J Korean Soc Med Inform.  2009 Sep;15(3):285-292.

An Awareness Survey on the Protection and Use of Personal Health Information Focused on Applicants for Copies of the Medical Record

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Healthcare Management, Kwandong University, Korea. smart609@empal.com
  • 2Department of Medical Information, Dankook University Hospital, Korea.
  • 3Department of Pediatrics, Dankook University College of Medicine, Korea.
  • 4Department of Prevention Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Korea.

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
To supplement a previous study on the management of medical records with a view to preparing a system capable of ensuring basic patient rights regarding the protection of confidential medical information. The study objectives are to provide detailed guidelines to regulate the access and protection of medical information by analyzing patients' understanding and views regarding the dissemination of medical records.
METHODS
A self-administered questionnaire was administered to 781 patients who visited five University hospitals located in Seoul, Busan, Gyeonggi, Chungnam and Jeonnam from July to September, 2008 and asked for copies of medical records to be issued. Data were analyzed by using the statistical program SPSS 13.0.
RESULTS
More than 70% of respondents wanted to access their medical records after confirming the required documents. The highest distribution in the range of persons able to receive copies of medical records without the individual patient's consent or required documents was 'only personally' in each variable. Copies of medical records were issued mostly within 1 hour, while the appropriate time of issuing the copies was within one day. Half of respondents approved of a subscription system that did not require a doctor consultation. The results regarding changes in the ways to request/issue copies of medical records to improve the convenience for applicants differed significantly according to age.
CONCLUSION
Considering the sensitivity of personal health information, medical records should only be issued with the patient's consent and by confirming the identity of the designated person with required documents. Furthermore, people should be aware of the importance of protecting personal health information, and medical institutes should inform the requirements for bringing the relevant documents. Medical institutes play an important role in protecting personal records, which necessitates generalized guidelines.

Keyword

Personal Health Information; Medical Records; Consent; Required Documents

MeSH Terms

Academies and Institutes
Coat Protein Complex I
Surveys and Questionnaires
Hospitals, University
Humans
Medical Records
Patient Rights
Coat Protein Complex I

Reference

1. Lee KH, Choi EM. Theory of Hospital Management. 2002. 1st ed. Seoul: Shingwang Publisher;411.
2. Seok HT. Medical Agreement II. 1988. 1st ed. Seoul: Judicial administration;67.
3. Assembly Health and Welfare. 2003. 4.3(65507-275).
4. HIPAA Notice of Privacy Practices. Available at: http://www.nyhq.org.
5. University of Illinois Medical Center at Chicago: Management Policy and Procedure.:IM 4.01. 2005. 5.
6. University of Illinois Medical Center at Chicago. 2007. Available at: http://www.lamblawoffice.com/medical-records-copying-charges.html#Pennsylvania.
7. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Gaiho Guideline of Personal information protection for Medicine or nursing. Available at: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/seikatsu/kojin/index, http://www.mhlw.go.jp/shingi/2009.
8. Information and Privacy Commissioner/Ontario, Frequently Asked Questions: Health Information protection Act. Available at: www.ipc.on.ca.
9. Moon MM. Unpreparedness of the Required Documents and Related Factors When Issuing Copies of Medical Records-Focused on Tertiary Referral Hospital-. 2009. 02. Department of Public Health, Graduate School of Health Science Chosun University.
10. Report of Development of Information Protection and Security System. Center for interoperable EHR. 2007. 11. Available at: www.ehrkorea.org.
11. Guidance explaining significant aspects of the privacy rule. Office for Civil rights. 2002. 12. 04. Available at:www.hhs.gov/ocr/hipaa/privacy.html.
12. Gwen Hughes. Defining the Designated Record Set (AHIMA Practice Brief). Journal of AHIMA. 2003. 74(1):64A–64D.
13. Lee MS. Factors affecting the latent divorce intention among the women. Academy of Critical Social Welfare. 2006. 8(22):207–266.
14. Lee KJ, Byun WS, Kim HJ. A Comparative Study on the Family Consciousness Between Korea and Japan, -Centered on Seoul and Fukuoka Department-. 1992. Korean Women's Development Institute;50–51.
Full Text Links
  • JKSMI
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr