Restor Dent Endod.  2016 Nov;41(4):341-342. 10.5395/rde.2016.41.4.341.

Relationship between laboratory bond strengths and clinical performance of dentin adhesives

Affiliations
  • 1Kyungpook National University, Korea.

Abstract

No abstract available.


MeSH Terms

Adhesives*
Dentin*
Adhesives

Cited by  1 articles

Publication patterns in Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
Sherin Jose Chockattu, Byathnal Suryakant Deepak
Restor Dent Endod. 2019;44(3):.    doi: 10.5395/rde.2019.44.e34.


Reference

1. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Mine A, Van Ende A, Neves A, De Munck J. Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. Dent Mater. 2010; 26:e100–e121.
Article
2. Christensen GJ. Bonding to dentin and enamel where does it stand in 2005? J Am Dent Assoc. 2005; 136:1299–1302.
3. Bouillaguet S, Troesch S, Wataha JC, Krejci I, Meyer JM, Pashley DH. Microtensile bond strength between adhesive cements and root canal dentin. Dent Mater. 2003; 19:199–205.
Article
4. Della Bona A, van Noort R. Shear vs. tensile bond strength of resin composite bonded to ceramic. J Dent Res. 1995; 74:1591–1596.
Article
5. Motulsky H. Intuitive biostatistics. 1st ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press;1995. Chapter 12.
6. Roulet JF. Statistics: nuisance - tool - necessity? J Adhes Dent. 2013; 15:203.
7. Sudsangiam S, van Noort R. Do dentin bond strength tests serve a useful purpose? J Adhes Dent. 1999; 1:57–67.
8. Heintze SD. Systematic reviews: I. The correlation between laboratory tests on marginal quality and bond strength. II. The correlation between marginal quality and clinical outcome. J Adhes Dent. 2007; 9:Supplement 1. 77–106.
Full Text Links
  • RDE
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr