J Breast Cancer.  2014 Mar;17(1):1-7.

Patterns and Biologic Features of p53 Mutation Types in Korean Breast Cancer Patients

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. gsjjoon@yuhs.ac
  • 2Department of Laboratory Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
The p53 gene is one of the most frequently mutated genes in breast cancer. We investigated the patterns and biologic features of p53 gene mutation and evaluated their clinical significance in Korean breast cancer patients.
METHODS
Patients who underwent p53 gene sequencing were included. Mutational analysis of exon 5 to exon 9 of the p53 gene was carried out using polymerase chain reaction-denaturing high performance liquid chromatography and direct sequencing.
RESULTS
A total of 497 patients were eligible for the present study and p53 gene mutations were detected in 71 cases (14.3%). Mutation of p53 was significantly associated with histologic grading (p<0.001), estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status (p<0.001), HER2 status (p<0.001), Ki-67 (p=0.028), and tumor size (p=0.004). The most frequent location of p53 mutations was exon 7 and missense mutation was the most common type of mutation. Compared with patients without mutation, there was a statistically significant difference in relapse-free survival of patients with p53 gene mutation and missense mutation (p=0.020, p=0.006, respectively). Only p53 missense mutation was an independent prognostic factor for relapse-free survival in multivariate analysis, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 2.29 (95% confidence interval, 1.08-4.89, p=0.031).
CONCLUSION
Mutation of the p53 gene was associated with more aggressive clinicopathologic characteristics and p53 missense mutation was an independent negative prognostic factor in Korean breast cancer patients.

Keyword

Breast neoplasms; Mutation; p53 Genes

MeSH Terms

Breast Neoplasms*
Breast*
Chromatography, Liquid
Estrogens
Exons
Genes, p53
Humans
Multivariate Analysis
Mutation, Missense
Receptors, Progesterone
Estrogens
Receptors, Progesterone

Figure

  • Figure 1 Types of p53 gene mutations in 71 patients.

  • Figure 2 Locations of p53 gene mutations in 71 patients.

  • Figure 3 Kaplan-Meier relapse-free survival curve according to p53 missense mutation.


Reference

1. Rakha EA, El-Sayed ME, Green AR, Lee AH, Robertson JF, Ellis IO. Prognostic markers in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer. 2007; 109:25–32.
Article
2. Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Thürlimann B, Senn HJ, et al. Strategies for subtypes: dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011. Ann Oncol. 2011; 22:1736–1747.
Article
3. Kaplan HG, Malmgren JA. Impact of triple negative phenotype on breast cancer prognosis. Breast J. 2008; 14:456–463.
Article
4. Grann VR, Troxel AB, Zojwalla NJ, Jacobson JS, Hershman D, Neugut AI. Hormone receptor status and survival in a population-based cohort of patients with breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2005; 103:2241–2251.
Article
5. Børresen-Dale AL. TP53 and breast cancer. Hum Mutat. 2003; 21:292–300.
6. Levine AJ, Momand J, Finlay CA. The p53 tumour suppressor gene. Nature. 1991; 351:453–456.
Article
7. Yonish-Rouach E, Resnitzky D, Lotem J, Sachs L, Kimchi A, Oren M. Wild-type p53 induces apoptosis of myeloid leukaemic cells that is inhibited by interleukin-6. Nature. 1991; 352:345–347.
Article
8. Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2012; 490:61–70.
9. Perou CM, Sørlie T, Eisen MB, van de Rijn M, Jeffrey SS, Rees CA, et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2000; 406:747–752.
Article
10. Sotiriou C, Neo SY, McShane LM, Korn EL, Long PM, Jazaeri A, et al. Breast cancer classification and prognosis based on gene expression profiles from a population-based study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100:10393–10398.
Article
11. Berns EM, van Staveren IL, Look MP, Smid M, Klijn JG, Foekens JA. Mutations in residues of TP53 that directly contact DNA predict poor outcome in human primary breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 1998; 77:1130–1136.
Article
12. Olivier M, Langerød A, Carrieri P, Bergh J, Klaar S, Eyfjord J, et al. The clinical value of somatic TP53 gene mutations in 1,794 patients with breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2006; 12:1157–1167.
Article
13. Pharoah PD, Day NE, Caldas C. Somatic mutations in the p53 gene and prognosis in breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer. 1999; 80:1968–1973.
Article
14. Végran F, Rebucci M, Chevrier S, Cadouot M, Boidot R, Lizard-Nacol S. Only missense mutations affecting the DNA binding domain of p53 influence outcomes in patients with breast carcinoma. PLoS One. 2013; 8:e55103.
Article
15. Edge S, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th ed. New York: Springer;2010.
16. Xiao W, Oefner PJ. Denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography: a review. Hum Mutat. 2001; 17:439–474.
Article
17. Keller G, Hartmann A, Mueller J, Höfler H. Denaturing high pressure liquid chromatography (DHPLC) for the analysis of somatic p53 mutations. Lab Invest. 2001; 81:1735–1737.
Article
18. Levrero M, De Laurenzi V, Costanzo A, Gong J, Wang JY, Melino G. The p53/p63/p73 family of transcription factors: overlapping and distinct functions. J Cell Sci. 2000; 113(Pt 10):1661–1670.
Article
19. Olivier M, Hainaut P. TP53 mutation patterns in breast cancers: searching for clues of environmental carcinogenesis. Semin Cancer Biol. 2001; 11:353–360.
Article
20. Berns EM, Foekens JA, Vossen R, Look MP, Devilee P, Henzen-Logmans SC, et al. Complete sequencing of TP53 predicts poor response to systemic therapy of advanced breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2000; 60:2155–2162.
21. Bull SB, Ozcelik H, Pinnaduwage D, Blackstein ME, Sutherland DA, Pritchard KI, et al. The combination of p53 mutation and neu/erbB-2 amplification is associated with poor survival in node-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22:86–96.
Article
22. Curtis C, Shah SP, Chin SF, Turashvili G, Rueda OM, Dunning MJ, et al. The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2,000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups. Nature. 2012; 486:346–352.
Article
23. Alsner J, Yilmaz M, Guldberg P, Hansen LL, Overgaard J. Heterogeneity in the clinical phenotype of TP53 mutations in breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2000; 6:3923–3931.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JBC
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr