J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc.  2010 Nov;49(6):593-603.

Validation Study of the Mental Health Recovery Measure

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Psychiatry, Naju National Hospital, Naju, Korea. wana1020@korea.kr

Abstract


OBJECTIVES
This study was conducted to verify the reliability and validity of the Mental Health Recovery Measure (MHRM), which was designed to provide a comprehensive assessment of the recovery process.
METHODS
A sample of 253 psychiatric patients were assessed using a package of measures, which comprised the MHRM, the Quality of Life Scale, the Empowerment Scale, the Ego-Resilience Scale, the Clinical Global Impression Scale and the General Assessment of Functioning. The reliability of the MHRM was evaluated in terms of its internal consistency and item-total correlations, and its validity was explored by factor analysis. A multiple regression analysis was conducted to examine the discriminant validity of the recovery factors.
RESULTS
The MHRM was found to be highly reliable in terms of internal consistency, and corrected item-total correlations r ranged from 0.49 to 0.75. The exploratory factor analysis revealed six factors, and the regression analysis indicated that the factors are measuring distinct features. In addition, various estimates of validity of MHRM were established with the criterion measures in conceptually expected ways.
CONCLUSION
These results offer the reliability and validity of the MHRM. The implications and limitations of this study were discussed, and future directions of study were suggested.

Keyword

Chronic mental disease; Mental health recovery; Reliability; Validity

MeSH Terms

Humans
Mental Health
Power (Psychology)
Quality of Life
Reproducibility of Results
Full Text Links
  • JKNA
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr