J Breast Cancer.  2014 Jun;17(2):107-112.

The Educational Utility of Simulations in Teaching History and Physical Examination Skills in Diagnosing Breast Cancer: A Review of the Literature

• Simpson JS

Abstract

This paper is a review of the literature examining the use of medical simulations to teach our future healthcare providers how to diagnose breast cancer. MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched to identify the literature published between 1990 and 2014. In total, 113 articles were retrieved and evaluated for their relevance to the topic. Simulation methods, such as standardized patients and breast models were found to enhance students' abilities to perform patient histories and physical examinations to detect breast cancer. In addition, simulation can help trainees learn how to communicate bad news to patients effectively. There is an abundance of literature supporting the continued use of simulations in the curricula of medical schools. However, future studies based on sound theoretical frameworks are needed to evaluate the positive effects of simulation-based education on patient outcomes.

Keyword

Breast neoplasms; Models; Patient simulation; Standardized patients

MeSH Terms

Breast
Breast Neoplasms*
Curriculum
Education
Health Personnel
Humans
Patient Simulation
Physical Examination*
Schools, Medical

Reference

1. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005; 55:74–108.

2. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010; 127:2893–2917.

3. Rosen KR. The history of medical simulation. J Crit Care. 2008; 23:157–166.

4. Cooper JB, Taqueti VR. A brief history of the development of mannequin simulators for clinical education and training. Postgrad Med J. 2008; 84:563–570.

5. Brenner RJ. Breast cancer and malpractice: a guide to the physician. Semin Breast Dis. 1998; 1:3–14.

6. Vetto J, Pommier R, Schmidt W, Wachtel M, DuBois P, Jones M, et al. Use of the "triple test" for palpable breast lesions yields high diagnostic accuracy and cost savings. Am J Surg. 1995; 169:519–522.

7. Steinberg JL, Trudeau ME, Ryder DE, Fishell E, Chapman JA, McCready DR, et al. Combined fine-needle aspiration, physical examination and mammography in the diagnosis of palpable breast masses: their relation to outcome for women with primary breast cancer. Can J Surg. 1996; 39:302–311.

8. Gaffan J, Dacre J, Jones A. Educating undergraduate medical students about oncology: a literature review. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24:1932–1939.

9. Barrows HS. An overview of the uses of standardized patients for teaching and evaluating clinical skills. AAMC. Acad Med. 1993; 68:443–451.

10. Heard JK, Cantrell M, Presher L, Klimberg VS, San Pedro GS, Erwin DO. Using standardized patients to teach breast evaluation to sophomore medical students. J Cancer Educ. 1995; 10:191–194.

11. Deladisma AM, Gupta M, Kotranza A, Bittner JG 4th, Imam T, Swinson D, et al. A pilot study to integrate an immersive virtual patient with a breast complaint and breast examination simulator into a surgery clerkship. Am J Surg. 2009; 197:102–106.

12. Madan AK, Aliabadi-Wahle S, Babbo AM, Posner M, Beech DJ. Education of medical students in clinical breast examination during surgical clerkship. Am J Surg. 2002; 184:637–640.

13. Pilgrim C, Lannon C, Harris RP, Cogburn W, Fletcher SW. Improving clinical breast examination training in a medical school: a randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med. 1993; 8:685–688.

14. Gerling GJ, Weissman AM, Thomas GW, Dove EL. Effectiveness of a dynamic breast examination training model to improve clinical breast examination (CBE) skills. Cancer Detect Prev. 2003; 27:451–456.

15. Gerling GJ, Thomas GW. Augmented, pulsating tactile feedback facilitates simulator training of clinical breast examinations. Hum Factors. 2005; 47:670–681.

16. Sachdeva AK, Wolfson PJ, Blair PG, Gillum DR, Gracely EJ, Friedman M. Impact of a standardized patient intervention to teach breast and abdominal examination skills to third-year medical students at two institutions. Am J Surg. 1997; 173:320–325.

17. Campbell HS, McBean M, Mandin H, Bryant H. Teaching medical students how to perform a clinical breast examination. Acad Med. 1994; 69:993–995.

18. Schubart JR, Erdahl L, Smith JS Jr, Purichia H, Kauffman GL, Kass RB. Use of breast simulators compared with standardized patients in teaching the clinical breast examination to medical students. J Surg Educ. 2012; 69:416–422.

19. Colletti L, Gruppen L, Barclay M, Stern D. Teaching students to break bad news. Am J Surg. 2001; 182:20–23.

20. Rosenbaum ME, Kreiter C. Teaching delivery of bad news using experiential sessions with standardized patients. Teach Learn Med. 2002; 14:144–149.

21. Andrade AD, Bagri A, Zaw K, Roos BA, Ruiz JG. Avatar-mediated training in the delivery of bad news in a virtual world. J Palliat Med. 2010; 13:1415–1419.

22. Leeper-Majors K, Veale JR, Westbrook TS, Reed K. The effect of standardized patient feedback in teaching surgical residents informed consent: results of a pilot study. Curr Surg. 2003; 60:615–622.

23. Norman G. Data dredging, salami-slicing, and other successful strategies to ensure rejection: twelve tips on how to not get your paper published. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2014; 19:1–5.