Healthc Inform Res.  2016 Oct;22(4):333-341. 10.4258/hir.2016.22.4.333.

Acceptability of Service Targets for ICT-Based Healthcare

Affiliations
  • 1Medical Informatics and Health Technology (MIT), Department of Healthcare Management, College of Social Science, Gachon University, Seongnam, Korea. hjseo@gachon.ac.kr

Abstract


OBJECTIVES
In order to adopt and activate telemedicine it is necessary to survey how medical staff, who are providers of medical service, and consumers, who are the service targets, perceive information and communication technology (ICT)-based healthcare service.
METHODS
This study surveyed the awareness and acceptability of ICT-based healthcare by involving service targets, specifically workers and students living in the Seoul and Gyeonggi regions who are consumers of healthcare service. To determine the correlation among awareness of ICT-based healthcare, the need for self-management, and acceptability, this study conducted a correlation analysis and a simple regression analysis.
RESULTS
According to the responses to the questions on the need for ICT-based healthcare service by item, blood pressure (n = 279, 94.3%) and glucose (n = 277, 93.6%) were revealed to be the physiological signal monitoring area. Among the six measurement factors affecting ICT-based healthcare service acceptability, age, health concerns, and effect expectation had the most significant effects. As effect expectation increased, acceptability became 4.38 times higher (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
This study identified a positive awareness of service targets on ICT-based healthcare service. The fact that acceptability is higher among people who have family disease history or greater health concerns may lead to service targets' more active participation. This study also confirmed that a policy to motivate active participation of those in their 40s (who had high prevalence rates) was needed.

Keyword

Telemedicine; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Surveys and Questionnaires; Patient Care Management; Self Care

MeSH Terms

Blood Pressure
Delivery of Health Care*
Glucose
Gyeonggi-do
Humans
Medical Staff
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
Patient Care Management
Prevalence
Self Care
Seoul
Surveys and Questionnaires
Telemedicine
Glucose

Reference

1. Korea Health Industry Development Institute. Weekly healthcare industry trend report. Seoul: Korea Health Industry Development Institute;2015. p. 159.
2. National Information Society Agency. IT & future strategy report. Seoul: National Information Society Agency;2015.
3. Korea Health Industry Development Institute. Digital healthcare platform and business trends. Seoul: Korea Health Industry Development Institute;2014.
4. Fenn J, Raskino M. Gartner’s hype cycle special report for 2013. . Stamford (CT): Gartner Inc.;2013.
5. Bradley J, Barbier J, Handler D. Embracing the Internet of everything to capture your share of $14.4 trillion. San Jose (CA): Cisco Systems Inc.;2013.
6. Bughin J, Manyika J, Woetzel J, Chui M, Bisson P, Dobbs R. The Internet of Things: mapping the value beyond the hype. Washington (DC): McKinsey Global Institute;2015.
7. Lee NY, Yoo HS, Lee SH, Kwon OB. U-healthcare service for psychological wellbeing lifecare. Korean J Bus Adm. 2012; 25(8):3397–3415.
8. Kim JK, Kim JH, Park DK, Lee YH. U-health platform based health management service model using context information. J Digit Converg. 2012; 10(8):185–192.
9. Lee HM. A study on the acceptance of wearable computers based on the extended technology acceptance model. Res J Costume Cult. 2009; 17(6):1155–1172.
Article
10. Yun JL. Introduction of creative ICT R&D trends. J Korean Inst Inf Sci Eng. 2015; 33(1):4–5.
11. RBC Capital Markets. The RBC Capital Markets Consumer Health & Information Technology Survey: the 'wearable' issue [Internet]. New York (NY): RBC Capital Markets;2015. cited at 2016 Oct 24. Available from: https://healthmanagementacademyin-public.sharepoint.com/attachmentsexternal/publications/The_RBC_Capital_Markets_Consumer_Health_Information_Technology_Survey2015-07-13.pdf.
12. TechRepublic. IBM Watson Health computes a pair of new solutions to improve healthcare data and security [Internet]. [place unknown]: TechRepublic;2015. cited at 2016 Oct 24. Available from: http://www.techrepublic.com/article/ibm-watson-health-computes-a-pair-of-new-solutions-to-improve-healthcare-data-and-security/.
13. Cho HS, Koh DY. U-health service customer awareness and development. Sejong: Korea Institute for Industrial Economics & Trade;2011.
14. Varkey P, Schumacher K, Swanton C, Timm B, Hagen PT. Telemedicine in the work site: a study of feasibility, and patient and provider satisfaction. J Telemed Telecare. 2008; 14(6):322–325.
Article
15. Whitten P, Doolittle G, Mackert M. Providers' acceptance of telehospice. J Palliat Med. 2005; 8(4):730–735.
Article
16. Noh MJ, Park SC, Youn KI. The effects of consumer characteristics on the intention to use u-healthcare services. Korean J Hosp Manag. 2010; 15(4):27–42.
17. Jeong YG. Improvement on telemedicine regulations. Mag IEEK. 2016; 43(2):50–58.
18. Lee Y, Moon M. Utilization and content evaluation of mobile applications for pregnancy, birth, and child care. Healthc Inform Res. 2016; 22(2):73–80.
Article
19. Choi H, Kim J. Low-income elders’ experiences in using u-health (ubiquitous healthcare) services. J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs. 2014; 25(4):270–281.
Article
20. Lee YK, Park JY, Rho MJ, Wang BR, Choi IY. Doctors' perception and intention of the u-healthcare service. J Korea Contents Assoc. 2012; 12(2):349–357.
Article
21. Kim H, Jo J, Choi Y, Oh J, Lee J, Yoon K. Ubiquitous health care system for chronic disease management. J Korean Inst Commun Sci. 2010; 27(9):3–8.
22. Choi EH, Seo JY. u-Health for management of chronic diseases: physical activity and therapeutic exercise. J Korean Med Assoc. 2009; 52(12):1154–1163.
Article
23. Ekeland AG, Bowes A, Flottorp S. Effectiveness of telemedicine: a systematic review of reviews. Int J Med Inform. 2010; 79(11):736–771.
Article
24. Song TM, Lee SY, Lee KS, Park DS, Jin DR. U-health: current status and tasks ahead. Seoul: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs;2011.
25. Statistics Korea. 2014 Causes of death statistics [Internet]. Daejeon: Statistics Korea;2015. cited at 2016 Oct 1. Available from: http://kostat.go.kr/portal/korea/kor_nw/3/index.board?bmode=read&aSeq=348541.
Full Text Links
  • HIR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr