World J Mens Health.  2013 Apr;31(1):12-20.

Current Issues in Varicocele Management: a Review

• Choi WS
• Kim SW

Abstract

The most common cause of male infertility is varicocele, and varicocele is the most common correctable cause of male factor infertility. In this article we reviewed the concept of varicocele in terms of its diagnosis, method of treatment, indications for treatment, treatment outcomes, and prognostic factors. Physical examination is an essential diagnostic tool in the evaluation of a patient with a varicocele. However, as it depends on subjective findings, standardization of the physical examination method is needed. Various methods for treatment of varicocele exist, including open surgical, laparoscopic, microscopic surgical, and radiologic treatment such as embolization. Among these treatment approaches, microscopic inguinal or subinguinal varicocelectomy has superior outcomes, with a low complication rate. The influence of the treatment of varicocele on fertility is still a controversial issue and a difficult question to address, because there are limitations to performing a randomized control study, and previous studies had a heterogeneity of subjects and high dropout rate. However, there is robust evidence that varicocelectomy improves semen parameters as a surrogate marker of the potential for fertility. To date, general indications for treatment of varicocele are limited in patients with proven infertility, clinical palpable varicocele, and abnormal semen characteristics. Recently, it was shown that some symptoms other than infertility could be an indication for varicocelectomy because these symptoms are frequently related to deterioration of semen parameters. Varicocele in the adolescent presents a more difficult decision regarding whether to treat. A testicular size discrepancy of more than 20% is helpful for treatment decisions. Various prognostic factors were noted in several studies without, however, a consistent consensus.

Keyword

Varicocele; Infertility, male; Varicocelectomy

MeSH Terms

Adolescent
Biomarkers
Consensus
Fertility
Humans
Infertility
Infertility, Male
Male
Patient Dropouts
Physical Examination
Population Characteristics
Semen
Varicocele

Reference

1. Baazeem A, Belzile E, Ciampi A, Dohle G, Jarvi K, Salonia A, et al. Varicocele and male factor infertility treatment: a new meta-analysis and review of the role of varicocele repair. Eur Urol. 2011. 60:796–808.

2. Sabanegh E, Agarwal A. Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters CA, editors. Male infertility. Campbell-Walsh urology. 2012. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders;636–637.

3. World Health Organization. The influence of varicocele on parameters of fertility in a large group of men presenting to infertility clinics. Fertil Steril. 1992. 57:1289–1293.

4. Gorelick JI, Goldstein M. Loss of fertility in men with varicocele. Fertil Steril. 1993. 59:613–616.

5. Dubin L, Amelar RD. Etiologic factors in 1294 consecutive cases of male infertility. Fertil Steril. 1971. 22:469–474.

6. Male Infertility Best Practice Policy Committee of the American Urological Association. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Report on optimal evaluation of the infertile male. Fertil Steril. 2006. 86:S202–S209.

7. Dubin L, Amelar RD. Varicocele size and results of varicocelectomy in selected subfertile men with varicocele. Fertil Steril. 1970. 21:606–609.

8. Rowe PJ, Comhaire FH, Hargreave TB, Mahmoud AM. WHO manual for the standardized investigation, diagnosis and management of the infertile male. 2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

9. Carlsen E, Andersen AG, Buchreitz L, Jørgensen N, Magnus O, Matulevicuus V, et al. Inter-observer variation in the results of the clinical andrological examination including estimation of testicular size. Int J Androl. 2000. 23:248–253.

10. Hargreave TB, Liakatas J. Physical examination for varicocele. Br J Urol. 1991. 67:328.

11. Stahl P, Schlegel PN. Standardization and documentation of varicocele evaluation. Curr Opin Urol. 2011. 21:500–505.

12. Trum JW, Gubler FM, Laan R, van der Veen F. The value of palpation, varicoscreen contact thermography and colour Doppler ultrasound in the diagnosis of varicocele. Hum Reprod. 1996. 11:1232–1235.

13. Kocakoc E, Serhatlioglu S, Kiris A, Bozgeyik Z, Ozdemir H, Bodakci MN. Color Doppler sonographic evaluation of inter-relations between diameter, reflux and flow volume of testicular veins in varicocele. Eur J Radiol. 2003. 47:251–256.

14. Meacham RB, Townsend RR, Rademacher D, Drose JA. The incidence of varicoceles in the general population when evaluated by physical examination, gray scale sonography and color Doppler sonography. J Urol. 1994. 151:1535–1538.

15. Cina A, Minnetti M, Pirronti T, Vittoria Spampinato M, Canadè A, Oliva G, et al. Sonographic quantitative evaluation of scrotal veins in healthy subjects: normative values and implications for the diagnosis of varicocele. Eur Urol. 2006. 50:345–350.

16. Tanrikut C, Goldstein M, Rosoff JS, Lee RK, Nelson CJ, Mulhall JP. Varicocele as a risk factor for androgen deficiency and effect of repair. BJU Int. 2011. 108:1480–1484.

17. Zini A, Azhar R, Baazeem A, Gabriel MS. Effect of microsurgical varicocelectomy on human sperm chromatin and DNA integrity: a prospective trial. Int J Androl. 2011. 34:14–19.

18. Goldstein M. Wein A, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters C. Surgical management of male infertility. Campbell's urology. 2011. Vol 1:10th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, Co;648–687.

19. Palomo A. Radical cure of varicocele by a new technique; preliminary report. J Urol. 1949. 61:604–607.

20. Diegidio P, Jhaveri JK, Ghannam S, Pinkhasov R, Shabsigh R, Fisch H. Review of current varicocelectomy techniques and their outcomes. BJU Int. 2011. 108:1157–1172.

21. Bernardi R. Varicocele: results obtained with a personal technic in 500 cases. Rev Asoc Med Argent. 1958. 72:57–64.

22. Silber SJ. Microsurgical aspects of varicocele. Fertil Steril. 1979. 31:230–232.

23. Marmar JL, DeBenedictis TJ, Praiss D. The management of varicoceles by microdissection of the spermatic cord at the external inguinal ring. Fertil Steril. 1985. 43:583–588.

24. Goldstein M, Gilbert BR, Dicker AP, Dwosh J, Gnecco C. Microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy with delivery of the testis: an artery and lymphatic sparing technique. J Urol. 1992. 148:1808–1811.

25. Cayan S, Kadioglu TC, Tefekli A, Kadioglu A, Tellaloglu S. Comparison of results and complications of high ligation surgery and microsurgical high inguinal varicocelectomy in the treatment of varicocele. Urology. 2000. 55:750–754.

26. Szabo R, Kessler R. Hydrocele following internal spermatic vein ligation: a retrospective study and review of the literature. J Urol. 1984. 132:924–925.

27. Hopps CV, Lemer ML, Schlegel PN, Goldstein M. Intraoperative varicocele anatomy: a microscopic study of the inguinal versus subinguinal approach. J Urol. 2003. 170:2366–2370.

28. Aaberg RA, Vancaillie TG, Schuessler WW. Laparoscopic varicocele ligation: a new technique. Fertil Steril. 1991. 56:776–777.

29. Turek PJ, Lipshults LI. The varicocele controversies II. Diagnosis and treatment. AUA Update Series. 1995. 14:112–119.

30. Sze DY, Kao JS, Frisoli JK, McCallum SW, Kennedy WA 2nd, Razavi MK. Persistent and recurrent postsurgical varicoceles: venographic anatomy and treatment with N-butyl cyanoacrylate embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008. 19:539–545.

31. Evers JL, Collins JA, Vandekerckhove P. Surgery or embolisation for varicocele in subfertile men. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001. (1):CD000479.

32. Ficarra V, Cerruto MA, Liguori G, Mazzoni G, Minucci S, Tracia A, et al. Treatment of varicocele in subfertile men: The Cochrane review--a contrary opinion. Eur Urol. 2006. 49:258–263.

33. Marmar JL, Agarwal A, Prabakaran S, Agarwal R, Short RA, Benoff S, et al. Reassessing the value of varicocelectomy as a treatment for male subfertility with a new meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2007. 88:639–648.

34. Abdel-Meguid TA, Al-Sayyad A, Tayib A, Farsi HM. Does varicocele repair improve male infertility? An evidence-based perspective from a randomized, controlled trial. Eur Urol. 2011. 59:455–461.

35. Agarwal A, Deepinder F, Cocuzza M, Agarwal R, Short RA, Sabanegh E, et al. Efficacy of varicocelectomy in improving semen parameters: new meta-analytical approach. Urology. 2007. 70:532–538.

36. Boman JM, Libman J, Zini A. Microsurgical varicocelectomy for isolated asthenospermia. J Urol. 2008. 180:2129–2132.

37. Choi WS, Kim TB, Paick JS, Kim SW. Factors related to improvement or normalization of semen parameters after microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy. Korean J Urol. 2009. 50:39–45.

38. Cho SY, Kim TB, Ku JH, Paick JS, Kim SW. Beneficial effects of microsurgical varicocelectomy on semen parameters in patients who underwent surgery for causes other than infertility. Urology. 2011. 77:1107–1110.

39. Ford WC. Comments on the release of the 5th edition of the WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen. Asian J Androl. 2010. 12:59–63.

40. Caşkurlu T, Taşçi AI, Resim S, Sahinkanat T, Ekerbiçer H. Reliability of venous diameter in the diagnosis of subclinical varicocele. Urol Int. 2003. 71:83–86.

41. Yaman O, Ozdiler E, Anafarta K, Göğüş O. Effect of microsurgical subinguinal varicocele ligation to treat pain. Urology. 2000. 55:107–108.

42. Park HJ, Lee SS, Park NC. Predictors of pain resolution after varicocelectomy for painful varicocele. Asian J Androl. 2011. 13:754–758.

43. Altunoluk B, Soylemez H, Efe E, Malkoc O. Duration of preoperative scrotal pain may predict the success of microsurgical varicocelectomy. Int Braz J Urol. 2010. 36:55–59.

44. Zampieri N, Cervellione RM. Varicocele in adolescents: a 6-year longitudinal and followup observational study. J Urol. 2008. 180:4 Suppl. 1653–1656.

45. Diamond DA, Gargollo PC, Caldamone AA. Current management principles for adolescent varicocele. Fertil Steril. 2011. 96:1294–1298.

46. Park K, Cho SY, Kim SW. The surgical difficulty of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy is similar regardless of age. J Urol. 2011. 186:2397–2401.

47. Diamond DA, Zurakowski D, Bauer SB, Borer JG, Peters CA, Cilento BG Jr, et al. Relationship of varicocele grade and testicular hypotrophy to semen parameters in adolescents. J Urol. 2007. 178:1584–1588.

48. Mori MM, Bertolla RP, Fraietta R, Ortiz V, Cedenho AP. Does varicocele grade determine extent of alteration to spermatogenesis in adolescents? Fertil Steril. 2008. 90:1769–1773.

49. Kondo Y, Ishikawa T, Yamaguchi K, Fujisawa M. Predictors of improved seminal characteristics by varicocele repair. Andrologia. 2009. 41:20–23.

50. Rodriguez Peña M, Alescio L, Russell A, Lourenco da Cunha J, Alzu G, Bardoneschi E. Predictors of improved seminal parameters and fertility after varicocele repair in young adults. Andrologia. 2009. 41:277–281.