Obstet Gynecol Sci.  2015 Jul;58(4):289-293. 10.5468/ogs.2015.58.4.289.

Public perception of "scarless" laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. khmd.kim@samsung.com

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
To investigate the public perception of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) according to the age group.
METHODS
An anonymous questionnaire about the desire for cosmesis and the preference for LESS in treatment of benign gynecologic diseases was provided to healthy volunteers (n=102). The survey participants were divided into two age groups (young women < or =40 years and middle-aged women >40 years). The desire for cosmesis was assessed using a validated scale, Body Image Scale.
RESULTS
All of the participants completed the questionnaire. The Body Image Scale scores were not different between the two age groups (11.5+/-3.5 vs. 11.8+/-4.0, P=0.656). The most common fear of surgery was the risk of complications in both age groups (69% in the young age group and 65% in the middle-aged group). Unless the operative risk increased, most of the participants (61% to 67%) in both age groups preferred LESS. Their choice was influenced by reduced scarring (43% to 61%), more safety (20% to 39%), reduced postoperative pain (8% to 10%), and new technology (4% to 6%).
CONCLUSION
Based on these results, there was no difference in the desire for cosmesis and perception of LESS according to the age. Therefore, physicians should discuss and consider LESS even in middle-aged women.

Keyword

Age; Cosmesis; Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery; Laparoscopy; Perception

MeSH Terms

Anonyms and Pseudonyms
Body Image
Cicatrix
Female
Genital Diseases, Female
Gynecology*
Healthy Volunteers
Humans
Laparoscopy
Pain, Postoperative

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Representative operative incision. (A) Conventional laparoscopic surgery and (B) laparoendoscopic single-site surgery.


Reference

1. Langebrekke A, Istre O, Hallqvist AC, Hartgill TW, Onsrud M. Comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy in patients with endometrial cancer. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2002; 9:152–157.
2. McMahon AJ, Russell IT, Baxter JN, Ross S, Anderson JR, Morran CG, et al. Laparoscopic versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: a randomised trial. Lancet. 1994; 343:135–138.
3. Tinelli R, Malzoni M, Cicinelli E, Fiaccavento A, Zaccoletti R, Barbieri F, et al. Is early stage endometrial cancer safely treated by laparoscopy? Complications of a multicenter study and review of recent literature. Surg Oncol. 2011; 20:80–87.
4. Kommu SS, Kaouk JH, Rane A. Laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery: preliminary advances in renal surgery. BJU Int. 2009; 103:1034–1037.
5. Bucher P, Ostermann S, Pugin F, Morel P. Female population perception of conventional laparoscopy, transumbilical LESS, and transvaginal NOTES for cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2011; 25:2308–2315.
6. Dunker MS, Stiggelbout AM, van Hogezand RA, Ringers J, Griffioen G, Bemelman WA. Cosmesis and body image after laparoscopic-assisted and open ileocolic resection for Crohns disease. Surg Endosc. 1998; 12:1334–1340.
7. Song T, Kim TJ, Cho J, Kim IR, Kang PN, Lee JW, et al. Cosmesis and body image after single-port access surgery for gynaecologic disease. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012; 52:465–469.
8. Autorino R, White WM, Gettman MT, Khalifeh A, De Sio M, Lima E, et al. Public perception of "scarless" surgery: a critical analysis of the literature. Urology. 2012; 80:495–502.
9. Fransen SA, Broeders E, Stassen L, Bouvy N. The voice of Holland: Dutch public and patient's opinion favours singleport laparoscopy. J Minim Access Surg. 2014; 10:119–125.
10. Goebel K, Goldberg JM. Women's preference of cosmetic results after gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014; 01-02. 21(1):64–67.
11. Ross SB, Hernandez JM, Sperry S, Morton CA, Vice M, Luberice K, et al. Public perception of LESS surgery and NOTES. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012; 16:344–355.
Full Text Links
  • OGS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr