Nutr Res Pract.  2016 Feb;10(1):108-114. 10.4162/nrp.2016.10.1.108.

Consumer perceptions on sustainable practices implemented in foodservice organizations in Korea

• Ju S
• Chang H

• KMID: 2313907
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4162/nrp.2016.10.1.108

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES
Sustainable practices in foodservice organizations including commercial and noncommercial ones are critical to ensure the protection of the environment for the future. With the rapid growth of the foodservice industry, wiser usage of input sources such as food, utilities, and single use packaging should be reconsidered for future generations. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the customer's perceptions on sustainable practices and to identify the relationship among sustainable practices, social contribution and purchase intention.
SUBJECTS/METHODS
The study was conducted using content analyses by reviewing articles on sustainable food service practices published domestically and abroad. Thereafter, data were collected with a face-to-face survey using a questionnaire and analyzed with factor analyses and multiple regressions.
RESULTS
Sustainable practices classified with factor analysis consisted of 6 dimensions of green food material procurement, sustainable food preparation, green packaging, preservation of energy, waste management, and public relations on green activity, with a total of 25 green activities in foodservice operations. Consumers were not very familiar with the green activities implemented in the foodservice unit, with the lowest awareness of "green food material procurement (2.46 out of 5 points)", and the highest awareness of "green packaging (3.74)" and "waste management (3.28). The factors influencing the perception of social contribution by foodservice organizations among 6 sustainable practice dimensions were found to be public relations on green activity (beta = 0.154), waste management (beta = 0.204) and sustainable food preparation (beta = 0.183). Green packaging (beta = 0.107) and the social contribution of the foodservice organization (beta = 0.761) had strong relationships with the image of the organization. The purchase intentions of customers was affected only by the foodservice image (beta = 0.775).
CONCLUSIONS
The results of this study suggest that sustainable practices by foodservice organization present a good image to customers and increase the awareness of valuable contributions that benefit the customer as well as the community.

Keyword

Sustainable practices; foodservice; purchase intention; Image; social contribution

MeSH Terms

Food Services
Intention
Korea*
Product Packaging
Public Relations
Social Responsibility
Waste Management

Reference

1. National Restaurant Association (US). National Restaurant Association [Internet]. Washington, D.C.: National Restaurant Association;2015. cited 2015 April 28. Available from: http://www.restaurant.org/home.

2. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (KR). Food and drug statistical yearbook [Internet]. Cheongju: Ministry of Food and Drug Safety;2014. cited 2015 April 30. Available from: http://www.mfds.go.kr/stat/index.jsp.

3. National Restaurant Association (US). Restaurant industry forecast [Internet]. Washington, D.C.: National Restaurant Association;2014. cited 2014 March 3. Available from: http://www.restaurant.org/News-Research/Research/Forecast-2014.

4. Food Dine Economic (KR). Sales on institutional foodservice markets: 2013.3.15 reports [Internet]. Seoul: Food Dine Economic;2013. cited 2015 August 27. Available from: http://www.foodbank.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=35373.

5. Food News (KR). Market scales of food industry and commercial foodservice industry: 2012.6.13 reports [Internet]. Seoul: Food News;2012. cited 2015 August 27. Available from: http://www.foodnews.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=40352.

6. World Commission on Environment and Development (US). Our Common Future. New York (NY): Oxford University Press;1987.

7. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [Internet]. Washingtion, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency;2014. cited 2014 March 5. Available from: http://www.epa.gov.

8. Gregoire MB. Foodservice Organizations: a Managerial and Systems Approach. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Pearson Education Inc.;2010. p. 22–24.

9. Green Restaurant Association (US). Certification standards [Internet]. Boston (MA): Green Restaurant Association;2014. cited 2015 March 15. Available from: http://www.dinegreen.com/restaurants/default.asp.

10. Kwak TK, Rye ES, Lee HS, Hong WS, Chang HJ, Choi JH, Lee NY. Foodservice Management. 4th ed. Seoul: Shinkwang Pub.;2014. p. 24–27.

11. Peregrin T. Sustainability in foodservice operations: an update. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012; 112:S12–S15.

12. Wang YF, Chen SP, Lee YC, Tsai CT. Developing green management standards for restaurants: an application of green supply chain management. Int J Hosp Manag. 2013; 34:263–273.

13. Chen CJ, Gregoire MB, Arendt S, Shelley MC. College and university dining services administrators' intention to adopt sustainable practices: results from US institutions. Int J Sustain High Educ. 2011; 12:145–162.

14. Dodds R, Kelman I, Thiesen N, McDougall A, Garcia J, Bessada T. Industry perspectives on carbon-offset programs in Canada and the United States. Sustain Sci Pract Policy. 2012; 8:31–41.

15. van Dooren C, Bosschaert T. Developing and disseminating a foodprint tool to raise awareness about healthy and environmentally conscious food choices. Sustain Sci Pract Policy. 2013; 9:70–82.

16. Feenstra G, Allen P, Hardesty S, Ohmart J, Perez J. Using a supply chain analysis to assess the sustainability of farm-to-institution programs. J Agric Food Syst Community Dev. 2011; 1:69–85.

17. Lehtinen U. Sustainability and local food procurement: a case study of finnish public catering. Br Food J. 2012; 114:1053–1071.

18. Reisch L, Eberle U, Lorek S. Sustainable food consumption: an overview of contemporary issues and policies. Sustain Sci Pract Policy. 2013; 9:7–25.

19. Kim YJ, Kim DJ. Consumers' intention to select eco-friendly restaurants by adopting extended theory of reasoned action. Foodserv Ind J. 2012; 8:45–62.

20. Yoo JY. A study on comparing and analyzing for green restaurant certification criteria. Int J Tour Hosp Res. 2014; 28:85–96.

21. Wilson ED, Garcia AC. 'Going Green' in food services: can health care adopt environmentally friendly practices? Can J Diet Pract Res. 2011; 72:43–47.

22. Chungnam National Research Institute (KR). Mitheyou standards [Internet]. Gongju: Chungnam National Research Institute;2015. cited 2015 March 1. Available from: http://www.meplusyou.or.kr/.

23. Jeong JH, Kim EJ, Kim MH, Choi MK. Perception of eco-friendly agricultural products and food service satisfaction of elementary and middle school students according to eco-friendly food service day in Chungnam. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr. 2013; 42:114–119.

24. Jung MH, Chang MJ, Kim SH. Perception of environment-friendly foods and satisfaction with school meals among students, their parents, and nutrition teachers at elementary schools in the Jindo area, Jeonnam. J Nutr Health. 2013; 46:369–381.

25. Dipietro RB, Cao Y, Partlow C. Green practices in upscale foodservice operations: customer perceptions and purchase intentions. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag. 2013; 25:779–796.

26. Hu HH, Parsa HG, Self J. The dynamics of green restaurant patronage. Cornell Hosp Q. 2010; 51:344–362.