Ann Lab Med.  2015 Jan;35(1):76-81. 10.3343/alm.2015.35.1.76.

Evaluation of the iNtRON VRE vanA/vanB Real-Time PCR Assay for Detection of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. changski@skku.edu
  • 2Department of Laboratory Medicine, Gachon University Gil Hospital, Incheon, Korea.
  • 3Center for Clinical Medicine, Samsung Biomedical Research Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Recently, the iNtRON VRE vanA/vanB real-time PCR (iNtRON; iNtRON Biotechnology, Korea) assay, a multiplex real-time PCR method, was introduced. In this prospective study, we compared the iNtRON assay with the Seeplex VRE ACE detection kit (Seeplex; Seegene, Korea), a conventional multiplex PCR assay.
METHODS
A chromogenic agar-based culture, in which pre-selected vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) was grown and subsequently plated on blood agar with vancomycin disks, was regarded as the reference method. A total of 304 consecutive rectal swab specimens were tested for VRE by culture and by iNtRON and Seeplex PCR assays. For the PCR assays, specimens were enriched for 16-24 hr before PCR.
RESULTS
VRE were isolated from 44 (14.5%) specimens by chromogenic agar-based culture. The clinical sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the iNtRON assay were 100% (95% confidence interval: 89.8%-100%), 99.2% (96.9%-99.9%), 95.6% (83.6%-99.2%), and 100% (98.2%-100%), respectively, while those of the Seeplex assay were 97.7% (86.2%-99.9%), 99.6% (97.5%-99.9%), 97.7% (86.2%-99.9%), and 99.6% (97.5%-99.9%), respectively. The iNtRON assay had a detection limit of 3,159 copies/microL and 13,702 copies/microL for the vanA and vanB genes, respectively. No cross-reactivity was observed in 11 non-VRE bacterial culture isolates.
CONCLUSIONS
The overall performance of the iNtRON assay was comparable to that of a chromogenic agar-based culture method for prompt identification of VRE-colonized patients in hospitals. This assay could be an alternative or supportive method for the effective control of nosocomial VRE infection.

Keyword

Real-time PCR; Performance; vanA; vanB; Vancomycin-resistant enterococci

MeSH Terms

Bacterial Proteins/*genetics
Bacterial Typing Techniques/*methods/standards
Carbon-Oxygen Ligases/*genetics
DNA, Bacterial/*metabolism
Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/microbiology
Humans
Reagent Kits, Diagnostic
*Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
Vancomycin Resistance/genetics
Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci/*genetics/isolation & purification
Bacterial Proteins
Carbon-Oxygen Ligases
DNA, Bacterial
Reagent Kits, Diagnostic

Reference

1. Babady NE, Gilhuley K, Cianciminio-Bordelon D, Tang YW. Performance characteristics of the Cepheid Xpert vanA assay for rapid identification of patients at high risk for carriage of vancomycin-resistant Enterococci. J Clin Microbiol. 2012; 50:3659–3663. PMID: 22972822.
2. Courvalin P. Vancomycin resistance in gram-positive cocci. Clin Infect Dis. 2006; 42(S1):S25–S34. PMID: 16323116.
Article
3. Bell JM, Paton JC, Turnidge J. Emergence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in Australia: phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 1998; 36:2187–2190. PMID: 9665988.
Article
4. Mak A, Miller MA, Chong G, Monczak Y. Comparison of PCR and culture for screening of vancomycin-resistant Enterococci: highly disparate results for vanA and vanB. J Clin Microbiol. 2009; 47:4136–4137. PMID: 19846635.
5. Park IJ, Lee WG, Lee H, Yong D, Lee K, Kim EC, et al. Mechanism of vanB phenotype in vancomycin-resistant Enterococci carrying vanA gene. Korean J Lab Med. 2006; 26:412–417. PMID: 18156760.
Article
6. DiazGranados CA, Zimmer SM, Klein M, Jernigan JA. Comparison of mortality associated with vancomycin-resistant and vancomycin-susceptible enterococcal bloodstream infections: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2005; 41:327–333. PMID: 16007529.
Article
7. Salgado CD, Farr BM. Outcomes associated with vancomycin-resistant enterococci: a meta-analysis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2003; 24:690–698. PMID: 14510253.
Article
8. Bonten MJ, Slaughter S, Ambergen AW, Hayden MK, van Voorhis J, Nathan C, et al. The role of "colonization pressure" in the spread of vancomycin-resistant enterococci: an important infection control variable. Arch Intern Med. 1998; 158:1127–1132. PMID: 9605785.
9. Perl TM. The threat of vancomycin resistance. Am J Med. 1999; 106:26S–37S. discussion 48S-52S. PMID: 10348061.
Article
10. Roger M, Faucher MC, Forest P, St-Antoine P, Coutlée F. Evaluation of a vanA-specific PCR assay for detection of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium during a hospital outbreak. J Clin Microbiol. 1999; 37:3348–3349. PMID: 10488203.
11. Seo JY, Kim PW, Lee JH, Song JH, Peck KR, Chung DR, et al. Evaluation of PCR-based screening for vancomycin-resistant enterococci compared with a chromogenic agar-based culture method. J Med Microbiol. 2011; 60:945–949. PMID: 21459908.
Article
12. Bae MH, Kim J, Sung H, Jeong YS, Kim MN. Evaluation of iNtRON VRE vanA/vanB real-time PCR for follow-up surveillance of VRE-infected or colonized patients. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013; 77:292–295. PMID: 24094836.
13. Steingart KR, Sohn H, Schiller I, Kloda LA, Boehme CC, Pai M, et al. Xpert® MTB/RIF assay for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 1:CD009593. PMID: 23440842.
Article
14. Cekin Y, Erman Daloğlu A, Oğünç D, Ozhak Baysan B, Dağlar D, Inan D, et al. Evaluation of vancomycin resistance 3 multiplexed PCR assay for detection of vancomycin-resistant enterococci from rectal swabs. Ann Lab Med. 2013; 33:326–330. PMID: 24003422.
Article
15. Kim TS, Kwon HL, Song SH, Song KH, Kim HB, Park KU, et al. Real-time PCR surveillance of vanA for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. Mol Med Rep. 2012; 6:488–492. PMID: 22710424.
Article
16. Werner G, Serr A, Schütt S, Schneider C, Klare I, Witte W, et al. Comparison of direct cultivation on a selective solid medium, polymerase chain reaction from an enrichment broth, and the BD GeneOhm™ VanR Assay for identification of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in screening specimens. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011; 70:512–521. PMID: 21767707.
Article
17. Stamper PD, Cai M, Lema C, Eskey K, Carroll KC. Comparison of the BD GeneOhm VanR assay to culture for identification of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in rectal and stool specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2007; 45:3360–3365. PMID: 17704282.
Article
18. Lleò MM, Bonato B, Tafi MC, Signoretto C, Boaretti M, Canepari P. Resuscitation rate in different enterococcal species in the viable but non-culturable state. J Appl Microbiol. 2001; 91:1095–1102. PMID: 11851818.
Article
19. Lleò MM, Bonato B, Signoretto C, Canepari P. Vancomycin resistance is maintained in enterococci in the viable but nonculturable state and after division is resumed. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003; 47:1154–1156. PMID: 12604561.
Article
20. D'Agata EM, Gautam S, Green WK, Tang YW. High rate of false-negative results of the rectal swab culture method in detection of gastrointestinal colonization with vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Clin Infect Dis. 2002; 34:167–172. PMID: 11740703.
21. Patel R. Enterococcal-type glycopeptide resistance genes in non-enterococcal organisms. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2000; 185:1–7. PMID: 10731599.
Article
22. Fontana R, Ligozzi M, Pedrotti C, Padovani EM, Cornaglia G. Vancomycin-resistant Bacillus circulans carrying the vanA gene responsible for vancomycin resistance in enterococci. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1997; 16:473–474. PMID: 9248754.
23. Sievert DM, Rudrik JT, Patel JB, McDonald LC, Wilkins MJ, Hageman JC. Vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the United States, 2002-2006. Clin Infect Dis. 2008; 46:668–674. PMID: 18257700.
Article
24. Power EG, Abdulla YH, Talsania HG, Spice W, Aathithan S, French GL. vanA genes in vancomycin-resistant clinical isolates of Oerskovia turbata and Arcanobacterium (Corynebacterium) haemolyticum. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995; 36:595–606. PMID: 8591934.
25. Ligozzi M, Lo Cascio G, Fontana R. vanA gene cluster in a vancomycin-resistant clinical isolate of Bacillus circulans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998; 42:2055–2059. PMID: 9687406.
26. Lee WG, Jernigan JA, Rasheed JK, Anderson GJ, Tenover FC. Possible horizontal transfer of the vanB2 gene among genetically diverse strains of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in a Korean hospital. J Clin Microbiol. 2001; 39:1165–1168. PMID: 11230450.
27. Ko KS, Baek JY, Lee JY, Oh WS, Peck KR, Lee N, et al. Molecular characterization of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium isolates from Korea. J Clin Microbiol. 2005; 43:2303–2306. PMID: 15872259.
28. Won D, Hong KH, Yun K, Sung H, Kim MN. Occurrence of a PCR-positive but culture-negative case forvanB vancomycin-resistant Enterococci in stool surveillance. Lab Med Online. 2013; 3:264–268.
29. Seol CA, Park JS, Sung H, Kim MN. Co-colonization of vanA and vanB Enterococcus faecium of clonal complex 17 in a patient with bacteremia due to vanA E. faecium. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014; 79:141–143. PMID: 24674093.
Article
Full Text Links
  • ALM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr