Sleep Med Psychophysiol.  2009 Dec;16(2):79-84.

Psychophysiological Characteristics of Chronic Pain Patients Measured by Biofeedback System

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Neuropsychiatry, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea. jeongdu@snu.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Neuropsychiatry, Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Stress and Biofeedback Clinic, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract


OBJECTIVES
Chronic pain is one of the most common experiences of humans and a typical psychophysiological disorder. The aim of this study was to measure the psychophysiological responses in chronic pain patients using a biofeedback system, and to compare them with the results from normal healthy subjects.
METHODS
Forty two patients with chronic pain (17 males and 25 females, average age 44.67+/-11.10 years) and 42 normal healthy controls (17 males and 25 females, average age 45.17+/-10.46 years) participated in this study. Electromyography (EMG), skin conductance (SC), and skin temperature (ST) were recorded using biofeedback system during the 3 phases (baseline, stress, and recovery) of stress reactivity test, and average values of them were calculated. Difference of values between two groups in each corresponding phase was analyzed with independent t-test, and change of values across phases of stress reactivity test was analyzed with paired t-test (all two-tailed, p<0.05).
RESULTS
Compared to normal controls, chronic pain patients had higher value of EMG (baseline : 8.10+/-5.97 micronV vs 4.72+/-1.52 micronV, t=-3.56, p<0.01 ; stress : 11.25+/-6.89 micronV vs 8.49+/-4.78 micronV, t=-2.13, p<0.05 ; recovery : 7.12+/-3.77 micronV vs 4.78+/-1.59 micronV, t= -3.70, p<0.01) and SC (baseline : 1.06+/-1.0 micronS vs 0.42+/-0.29 micronS, t=-4.0. p<0.01 ; stress : 1.87+/-2.05 micronS vs 1.03+/-0.86 micronS, t=-2.47, p<0.05 ; recovery : 1.74+/-1.77 micronS vs 0.64+/-0.59 micronS, t=-3.8, p<0.01) in all the 3 phases. But, skin temperature comparison did not reveal significant differences in all the 3 phases between two groups.
CONCLUSION
Psychophysiological responses of chronic pain patients in stress reactivity test were different from those of normal healthy controls. These results suggest that sympathetic nervous system is more activated in chronic pain patients.

Keyword

Chronic pain; Biofeedback; Psychophysiology

MeSH Terms

Biofeedback, Psychology
Chronic Pain
Electromyography
Female
Humans
Male
Psychophysiologic Disorders
Psychophysiology
Skin
Skin Temperature
Sympathetic Nervous System
Full Text Links
  • SMP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr