Korean J Ophthalmol.  2016 Feb;30(1):40-47. 10.3341/kjo.2016.30.1.40.

Comparison of the Progression of High- and Low-tension Glaucoma as Determined by Two Different Criteria

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. sungeye@gmail.com

Abstract

PURPOSE
To investigate and compare the progression of medically treated primary open angle glaucoma according to the baseline intraocular pressure (IOP).
METHODS
This study included a total of 345 eyes from 345 patients (mean follow-up period, 4.5 years). Eyes were classified into either conventional normal tension glaucoma (cNTG, < or =21 mmHg) or conventional high-tension glaucoma (cHTG, >21 mmHg) groups according to the conventional cut-off value of the IOP. Additionally, the median IOP (15 mmHg) was used to create two other groups (median NTG [mNTG] < or =15 mmHg and median HTG [mHTG] >15 mmHg). Using these values, 306, 39, 153, and 192 eyes were assigned to the cNTG, cHTG, mNTG, and mHTG groups, respectively. Glaucoma progression was determined either by optic disc/retinal nerve fiber layer photographs or serial visual field data.
RESULTS
Mean reduction of IOP after medical treatment and of central corneal thickness was lower in the cNTG group, while the prevalence of disc hemorrhage and baseline visual field mean deviation did not differ between the cNTG and cHTG groups. A mean reduction in the IOP was observed after medical treatment, and central corneal thickness was lower in the mNTG group; disc hemorrhage was more frequent in the mNTG than in the mHTG group. Among the 345 analyzed eyes, 100 (29%) showed progression during the follow-up period. In the cHTG group, a higher baseline IOP (hazard ratio, 1.147; p = 0.024) was associated with glaucoma progression. Disc hemorrhage (hazard ratio, 15.533; p < 0.001) was also strongly associated with progression in the mNTG group.
CONCLUSIONS
Baseline IOP was a significant risk factor for glaucoma progression in cHTG patients (10% of our total participants), while disc hemorrhage showed the strongest association with progression in the mNTG group, indicating that a cut-off value other than the conventional 21 mmHg is required to define true low-tension glaucoma in populations where NTG predominates among all glaucoma patients.

Keyword

Classification; Disease progression; Glaucoma; Intraocular pressure; Optic disc hemorrhage

MeSH Terms

Aged
Disease Progression
Female
Glaucoma, Open-Angle/*diagnosis
Gonioscopy
Humans
Intraocular Pressure
Low Tension Glaucoma/*diagnosis
Male
Middle Aged
Nerve Fibers/pathology
Optic Disk/pathology
Optic Nerve Diseases/*diagnosis
Photography/standards
Retinal Ganglion Cells/pathology
Retrospective Studies
Tomography, Optical Coherence
Tonometry, Ocular
Vision Disorders/diagnosis
Visual Field Tests/standards
Visual Fields

Reference

1. Comparison of glaucomatous progression between untreated patients with normal-tension glaucoma and patients with therapeutically reduced intraocular pressures: Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998; 126:487–497.
2. Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, et al. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002; 120:1268–1279.
3. The effectiveness of intraocular pressure reduction in the treatment of normal-tension glaucoma: Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998; 126:498–505.
4. Sung KR, Lee S, Park SB, et al. Twenty-four hour ocular perfusion pressure fluctuation and risk of normal-tension glaucoma progression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009; 50:5266–5274.
5. Sung KR, Cho JW, Lee S, et al. Characteristics of visual field progression in medically treated normal-tension glaucoma patients with unstable ocular perfusion pressure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52:737–743.
6. Allingham RR. Shields textbook of glaucoma. In : Allingham RR, editor. Intraocular pressure and tonometry. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;2011. p. 24.
7. Heijl A, Bengtsson B, Hyman L, et al. Natural history of open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2009; 116:2271–2276.
8. Kim CS, Seong GJ, Lee NH, et al. Prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in central South Korea the Namil study. Ophthalmology. 2011; 118:1024–1030.
9. Iwase A, Suzuki Y, Araie M, et al. The prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in Japanese: the Tajimi Study. Ophthalmology. 2004; 111:1641–1648.
10. Klein BE, Klein R, Linton KL. Intraocular pressure in an American community: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992; 33:2224–2228.
11. Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, et al. Measuring visual field progression in the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2003; 81:286–293.
12. Sung KR, Sun JH, Na JH, et al. Progression detection capability of macular thickness in advanced glaucomatous eyes. Ophthalmology. 2012; 119:308–313.
13. Sung KR, Kim DY, Park SB, Kook MS. Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by Cirrus HD and Stratus optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2009; 116:1264–1270.
14. Na JH, Sung KR, Lee JR, et al. Detection of glaucomatous progression by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2013; 120:1388–1395.
15. Lee J, Kong M, Kim J, Kee C. Comparison of visual field progression between relatively low and high intraocular pressure groups in normal tension glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma. 2014; 23:553–560.
16. Park HY, Jeon SH, Park CK. Enhanced depth imaging detects lamina cribrosa thickness differences in normal tension glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2012; 119:10–20.
17. Kim S, Sung KR, Lee JR, Lee KS. Evaluation of lamina cribrosa in pseudoexfoliation syndrome using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography enhanced depth imaging. Ophthalmology. 2013; 120:1798–1803.
18. Chen BH, Drucker MD, Louis KM, Richards DW. Progression of normal-tension glaucoma after ventriculoperitoneal shunt to decrease cerebrospinal fluid pressure. J Glaucoma. 2014; 10. 27. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000186.
Full Text Links
  • KJO
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr