J Korean Med Sci.
2015 Oct;30(10):1535-1536. 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.10.1535.
Predatory Publishing Practices Corrode the Credibility of Science
- Affiliations
-
- 1Department of International Medical Communications, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan. eb@dimc-tmu.jp
- KMID: 2344191
- DOI: http://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2015.30.10.1535
Abstract
- No abstract available.
Cited by 1 articles
-
Improving Scientific Writing Skills and Publishing Capacity by Developing University-Based Editing System and Writing Programs
Edward Barroga, Hiroshi Mitoma
J Korean Med Sci. 2019;34(1):. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e9.
Reference
-
1. Gasparyan AY, Yessirkepov M, Diyanova SN, Kitas GD. Publishing ethics and predatory practices: a dilemma for all stakeholders of science communication. J Korean Med Sci. 2015; 30:1010–1016.2. Caplan AL. The problem of publication-pollution denialism. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015; 90:565–566.3. Sorrell J, Owens J. Ethics: predatory publishing: keeping the wolves from your office door. OJIN. 2015; 20:DOI: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol20No03EthCol01.4. Barroga EF. Safeguarding the integrity of science communication by restraining 'rational cheating' in peer review. J Korean Med Sci. 2014; 29:1450–1452.5. Barroga EF. Essential modules for teaching publication writers. Med Writ. 2013; 22:4–9.
- Full Text Links
-
- Actions
-
Cited
- CITED
-
- Close
- Share
-
- Similar articles
-
- Dangerous Predatory Publishers Threaten Medical Research
- Publishing Ethics and Predatory Practices: A Dilemma for All Stakeholders of Science Communication
- The Pressure to Publish More and the Scope of Predatory Publishing Activities
- Manuscript Submission Invitations from ‘Predatory Journals’: What Should Authors Do?
- Open Access Publishing in India: Coverage, Relevance, and Future Perspectives
