J Korean Ophthalmol Soc.  2016 Aug;57(8):1254-1259. 10.3341/jkos.2016.57.8.1254.

Diagnostic Availability of Ultra-Wide-field Fundus Imaging in Korean Patient with Retinal Break

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 2Department of Ophthalmology, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea. eunjee95@nhimc.or.kr

Abstract

PURPOSE
To evaluate the availability of ultra-wide-field fundus photography compared to fundus examination after pupil dilatation in Korean patients with retinal break.
METHODS
For this retrospective case review of consecutive 160 patients, 230 lesions with retinal breaks were recruited. The ultra-wide-field images were taken after fundus examination with pupil dilatation performed by a retinal specialist. We analyzed ultra-wide-field images according to patient characteristics and separated area. We divided lesions into anterior and posterior areas, and each area was separated into 4 quadrants (superior, inferior, temporal, and nasal).
RESULTS
The sensitivity of ultra-wide-field imaging for detecting retinal break was 72% (95% confidence interval [CI] 65-79%), and the specificity was 94% (95% CI 90-98%). The sensitivity of detection of posterior retina was 89% (95% CI 85-93%), and that of anterior retina was 72% (95% CI 66-78%); this difference was significant (p = 0.007). There was a significant statistical difference at the inferior quadrant between anterior and posterior retina, but not at superior, temporal, or nasal quadrants. The sensitivity of detection in the inferior quadrant in the anterior retina was 43% (95% CI 29-57%).
CONCLUSIONS
Ultra-wide-field fundus photography can detect retinal break, but there is limitation in anterior retinal lesions, especially the inferior area. Therefore, ultra-wide-field fundus photography cannot be an alternative method instead of fundus examination with pupil dilatation.

Keyword

Optomap; Peripheral retina; Retinal break; Ultra-wide-field imaging

MeSH Terms

Dilatation
Humans
Methods
Photography
Pupil
Retina
Retinal Perforations*
Retinaldehyde*
Retrospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Specialization
Retinaldehyde

Cited by  1 articles

Ultra-wide Field Fundus Photography Using Eye Steering Technique in Patients with Symptomatic Posterior Vitreous Detachment
Min Han Kim, Jong-Hyun Oh
J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2018;59(12):1160-1165.    doi: 10.3341/jkos.2018.59.12.1160.


Reference

References

1. Walker HK, Hall WD, Hurst JW, et al. Clinical Methods: The History, Physical, and Laboratory Examinations. 3rd ed.Boston: Butterworths;1990. Chap. 117.
2. Neubauer AS, Kernt M, Haritoglou C, et al. Nonmydriatic abdominal for diabetic retinopathy by abdominalfield scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (Optomap). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008; 246:229–35.
3. Silva PS, Cavallerano JD, Sun JK, et al. Nonmydriatic ultrawide field retinal imaging compared with dilated standard 7-field 35-mm photography and retinal specialist examination for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012; 154:549–59.e2.
Article
4. Lee DH, Kim SS, Kim M, Koh HJ. Identifiable peripheral retinal lesions using abdominal field scanning laser ophthalmoscope and its usefulness in myopic patients. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2014; 55:1814–20.
5. Mackenzie PJ, Russell M, Ma PE, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of the optos optomap for detecting peripheral retinal lesions. Retina. 2007; 27:1119–24.
Article
6. Mudvari SS, Virasch VV, Singa RM, MacCumber MW. Ultrawide-field imaging for cytomegalovirus retinitis. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2010; 41:311–5.
Article
7. Chi Y, Guo C, Peng Y, et al. A prospective, observational study on the application of abdominalfield angiography in the evaluation and management of patients with anterior uveitis. PLoS One. 2015; 10:e0122749.
8. Khandhadia S, Madhusudhana KC, Kostakou A, et al. Use of Optomap for retinal screening within an eye casualty setting. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009; 93:52–5.
Article
9. Purbrick RM, Izadi S, Gupta A, Chong NV. Comparison of Optomap ultrawide-field imaging versus abdominal biomicroscopy for assessment of diabetic retinopathy in a real-life clinic. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014; 8:1413–7.
10. Chou B. Limitations of the Panoramic 200 Optomap. Optom Vis Sci. 2003; 80:671–2.
Article
11. Cheng SC, Yap MK, Goldschmidt E, et al. Use of the Optomap with lid retraction and its sensitivity and specificity. Clin Exp Optom. 2008; 91:373–8.
Article
12. Kim SD, Yang SW, Woo KI, et al. Anatomy of Orbit, Eyelid, and Lacrimal system. Korean Society of Ophthalmic Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 3rd ed.Goyang: Naewae Haksool;2015. Chap. 1.
Full Text Links
  • JKOS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr