J Korean Ophthalmol Soc.  2012 Jun;53(6):825-832.

The Predictability of Ocular Trauma Score and Prognostic Factors of Open Globe Injury

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea. sblee@cnu.ac.kr
  • 2Institute for Medical Sciences, Chungnam National University Research, Daejeon, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
To determine the prognostic factors of visual outcome in open globe injury and to assess the possibility of an ocular trauma score (OTS) model of predictive value in open globe injuries in Koreans.
METHODS
The medical records of 242 patients with open globe injury from 2000 to 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Prognostic factors of visual outcome, positive predictive rate, and negative predictive rate were surveyed.
RESULTS
In the multivariate analysis, old age, relative afferent pupillary defect, impaired initial visual acuity and retinal detachment were the worst predictive factors of vision survival. In OTS categories 1 and 2, worse final visual acuity was acquired, and positive predictive rate and negative predictive rate for assessment of final visual acuity less than 0.02 were 70.1% and 89.8%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
The prognostic factors of open globe injury associated with impaired final visual acuity were old age, relative afferent pupillary defect, worse initial visual acuity, retinal detachment and OTS categories 1 and 2. The OTS may have prognostic value in open globe injuries in Korean patients. However, identified prognostic factors of the present study did not entirely coincide with those of other Koreans or previous studies. Therefore, additional studies on the modified open globe injury as a prognostic model in Korean patients are needed.

Keyword

Globe rupture; Ocular Trauma Score; Prognostic factors

MeSH Terms

Humans
Medical Records
Multivariate Analysis
Pupil Disorders
Retinal Detachment
Retrospective Studies
Sulfonamides
Toluene
Vision, Ocular
Visual Acuity
Sulfonamides
Toluene

Reference

1. May DR, Kuhn FP, Morris RE, et al. The epidemiology of serious eye injuries from the United States Eye Injury Registry. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000. 238:153–157.
2. Pieramici DJ, Au Eong KG, Sternberg P Jr, Marsh MJ. The prognostic significance of a system for classifying mechanical injuries of the eye (globe) in open-globe injuries. J Trauma. 2003. 54:750–754.
3. Wong TY, Tielsch JM. A population-based study on the incidence of severe ocular trauma in Singapore. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999. 128:345–351.
4. Landen D, Baker D, LaPorte R, Thoft RA. Perforating eye injury in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. Am J Public Health. 1990. 80:1120–1122.
5. Négrel AD, Thylefors B. The global impact of eye injuries. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 1998. 5:143–169.
6. Esmaeli B, Elner SG, Schork MA, Elner VM. Visual outcome and ocular survival after penetrating trauma. A clinicopathologic study. Ophthalmology. 1995. 102:393–400.
7. Sternberg P Jr, de Juan E Jr, Michels RG, Auer C. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in penetrating ocular injuries. Am J Ophthalmol. 1984. 98:467–472.
8. de Juan E Jr, Sternberg P Jr, Michels RG. Penetrating ocular injuries. Types of injuries and visual results. Ophthalmology. 1983. 90:1318–1322.
9. Rahman I, Maino A, Devadason D, Leatherbarrow B. Open globe injuries: factors predictive of poor outcome. Eye (Lond). 2006. 20:1336–1341.
10. Dalma-Weiszhausz J, Quiroz-Mercado H, Morales-Canton V, et al. Vitrectomy for ocular trauma: a question of timing? Eur J Ophthalmol. 1996. 6:460–463.
11. Miyake Y, Ando F. Surgical results of vitrectomy in ocular trauma. Retina. 1983. 3:265–268.
12. Pieramici DJ, MacCumber MW, Humayun MU, et al. Open-globe injury. Update on types of injuries and visual results. Ophthalmology. 1996. 103:1798–1803.
13. Hutton WL, Fuller DG. Factors influencing final visual results in severely injured eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 1984. 97:715–722.
14. Punnonen E, Laatikainen L. Prognosis of perforating eye injuries with intraocular foreign bodies. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1989. 67:483–491.
15. Matthews GP, Das A, Brown S. Visual outcome and ocular survival in patients with retinal detachments secondary to open- or closed-globe injuries. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1998. 29:48–54.
16. Brinton GS, Aaberg TM, Reeser FH, et al. Surgical results in ocular trauma involving the posterior segment. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982. 93:271–278.
17. Martin DF, Meredith TA, Topping TM, et al. Perforating (through-and-through) injuries of the globe. surgical results with vitrectomy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991. 109:951–956.
18. Sternberg P Jr, de Juan E Jr, Michels RG. Penetrating ocular injuries in young patients. initial injuries and visual results. Retina. 1984. 4:5–8.
19. Barr CC. Prognostic factors in corneoscleral lacerations. Arch Ophthalmol. 1983. 101:919–924.
20. Groessl S, Nanda SK, Mieler WF. Assault-related penetrating ocular injury. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993. 116:26–33.
21. Kim JH, Yang SJ, Kim DS, et al. Fourteen-year review of open globe injuries in an urban Korean population. J Trauma. 2007. 62:746–749.
22. Kuhn F, Maisiak R, Mann L, et al. The Ocular Trauma Score (OTS). Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2002. 15:163–165.
23. Unal MH, Aydin A, Sonmez M, et al. Validation of the ocular trauma score for intraocular foreign bodies in deadly weaponrelated open-globe injuries. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2008. 39:121–124.
24. Sobaci G, Akin T, Erdem U, et al. Ocular trauma score in deadly weapon-related open-globe injuries. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006. 141:760–761.
25. Dosková H. Evaluation of results of the penetrating injuries with intraocular foreign body with the Ocular Trauma Score (OTS). Cesk Slov Oftalmol. 2006. 62:48–52.
26. Unver YB, Kapran Z, Acar N, Altan T. Ocular trauma score in open-globe injuries. J Trauma. 2009. 66:1030–1032.
27. Uysal Y, Mutlu FM, Sobaci G. Ocular Trauma Score in childhood open-globe injuries. J Trauma. 2008. 65:1284–1286.
28. Han SB, Yu HG. Visual outcome after open globe injury and its predictive factors in Korea. J Trauma. 2010. 69:E66–E72.
29. Kuhn F, Morris R, Witherspoon CD. Birmingham Eye Trauma Terminology (BETT): terminology and classification of mechanical eye injuries. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2002. 15:139–143.
30. Shock JP, Adams D. Long-term visual acuity result after penetrating and perforating ocular injuries. Am J Ophthalmol. 1985. 100:714–718.
31. Rofail M, Lee GA, O'Rourke P. Prognostic indicators for open globe injury. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2006. 34:783–786.
32. Schmidt GW, Broman AT, Hindman HB, Grant MP. Vision survival after open globe injury predicted by classification and regression tree analysis. Ophthalmology. 2008. 115:202–209.
33. Cruvinel Isaac DL, Ghanem VC, Nascimento MA, et al. Prognostic factors in open globe injuries. Ophthalmologica. 2003. 217:431–435.
Full Text Links
  • JKOS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr