combined with calyceal ectasia in 5 (3.9%) infants. At a postmenstrual age of 40 weeks, 18 infants (14.2%) had renal pelvis dilatation, 6 (5%) infants accompanied by a dilatation of the calyx. On the last follow-up performed when children were not older than 2 years old, renal pelvis dilatation had resolved to within normal limits in 23 (79%) infants while persisting in 6 (21%) infants; 1 mild, 3 moderate, and 2 severe pelvis dilatation. The median time-to-recovery of dilatation was 10.5 months (Kaplan-Meier curve), regardless of the severity of dilatation at birth. Based on receiver operating curve analysis, a cutoff diameter of renal dilatation at birth of 11.35 mm predicted persisting severe dilatation at the final follow-up (sensitivity 83.3%, specificity 82.6%).
CONCLUSION
Although premature infants with dilatation of mild severity were all recovered, some of those with moderate-to-severe dilatation progressed to hydronephrosis. Therefore careful follow-up of premature infants with renal pelvis dilatation is recommended.

Keyword

Hydronephrosis; Premature infant; Renal pelvis dilatation; Very low birth weight

MeSH Terms

Child
Dilatation*
Dilatation, Pathologic
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Hydronephrosis
Infant*
Infant, Newborn
Infant, Premature
Infant, Very Low Birth Weight*
Intensive Care Units, Neonatal
Kidney Pelvis*
Medical Records
Parturition
Pelvis
Retrospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Ultrasonography

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Ultrasound findings of pelvis dilatation. (A) severe pelvis dilatation (B) moderate pelvis dilatation (C) mild pelvis dilatation.

  • Fig. 2 Clinical progress of the infants with renal pelvis dilatation. Abbreviation: PMA, postmenstural age.

  • Fig. 3 Days to the recovery of renal pelvis dilatation in VLBW infants using Kaplan Meier curves. Quartile estimates according to the time variable duration showed as follows; 25 percentile of the recovery of renal pelvis dilatation occurred after the 5 months from birth, 50% percentile after 10.5 months from birth, and 75 percentile after 15.1 month from birth. No significant differences in the rate of recovery using log rank test were identified among three groups (mild, moderate and severe).

  • Fig. 4 Diagnostic accuracy of AP diameter for the diagnosis of severe pelvic dilatation. Area under the curve (AUC) values were obtained from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.


Reference

1. Nguyen HT, Benson CB, Bromley B, Campbell JB, Chow J, Coleman B, et al. Multidisciplinary consensus on the classification of prenatal and postnatal urinary tract dilation (UTD classification system). J Pediatr Urol. 2014; 10:982–998.
Article
2. Mami C, Paolata A, Palmara A, Marrone T, Berte LF, Marseglia L, et al. Outcome and management of isolated moderate renal pelvis dilatation detected at postnatal screening. Pediatr Nephrol. 2009; 24:2005–2008.
Article
3. Scott JE, Wright B, Wilson G, Pearson IA, Matthews JN, Rose PG. Measuring the fetal kidney with ultrasonography. Br J Urol. 1995; 76:769–774.
Article
4. Gunn TR, Mora JD, Pease P. Antenatal diagnosis of urinary tract abnormalities by ultrasonography after 28 weeks' gestation: incidence and outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 172:479–486.
Article
5. Herndon CD. Antenatal hydronephrosis: differential diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment options. ScientificWorldJournal. 2006; 6:2345–2365.
Article
6. Nguyen HT, Herndon CD, Cooper C, Gatti J, Kirsch A, Kokorowski P, et al. The Society for Fetal Urology consensus statement on the evaluation and management of antenatal hydronephrosis. J Pediatr Urol. 2010; 6:212–231.
Article
7. Duncan KA. Antenatal renal pelvic dilatation; the long-term outlook. Clin Radiol. 2007; 62:134–139.
Article
8. Hothi DK, Wade AS, Gilbert R, Winyard PJ. Mild fetal renal pelvis dilatation: much ado about nothing? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009; 4:168–177.
9. Grignon A, Filion R, Filiatrault D, Robitaille P, Homsy Y, Boutin H, et al. Urinary tract dilatation in utero: classification and clinical applications. Radiology. 1986; 160:645–647.
Article
10. Ismaili K, Hall M, Donner C, Thomas D, Vermeylen D, Avni FE, et al. Results of systematic screening for minor degrees of fetal renal pelvis dilatation in an unselected population. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 188:242–246.
Article
11. Cheng AM, Phan V, Geary DF, Rosenblum ND. Outcome of isolated antenatal hydronephrosis. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004; 158:38–40.
Article
12. Bouzada MC, Oliveira EA, Pereira AK, Leite HV, Rodrigues AM, Fagundes LA, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fetal renal pelvis anteroposterior diameter as a predictor of uropathy: a prospective study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 24:745–749.
Article
13. Masson P, De Luca G, Tapia N, Le Pommelet C, Es Sathi A, Touati K, et al. Postnatal investigation and outcome of isolated fetal renal pelvis dilatation. Arch Pediatr. 2009; 16:1103–1110.
14. Onen A, Jayanthi VR, Koff SA. Long-term followup of prenatally detected severe bilateral newborn hydronephrosis initially managed nonoperatively. J Urol. 2002; 168:1118–1120.
Article
15. Karnak I, Woo LL, Shah SN, Sirajuddin A, Ross JH. Results of a practical protocol for management of prenatally detected hydronephrosis due to ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Pediatr Surg Int. 2009; 25:61–67.
Article
16. Bajpai M, Chandrasekharam VV. Nonoperative management of neonatal moderate to severe bilateral hydronephrosis. J Urol. 2002; 167:662–665.
Article
17. Park YJ, Mun SJ, Bae CW, Lee BH, Kim JI. Post-natal outcome of fetal hydronephrosis detected with prenatal ultrasonography. J Korean Pediatr Soc. 2002; 45:1213–1218.
18. Chen SY, Su YT, Wu CY. Nonobstructive dilation of urinary tract and later development of obstruction: report of one case. Pediatr Neonatol. 2010; 51:353–355.
Article
19. Odibo AO, Marchiano D, Quinones JN, Riesch D, Egan JF, Macones GA. Mild pyelectasis: evaluating the relationship between gestational age and renal pelvic anterior-posterior diameter. Prenat Diagn. 2003; 23:824–827.
Article
20. Policiano C, Djokovic D, Carvalho R, Monteiro C, Melo MA, Graça LM. Ultrasound antenatal detection of urinary tract anomalies in the last decade: outcome and prognosis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015; 28:959–963.
Article
21. Chitty LS, Altman DG. Charts of fetal size: kidney and renal pelvis measurements. Prenat Diagn. 2003; 23:891–897.
Article
22. Riccabona M. Assessment and management of newborn hydronephrosis. World J Urol. 2004; 22:73–78.
Article
23. Arena S, Magno C, Montalto AS, Russo T, Mami C, Baldari S, et al. Long-term follow-up of neonatally diagnosed primary megaureter: rate and predictors of spontaneous resolution. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2012; 46:201–207.
Article
24. Ismaili K, Avni FE, Wissing KM, Hall M. Brussels Free University Perinatal Nephrology Study. Group Long-term clinical outcome of infants with mild and moderate fetal pyelectasis: validation of neonatal ultrasound as a screening tool to detect significant nephrouropathies. J Pediatr. 2004; 144:759–765.
25. Dremsek PA, Gindl K, Voitl P, Strobl R, Hafner E, Geissler W, et al. Renal pyelectasis in fetuses and neonates: diagnostic value of renal pelvis diameter in pre- and postnatal sonographic screening. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997; 168:1017–1019.
Article
Full Text Links
  • PN
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr