J Korean Orthop Assoc.  2011 Oct;46(5):412-418.

Treatment of Periprosthetic Supracondylar Femur Fractures Following Total Knee Arthroplasty

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Wonkwang University, Institute of Wonkwang Medical Science, Iksan, Korea. cch@wonkwang.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Nursing School, Chodang University, Muan, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
This study examined the outcomes of treatment in periprosthetic supracondylar fractures of the femur after total knee arthroplasty with the plates of internal fixation and retrograde intramedullary nailing using clinical and radiological methods.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Between August 1998 to May 2010, 24 cases of periprosthetic supracondylar fractures of the femur around the stem were selected and 18 cases of a stabled fracture without a loosening of the stem were chosen. The mean age was 69.1 (range 55-83) years and the mean follow period was 42.8 (range 14-142) months. In 18 cases, 8 cases who used a plate to gain anatomical alignment were categorized as group A and 10 cases who used retrograde intramedullary nailing were called group B. The union period, range of motion before fracture and last follow up, HSS score and tibiofemoral angle in both groups were compared.
RESULTS
Radiographic union was obtained in all cases. The mean union period was 5 and 4.8 month in group A and B, respectively. In group A, the range of motion just before fracture was 120degrees and the last follow up was 93degrees. In group B, the range of motion before fracture was 124.5degrees and the last follow up was 96.8degrees. Although the range of motion in both groups had decreased appreciably (p<0.001), there was no significant difference between them (p>0.05). The HSS score in group A was 87 just before the fracture and decreased to 79.8. The HSS score in group B was 85 before fracture and decreased to 81. The final HSS score at the last follow up decreased in both groups but the decrease and difference between the two groups was not significant (p>0.05). The coronal alignment in group A was 6.2 valgus just before the fracture and 4.4 valgus at the last follow up. The coronal alignment in group B was 6 valgus before the fracture and 5.2 valgus at the last follow up (p>0.05).
CONCLUSION
In the treatment of periprosthetic supracondylar fractures of the femur after total knee arthroplasty, both an open reduction with internal fixation of the plates and retrograde intramedullary nailing showed good results in the clinical and radiological fields.

Keyword

total knee arthroplasty; periprosthetic supracondylar fracture

MeSH Terms

Arthroplasty
Femur
Follow-Up Studies
Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary
Knee
Range of Motion, Articular

Figure

  • Figure 1 (A) Preoperative X-rays of a Rorabeck type II periprosthetic supracondylar fracture of the left knee in a 71-year-old woman. (B) Radiograph taken at 5 months after plate fixation showed rigid bony union and well maintained prosthesis.

  • Figure 2 (A) Preoperative X-rays of a Rorabeck type II periprosthetic supracondylar fracture of the left knee in a 79-year-old woman. (B) Radiographs taken at 4 months after retrograde intramedullary nailing show rigid bony union and well maintained prosthesis.


Reference

1. Bogoch E, Hastings D, Gross A, Gschwend N. Supracondylar fractures of the femur adjacent to resurfacing and MacIntosh arthroplasties of the knee in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988. (229):213–220.
Article
2. Figgie MP, Goldberg VM, Figgie HE 3rd, Sobel M. The results of treatment of supracondylar fracture above total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1990. 5:267–276.
Article
3. Henry SL, Booth RE Jr. Management of supracondylar fractures above total knee prostheses. Tech Orthop. 1995. 9:243–252.
Article
4. Rorabeck CH, Taylor JW. Periprosthetic fractures of the femur complicating total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 1999. 30:265–277.
Article
5. Dennis DA. Periprosthetic fractures following total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2001. 50:379–389.
Article
6. DiGioia AM 3rd, Rubash HE. Periprosthetic fractures of the femur after total knee arthroplasty. A literature review and treatment algorithm. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991. (271):135–142.
7. Ritter MA, Stiver P. Supracondylar fracture in a patient with total knee arthroplasty. A case report. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985. (193):168–170.
8. Culp RW, Schmidt RG, Hanks G, Mak A, Esterhai JL Jr, Heppenstall RB. Supracondylar fracture of the femur following prosthetic knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987. (222):212–222.
Article
9. Cordeiro EN, Costa RC, Carazzato JG, Silva Jdos S. Periprosthetic fractures in patients with total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990. (252):182–189.
Article
10. Scott RD. Anterior femoral notching and ipsilateral supracondylar femur fracture in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1988. 3:381.
11. Aaron RK, Scott R. Supracondylar fracture of the femur after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987. (219):136–139.
Article
12. Cain PR, Rubash HE, Wissinger HA, McClain EJ. Periprosthetic femoral fractures following total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986. (208):205–214.
Article
13. Chen F, Mont MA, Bachner RS. Management of ipsilateral supracondylar femur fractures following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1994. 9:521–526.
Article
14. Bezwada HP, Neubauer P, Baker J, Israelite CL, Johanson NA. Periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004. 19:453–458.
Article
15. Tharani R, Nakasone C, Vince KG. Periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005. 20:4 Suppl 2. 27–32.
Article
16. Healy WL, Siliski JM, Incavo SJ. Operative treatment of distal femoral fractures proximal to total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993. 75:27–34.
Article
17. Zehntner MK, Ganz R. Internal fixation of supracondylar fractures after condylar total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993. (293):219–224.
Article
18. Russell GV Jr, Smith DG. Minimally invasive treatment of distal femur fractures: report of a technique. J Trauma. 1999. 47:799–801.
Article
19. Currall VA, Kulkarni M, Harries WJ. Retrograde nailing for supracondylar fracture around total knee replacement: a compatibility study using the Trigen supracondylar nail. Knee. 2007. 14:208–211.
Article
20. McLaren AC, Dupont JA, Schroeber DC. Open reduction internal fixation of supracondylar fractures above total knee arthroplasties using the intramedullary supracondylar rod. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994. (302):194–198.
Article
21. Rolston LR, Christ DJ, Halpern A, O'Connor PL, Ryan TG, Uggen WM. Treatment of supracondylar fractures of the femur proximal to a total knee arthroplasty. A report of four cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995. 77:924–931.
Article
22. Rolston LR, Christ DJ, Halpern A, O'Connor PL, Ryan TG, Uggen WM. Treatment of supracondylar fractures of the femur proximal to a total knee arthroplasty. A report of four cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995. 77:924–931.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKOA
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr