J Korean Ophthalmol Soc.  2014 Aug;55(8):1162-1166.

Risk Factors for Retinal Breaks in Patients with Symptom of Floaters

• Jeong SH
• Lee DW
• Cho HJ
• Yoo YJ
• Han JI
• Yoo SJ
• Cho SW
• Lee TG
• Kim CG
• Kim JW

Abstract

PURPOSE
To identify the risk factors of retinal breaks in patients with symptoms of floaters and to determine the associations between those risk factors and retinal breaks.
METHODS
A retrospective chart review of patients who visited with the symptom of vitreous floaters between July 2012 and October 2012 was performed. Patient information, such as age, sex, symptoms (e.g., multiple floaters and flashing), duration of symptoms, refractive error, and complete eye examination were recorded. The patients were divided into 2 groups: the control group had symptoms of floaters with no retinal breaks and the retinal breaks group had symptoms of floaters with retinal breaks. The chi-square test and univariate logistic regression were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 1744 eyes were examined in this study, including 1706 eyes in the control group and 38 eyes in the retinal breaks group. Univariate analysis revealed that patients with high myopia and multiple floaters showed increased risk of retinal breaks by 3.4 and 4.4 times, respectively, when compared to patients with a single floater alone. Lattice degeneration and vitreous or retinal hemorrhage increased the risk of retinal breaks by 10.8 and 37.5 times when compared to eyes that did not have lattice degeneration or vitreous or retinal hemorrhage. During the follow-up period after laser photocoagulation, a new retinal tear was found in 2 patients (2/38, 5.3%).
CONCLUSIONS
Vitreous or retinal hemorrhage, lattice degeneration, multiple floaters, and high myopia are risk factors of retinal breaks in patients with the symptom of floaters. Therefore, it is important for ophthalmologists to be aware of these risk factors and the patients at risk should be encouraged to attend follow-up examinations.

Keyword

Flashing; Lattice degeneration; Retinal tear; Vitreous floater; Vitreous hemorrhage

MeSH Terms

Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Light Coagulation
Logistic Models
Myopia
Refractive Errors
Retinal Hemorrhage
Retinal Perforations*
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors*
Vitreous Hemorrhage

Reference

References

1. Hollands H, Johnson D, Brox AC, et al. Acute-onset floaters and flashes: is this patient at risk for retinal detachment. JAMA. 2009; 302:2243–9.

2. Hikichi T, Hirokawa H, Kado M, et al. Comparison of the prevalence of posterior vitreous detachment in whites and Japanese. Ophthalmic Surg. 1995; 26:39–43.

3. Chuo JY, Lee TY, Hollands H, et al. Risk factors for posterior vitreous detachment: a case-control study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006; 142:931–7.

4. Byer NE. Natural history of posterior viterous detachment with early management as the premier line of defense against retinal detachment. Ophthalmology. 1994; 101:1503–13.

5. Boldrey EE. Risk of retinal tears in patients with vitreous floaters. Am J Ophthalmol. 1983; 96:783–7.

6. Murakami K, Jalkh AE, Avila MP, et al. Vitreous floaters. Ophthalmology. 1983; 90:1271–6.

7. Jeong G, Lee SH, Oum BS. Clinical research of the vitreous floaters. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1988; 29:303–8.

8. Hikichi T, Trempe CL. Relationship between floaters, light flashes, or both, and complications of posterior vitreous detachment. Am J Ophthalmol. 1994; 117:593–8.

9. Linder B. Acute posterior vitreous detachment and its retinal complications: a clinical biomicroscopic study. Acta Ophthalmol. 1966; 87:S1–108.

10. Tasman WS. Posterior vitreous detachment and peripheral retinal breaks. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1968; 72:217–24.

11. Jaffe NS. Complications of acute posterior vitreous detachment. Arch Ophthalmol. 1968; 79:568–71.

12. Tabotabo MM, Karp LA, Benson WE. Posterior vitreous detachment. Ann Ophthalmol. 1980; 12:59–61.

13. Novak MA, Welch RB. Complications of acute symptomatic posterior vitreous detachment. Am J Ophthalmol. 1984; 97:308–14.

14. Dayan MR, Jayamanne DG, Andrews RM, Griffiths PG. Flashes and floaters as predictors of vitreoretinal pathology: is follow-up necessary for posterior vitreous detachment. Eye (Lond). 1996; 10:456–8.

15. Richardson PS, Benson MT, Kirkby GR. The posterior vitreous detachment clinic: do new retinal breaks develop in the six weeks following an isolated symptomatic posterior vitreous detachment. Eye (Lond). 1999; 13:237–40.

16. Coffee RE, Westfall AC, Davis GH, et al. Symptomatic posterior vitreous detachment and the incidence of delayed retinal breaks: case series and meta-analysis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007; 144:409–13.

17. Sigelman J. Vitreous base classification of retinal tears: clinical application. Surv Ophthalmol. 1980; 25:59–70.

18. Boldrey EE. Relationship between floaters, light flashes, or both, and complications of posterior vitreous detachment. Am J Ophthalmol. 1994; 118:682–3.

19. van Overdam KA, Bettink-Remeijer MW, Mulder PG, van Meurs JC. Symptoms predictive for the later development of retinal breaks. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001; 119:1483–6.

20. van Overdam KA, Bettink-Remeijer MW, Klaver CC, et al. Symptoms and findings predictive for the development of new retinal breaks. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005; 123:479–84.

21. Sharma MC, Regillo CD, Shuler MF, et al. Determination ofthe incidence and clinical characteristics of subsequent retinal tears following treatment of the acute posterior vitreous detachment-related initial retinal tears. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004; 138:280–4.

22. Kanski JJ. Complications of acute posterior vitreous detachment. Am J Ophthalmol. 1975; 80:44–6.