Korean Circ J.  2016 Mar;46(2):161-168. 10.4070/kcj.2016.46.2.161.

Numbness after Transradial Cardiac Catheterization: the Results from a Nerve Conduction Study of the Superficial Radial Nerve

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Sejong General Hospital, Bucheon, Korea. sch.kimtaehoon@gmail.com
  • 2Department of Neurology, Inje University Seoul Paik Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Rehabilitation, Sejong General Hospital, Bucheon, Korea.
  • 4Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University Hospital, Incheon, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
Numbness on the hand occurs infrequently after a transradial cardiac catheterization (TRC). The symptom resembles that of neuropathy. We, therefore, investigated the prevalence, the predicting factors and the presence of neurological abnormalities of numbness, using a nerve conduction study (NCS).
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
From April to December 2013, all patients who underwent a TRC were prospectively enrolled. From among these, the patients who experienced numbness on the ipsilateral hand were instructed to describe their symptoms using a visual analogue scale; subsequently, NCSs were performed on these patients.
RESULTS
Of the total 479 patients in the study sample, numbness occurred in nine (1.8%) following the procedure. The NCS was performed for eight out of the nine patients, four (50%) of which had an abnormal NCS result at the superficial radial nerve. A larger sheath and history of myocardial infarction (p=0.14 and 0.08 respectively) tended towards the occurrence of numbness; however, only the use of size 7 French sheaths was an independent predictor for the occurrence of numbness (odds ratio: 5.50, 95% confidence interval: 1.06-28.58, p=0.042). The symptoms disappeared for all patients but one, within four months.
CONCLUSION
A transient injury of the superficial radial nerve could be one reason for numbness after a TRC. A large sheath size was an independent predictor of numbness; therefore, large sized sheaths should be used with caution when performing a TRC.

Keyword

Cardiac catheterization; Numbness; Superficial radial nerve lesion; Radial neuropathy

MeSH Terms

Cardiac Catheterization*
Cardiac Catheters*
Hand
Humans
Hypesthesia*
Myocardial Infarction
Neural Conduction*
Prevalence
Prospective Studies
Radial Nerve*
Radial Neuropathy

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Changes in the patients' mean and range of symptoms since the initial presentation, with a visual analogue scale (VAS).


Cited by  3 articles

Feasibility of Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention via Left Snuffbox Approach
Yongcheol Kim, Youngkeun Ahn, Inna Kim, Doo Hwan Lee, Min Chul Kim, Doo Sun Sim, Young Joon Hong, Ju Han Kim, Myung Ho Jeong
Korean Circ J. 2018;48(12):1120-1130.    doi: 10.4070/kcj.2018.0181.

Distal Radial Approach through the Anatomical Snuff Box for Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Jae-Hyung Roh, Jae-Hwan Lee
Korean Circ J. 2018;48(12):1131-1134.    doi: 10.4070/kcj.2018.0293.

The Transradial Approach for Coronary Intervention: More Comfort, Better Outcome
Cheol Whan Lee, Sang-Cheol Cho
Korean Circ J. 2018;48(8):728-730.    doi: 10.4070/kcj.2018.0118.


Reference

1. Campeau L. Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1989; 16:3–7.
2. Jolly SS, Amlani S, Hamon M, Yusuf S, Mehta SR. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J. 2009; 157:132–140.
3. Chase AJ, Fretz EB, Warburton WP, et al. Association of the arterial access site at angioplasty with transfusion and mortality: the M.O.R.T.A.L study (Mortality benefit Of Reduced Transfusion after percutaneous coronary intervention via the Arm or Leg). Heart. 2008; 94:1019–1025.
4. Rao SV, Cohen MG, Kandzari DE, Bertrand OF, Gilchrist IC. The transradial approach to percutaneous coronary intervention: historical perspective, current concepts, and future directions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 55:2187–2195.
5. Kanei Y, Kwan T, Nakra NC, et al. Transradial cardiac catheterization: a review of access site complications. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011; 78:840–846.
6. Cho EJ, Yang JH, Song YB. Type II complex regional pain syndrome of the hand resulting from repeated arterial punctures during transradial coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013; 82:E465–E468.
7. Braidwood AS. Superficial radial neuropathy. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1975; 57:380–383.
8. Levey AS, Eckardt KU, Tsukamoto Y, et al. Definition and classification of chronic kidney disease: a position statement from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO). Kidney Int. 2005; 67:2089–2100.
9. Ahmed B, Lischke S, De Sarno M, Holterman LA, Straight F, Dauerman HL. Gender related differences in predictors of vascular complications: role of vessel size and BMI. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2013; 36:84–90.
10. Velasco A, Ono C, Nugent K, Tarwater P, Kumar A. Ultrasonic evaluation of the radial artery diameter in a local population from Texas. J Invasive Cardiol. 2012; 24:339–341.
11. Pancholy SB, Sanghvi KA, Patel TM. Radial artery access technique evaluation trial: randomized comparison of Seldinger versus modified Seldinger technique for arterial access for transradial catheterization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012; 80:288–291.
12. Spindler HA, Felsenthal G. Radial sensory conduction in the hand. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1986; 67:821–823.
13. Park BK, Bun HR, Hwang M, Hong J, Kim DH. Medial and lateral branches of the superficial radial nerve: cadaver and nerve conduction studies. Clin Neurophysiol. 2010; 121:228–232.
14. Kanei Y, Kwan T, Nakra NC, et al. Transradial cardiac catheterization: a review of access site complications. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011; 78:840–846.
15. Cappellari AM, Bona AR, Lukasova K. Electrophysiological study of medial and lateral branches of the superficial radial nerve. Muscle Nerve. 2013; 47:105–107.
16. Papadimos TJ, Hofmann JP. Radial artery thrombosis, palmar arch systolic blood velocities, and chronic regional pain syndrome 1 following transradial cardiac catheterization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2002; 57:537–540.
17. Sasano N, Tsuda T, Sasano H, Ito S, Sobue K, Katsuya H. A case of complex regional pain syndrome type II after transradial coronary intervention. J Anesth. 2004; 18:310–312.
18. Saito S, Ikei H, Hosokawa G, Tanaka S. Influence of the ratio between radial artery inner diameter and sheath outer diameter on radial artery flow after transradial coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 1999; 46:173–178.
19. From AM, Gulati R, Prasad A, Rihal CS. Sheathless transradial intervention using standard guide catheters. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010; 76:911–916.
20. Caputo RP, Tremmel JA, Rao S, et al. Transradial arterial access for coronary and peripheral procedures: executive summary by the Transradial Committee of the SCAI. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011; 78:823–839.
21. Kiemeneij F. Prevention and management of radial artery spasm. J Invasive Cardiol. 2006; 18:159–160.
22. Uhlemann M, Möbius-Winkler S, Mende M, et al. The Leipzig prospective vascular ultrasound registry in radial artery catheterization: impact of sheath size on vascular complications. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012; 5:36–43.
23. Stella PR, Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Odekerken D, Slagboom T, van der Wieken R. Incidence and outcome of radial artery occlusion following transradial artery coronary angioplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1997; 40:156–158.
Full Text Links
  • KCJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr