1. Kerekes K, Tronstad L. Long-term results of endodontic treatment performed with a standardized technique. J Endod. 1979; 5:83–90.
Article
2. Bystrom A, Happonen RP, Sjogren U, Sundqvist G. Healing of periapical lesions of pulpless teeth after endodontic treatment with controlled asepsis. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1987; 3:58–63.
Article
3. Ricucci D, Russo J, Rutberg M, Burleson JA, Spångberg LS. A prospective cohort study of endodontic treatments of 1,369 root canals: results after 5 years. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011; 112:825–842.
Article
4. Azim AA, Griggs JA, Huang GT. The Tennessee study: factors affecting treatment outcome and healing time following nonsurgical root canal treatment. Int Endod J. 2015; 01. 13. DOI:
10.1111/iej.12429.
Article
5. Pirani C, Chersoni S, Montebugnoli L, Prati C. Long-term outcome of non-surgical root canal treatment: a retrospective analysis. Odontology. 2015; 103:185–193.
Article
6. Evidenced-based review of clinical studies on non-surgical endodontic treatment. J Endod. 2009; 35:1139–1144.
7. Marquis VL, Dao T, Farzaneh M, Abitbol S, Friedman S. Treatment outcome in endodontics: the Toronto study. Phase III: initial treatment. J Endod. 2006; 32:299–306.
Article
8. Cujé J, Bargholz C, Hülsmann M. The outcome of retained instrument removal in a specialist practice. Int Endod J. 2010; 43:545–554.
Article
9. Imura N, Pinheiro ET, Gomes BP, Zaia AA, Ferraz CC, Souza-Filho FJ. The outcome of endodontic treatment: a retrospective study of 2000 cases performed by a specialist. J Endod. 2007; 33:1278–1282.
Article
10. Ng YL, Mann V, Rahbaran S, Lewsey J, Gulabivala K. Outcome of primary root canal treatment: systematic review of the literature - Part 2. Influence of clinical factors. Int Endod J. 2008; 41:6–31.
Article
11. Ng YL, Mann V, Gulabivala K. A prospective study of the factors affecting outcomes of nonsurgical root canal treatment: part 1: periapical health. Int Endod J. 2011; 44:583–609.
Article
12. Ng YL, Mann V, Rahbaran S, Lewsey J, Gulabivala K. Outcome of primary root canal treatment: systematic review of the literature - Part 1. Effects of study characteristics on probability of success. Int Endod J. 2007; 40:921–939.
Article
13. Dummer PM, Hicks R, Huws D. Clinical signs and symptoms in pulp disease. Int Endod J. 1980; 13:27–35.
Article
14. Jafarzadeh H, Abbott PV. Review of pulp sensibility tests. Part I: general information and thermal tests. Int Endod J. 2010; 43:738–762.
Article
15. Chueh LH, Chiang CP. Histology of irreversible pulpitis premolars treated with mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomy. Oper Dent. 2010; 35:370–374.
Article
16. Pettiette MT, Delano EO, Trope M. Evaluation of success rate of endodontic treatment performed by students with stainless-steel K-files and nickel-titanium hand files. J Endod. 2001; 27:124–127.
Article
17. Fleming CH, Litaker MS, Alley LW, Eleazer PD. Comparison of classic endodontic techniques versus contemporary techniques on endodontic treatment success. J Endod. 2010; 36:414–418.
Article
18. Hoskinson SE, Ng YL, Hoskinson AE, Moles DR, Gulabivala K. A retrospective comparison of outcome of root canal treatment using two different protocols. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002; 93:705–715.
Article
19. Waltimo TM, Boiesen J, Eriksen HM, Ørstavik D. Clinical performance of 3 endodontic sealers. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001; 92:89–92.
Article
20. Reid RJ, Abbott PV, McNamara JR, Heithersay GS. A five-year study of hydron root canal fillings. Int Endod J. 1992; 25:213–220.
21. Hommez GM, Coppens CR, De Moor RJ. Periapical health related to the quality of coronal restorations and root fillings. Int Endod J. 2002; 35:680–689.
Article
22. Trope M, Delano EO, Ørstavik D. Endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: single vs. multivisit treatment. J Endod. 1999; 25:345–350.
Article
23. Farzaneh M, Abitbol S, Lawrence HP, Friedman S. Treatment outcome in endodontics - the Toronto study. Phase II: initial treatment. J Endod. 2004; 30:302–309.
Article
24. van Zyl SP, Gulabivala K, Ng YL. Effect of customization of master gutta-percha cone on apical control of root filling using different techniques: an
ex vivo study. Int Endod J. 2005; 38:658–666.
Article
25. Koch M, Wolf E, Tegelberg Å, Petersson K. Effect of education intervention on the quality and long-term outcomes of root canal treatment in general practice. Int Endod J. 2015; 48:680–689.
Article
26. Siew K, Lee AH, Cheung GS. Treatment outcome of repaired root perforation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod. 2015; 41:1795–1804.
Article
27. Lee BN, Moon JW, Chang HS, Hwang IN, Oh WM, Hwang YC. A review of the regenerative endodontic treatment procedure. Restor Dent Endod. 2015; 40:179–187.
Article
28. Setzer FC, Kohli MR, Shah SB, Karabucak B, Kim S. Outcome of endodontic surgery: a meta-analysis of the literature-Part 2: comparison of endodontic microsurgical techniques with and without the use of higher magnification. J Endod. 2012; 38:1–10.
Article
29. Aguiar AC, de Meireles DA, Marques AA, Sponchiado Júnior EC, Garrido AD, Garcia Lda F. Effect of ultrasonic tip designs on intraradicular post removal. Restor Dent Endod. 2014; 39:265–269.
Article
30. Kwak SW, Moon YM, Yoo YJ, Baek SH, Lee W, Kim HC. Cutting efficiency of apical preparation using ultrasonic tips with microprojections: confocal laser scanning microscopy study. Restor Dent Endod. 2014; 39:276–281.
Article
31. Tsesis I, Rosen E, Tamse A, Taschieri S, Del Fabbro M. Effect of guided tissue regeneration on the outcome of surgical endodontic treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod. 2011; 37:1039–1045.
Article
32. Darvell BW, Wu RC. "MTA"-an hydraulic silicate cement: review update and setting reaction. Dent Mater. 2011; 27:407–422.
Article