Clin Exp Vaccine Res.  2017 Jan;6(1):38-44. 10.7774/cevr.2017.6.1.38.

Comparison of immunogenicity and safety of an influenza vaccine administered concomitantly with a 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine or 23-valent polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine in the elderly

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea.
  • 2Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. heejinmd@korea.ac.kr
  • 3Asian Pacific Influenza Institute (APII), Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
Previous studies have demonstrated the immunogenicity and safety of the co-administration of the trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV3) with the polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine (PPV) or pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV). However, there is no direct comparison study that evaluates the immunogenicity and safety of IIV3 given concomitantly with PCV13 or PPV23 in the elderly.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
During the 2012-2013 influenza vaccination period, 224 healthy elderly volunteers aged 65 years and older randomly received IIV3 given concomitantly with either PCV13 (PCV13+IIV3) or PPV23 (PPV23+IIV3) in a 1:1 ratio. Serum hemagglutination-inhibiting antibodies for IIV3 were measured at the time of vaccination and 1 month after vaccination. Adverse events were recorded prospectively in a clinical diary during a 7-day period.
RESULTS
A total of 220 participants blood samples for analysis of immunogenicity and kept a clinical diary for safety analysis (PCV13+IIV3, n=110; PPV23+IIV3, n=110). One month after vaccination, both groups satisfied the Committee for Medical Products for Human Use criteria for A/H1N1, A/H3N2 and B strains, showing comparable seroprotection rates, seroconversion rates and geometric mean titer fold. The assessments of immunogenicity were similar in both groups. The most common local and systemic reactions were pain at the injection site and generalized myalgia. They were generally mild or moderate in intensity. The adverse events were not statistically different between the two groups.
CONCLUSION
PCV13+IIV3 and PPV23+IIV3 demonstrated similar immunogenicity and safety in the elderly.

Keyword

Pneumococcus; Influenza; Vaccine; Immunogenicity; Safety

MeSH Terms

Aged*
Antibodies
Humans
Influenza Vaccines*
Influenza, Human*
Myalgia
Prospective Studies
Seroconversion
Streptococcus pneumoniae
Vaccination
Volunteers
Antibodies
Influenza Vaccines

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Changes of geometric mean titer (GMT), seroprotection rate, seroconversion rate, and GMT fold after vaccination. Serum samples collected from elderly volunteers vaccinated with trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV3) simultaneously with either 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) or 23-valent polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine (PPV23) before vaccination and 1 month after vaccination were tested by hemagglutination inhibition assay. The GMT (A), the seroprotection rate (proportion of subjects with a post-vaccination titer ≥1:40) (B), seroconversion rate (proportion of subjects with ≥4-fold increase in titer from pre-vaccination titer or a post-vaccination ≥1:40 if the pre-vaccination titer was <1:40) (C), and GMT fold (GMT ratio of the post-vaccination titer to pre-vaccination titer) (D) were measured. The dotted lines indicate the criteria of the Committee for Medical Products for Human Use (CHMP). *Significantly different between two groups.


Reference

1. Walter ND, Taylor TH, Shay DK, et al. Influenza circulation and the burden of invasive pneumococcal pneumonia during a non-pandemic period in the United States. Clin Infect Dis. 2010; 50:175–183.
Article
2. Grabowska K, Hogberg L, Penttinen P, Svensson A, Ekdahl K. Occurrence of invasive pneumococcal disease and number of excess cases due to influenza. BMC Infect Dis. 2006; 6:58.
Article
3. Mangtani P, Cumberland P, Hodgson CR, Roberts JA, Cutts FT, Hall AJ. A cohort study of the effectiveness of influenza vaccine in older people, performed using the United Kingdom general practice research database. J Infect Dis. 2004; 190:1–10.
Article
4. Nichol KL, Nordin JD, Nelson DB, Mullooly JP, Hak E. Effectiveness of influenza vaccine in the community-dwelling elderly. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357:1373–1381.
Article
5. Mooney JD, Weir A, McMenamin J, et al. The impact and effectiveness of pneumococcal vaccination in Scotland for those aged 65 and over during winter 2003/2004. BMC Infect Dis. 2008; 8:53.
Article
6. Vila-Corcoles A, Ochoa-Gondar O, Guzman JA, et al. Effectiveness of the 23-valent polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine against invasive pneumococcal disease in people 60 years or older. BMC Infect Dis. 2010; 10:73.
Article
7. Nichol KL. The additive benefits of influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations during influenza seasons among elderly persons with chronic lung disease. Vaccine. 1999; 17:Suppl 1. S91–S93.
Article
8. Furumoto A, Ohkusa Y, Chen M, et al. Additive effect of pneumococcal vaccine and influenza vaccine on acute exacerbation in patients with chronic lung disease. Vaccine. 2008; 26:4284–4289.
Article
9. Christenson B, Hedlund J, Lundbergh P, Ortqvist A. Additive preventive effect of influenza and pneumococcal vaccines in elderly persons. Eur Respir J. 2004; 23:363–368.
Article
10. Fedson DS, Nicolas-Spony L, Klemets P, et al. Pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccination for adults: new perspectives for Europe. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2011; 10:1143–1167.
Article
11. Song JY, Cheong HJ, Heo JY, et al. Outpatient-based pneumococcal vaccine campaign and survey of perceptions about pneumococcal vaccination in patients and doctors. Yonsei Med J. 2013; 54:469–475.
Article
12. Honkanen PO, Keistinen T, Kivela SL. Reactions following administration of influenza vaccine alone or with pneumococcal vaccine to the elderly. Arch Intern Med. 1996; 156:205–208.
Article
13. Schwarz TF, Flamaing J, Rumke HC, et al. A randomized, double-blind trial to evaluate immunogenicity and safety of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine given concomitantly with trivalent influenza vaccine in adults aged ≥ 65 years. Vaccine. 2011; 29:5195–5202.
Article
14. Hannoun C, Megas F, Piercy J. Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of influenza vaccination. Virus Res. 2004; 103:133–138.
Article
15. Song JY, Cheong HJ, Woo HJ, et al. Immunogenicity and safety of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine: a randomized, double-blind, multi-center, phase 3 clinical trial in a vaccine-limited country. J Korean Med Sci. 2011; 26:191–195.
Article
16. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. Guidance for industry toxicity grading scale for healthy adult and adolescent volunteers enrolled in preventive vaccine clinical trials. Rockville: U.S: Department of Health and Human Services;2007.
17. Fletcher TJ, Tunnicliffe WS, Hammond K, Roberts K, Ayres JG. Simultaneous immunisation with influenza vaccine and pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine in patients with chronic respiratory disease. BMJ. 1997; 314:1663–1665.
Article
18. Frenck RW Jr, Gurtman A, Rubino J, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of a 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine administered concomitantly with an influenza vaccine in healthy adults. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2012; 19:1296–1303.
Article
19. Song JY, Cheong HJ, Tsai TF, et al. Immunogenicity and safety of concomitant MF59-adjuvanted influenza vaccine and 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine administration in older adults. Vaccine. 2015; 33:4647–4652.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CEVR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr