Korean J Pain.  2016 Apr;29(2):136-140. 10.3344/kjp.2016.29.2.136.

Effects of Intramuscular Electrical Stimulation Using Inversely Placed Electrodes on Myofascial Pain Syndrome in the Shoulder: A Case Series

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Neuro-Physiotherapy, Nitte Institute of Physiotherapy, Karnataka, India. suku729@gmail.com
  • 2Department of Orthopaedics, K. S. Hegde Medical Academy, Karnataka, India.
  • 3Department of Orthopaedic-Physiotherapy, Nitte Institute of Physiotherapy, Karnataka, India.

Abstract

Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is one of the common musculoskeletal conditions of the shoulder which may develop sensory-motor and autonomic dysfunctions at the various level of the neuromuscular system. The pain and dysfunction caused by MPS were primarily treated with physical therapy and pharmacological agents in order to achieve painfree movements. However, in recent years intramuscular electrical stimulation (IMES) with conventional electrode placement was used by researchers to maximise therapeutic values. But, in this study an inverse electrode placement was used to deliver electrical impulses intramuscularly to achieve neuro-modulation at the various level of the nervous system. Nine patients with MPS were treated with intramuscular electrode stimulation using inversely placed electrodes for a period of three weeks. All nine subjects recovered from their shoulder pain and disability within the few weeks of intervention. So, this inverse electrode placement may be more appropriate for chronic pain management.

Keyword

Dry needling; Inverse electrode placements; Intramuscular electrical stimulation; Myofascial pain syndrome; Myofascial trigger points; Surface electrical stimulation

MeSH Terms

Chronic Pain
Electric Stimulation*
Electrodes*
Humans
Myofascial Pain Syndromes*
Nervous System
Shoulder Pain
Shoulder*

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Superior view of dry needle electrodes insertion over 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th & 7th cervical levels.


Cited by  2 articles

Optimal Cut-Off Value of the Coracohumeral Ligament Area as a Morphological Parameter to Confirm Frozen Shoulder
Hyung Rae Cho, Byong Hyon Cho, Keum Nae Kang, Young Uk Kim
J Korean Med Sci. 2020;35(15):e99.    doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e99.

Inverse Electrode Placement May Help to Improve Electrotherapeutic Effects in the Field of Chronic Pain Management
Sukumar Shanmugam
Korean J Pain. 2016;29(3):202-204.    doi: 10.3344/kjp.2016.29.3.202.


Reference

1. Simons DG, Travell JG, Simons LS. Myofascial pain and dysfunction: the trigger point manual. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins;1999.
2. Bron C, Dommerholt J, Stegenga B, Wensing M, Oostendorp RA. High prevalence of shoulder girdle muscles with myofascial trigger points in patients with shoulder pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011; 12:139. PMID: 21711512.
Article
3. Gerwin RD. Classification, epidemiology, and natural history of myofascial pain syndrome. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2001; 5:412–420. PMID: 11560806.
Article
4. Fernández-de-las-Peñas C, Dommerholt J. Myofascial trigger points: peripheral or central phenomenon? Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2014; 16:395. PMID: 24264721.
Article
5. Dommerholt J, del Moral OM, Grobli C. Trigger point dry needling. J Man Manip Ther. 2006; 14:E70–E87.
Article
6. Chu J, Schwartz I. Etoims twitch relief method in chronic refractory myofascial pain (CRMP). Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 2008; 48:311–320. PMID: 18837197.
7. Gondin J, Cozzone PJ, Bendahan D. Is high-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation a suitable tool for muscle performance improvement in both healthy humans and athletes? Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011; 111:2473–2487. PMID: 21909714.
Article
8. Szecsi J, Fornusek C, Krause P, Straube A. Low-frequency rectangular pulse is superior to middle frequency alternating current stimulation in cycling of people with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007; 88:338–345. PMID: 17321827.
Article
9. Lee SH, Chen CC, Lee CS, Lin TC, Chan RC. Effects of needle electrical intramuscular stimulation on shoulder and cervical myofascial pain syndrome and microcirculation. J Chin Med Assoc. 2008; 71:200–206. PMID: 18436503.
Article
10. Rainey CE. The use of trigger point dry needling and intramuscular electrical stimulation for a subject with chronic low back pain: a case report. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2013; 8:145–161. PMID: 23593553.
11. Lucas KR, Polus BI, Rich PA. Latent myofascial trigger points: their effects on muscle activation and movement efficiency. J Bodywork Movement Ther. 2004; 8:160–166.
Article
12. Shah JP, Danoff JV, Desai MJ, Parikh S, Nakamura LY, Phillips TM, et al. Biochemicals associated with pain and inflammation are elevated in sites near to and remote from active myofascial trigger points. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008; 89:16–23. PMID: 18164325.
Article
13. Ga H, Choi JH, Park CH, Yoon HJ. Dry needling of trigger points with and without paraspinal needling in myofascial pain syndromes in elderly patients. J Altern Complement Med. 2007; 13:617–624. PMID: 17718644.
Article
14. Shanmugam S, Shetty K, Mathias L. Dry needling effects on non-specific cervical radiculopathic pain and dysfunction: a case report. Int J Ther Rehabil Res. 2015; 4:21–25.
Article
15. Rock JM, Rainey CE. Treatment of nonspecific thoracic spine pain with trigger point dry needling and intramuscular electrical stimulation: a case series. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014; 9:699–711. PMID: 25328832.
Full Text Links
  • KJP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr