Nutr Res Pract.  2007 Mar;1(1):46-51.

Evaluation of a theory-based community intervention to increase fruit and vegetable intakes of women with limited incomes

• Chung SJ
• Hoerr SL

Abstract

The study objectives were to increase both the stage of readiness to eat fruit and vegetables as well as the intakes of women who participated in the Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program (EFNEP) for families with limited incomes. The intervention was to enhance the currently used curriculum, Eating Right Is Basic III (ERIB3), with stage-specific processes based on the Trans-Theoretical Model of readiness to change. Trained EFNEP community workers taught the enhanced curriculum to 90 mothers in the experimental county and to 53 mothers in the control county. Pre- and post-intervention measures included stages of readiness to eat fruit and vegetables and to intake as assessed by 24-hour dietary recalls and staging questions. Most women recruited into EFNEP were in Action and Preparation Stages (53.5%). Fruit and vegetable intakes showed a linear trend along with the Stage of Change for fruit and vegetable. After intervention, some combination of the ERIB3 and the fruit and vegetables-enhanced ERIB3 resulted in a reported 1/2 servings/day increase in fruits and vegetables in both the control and the experimental counties, although changes were not significant. EFNEP women also moved along the Stage of Change Continuum for fruits and vegetables in both counties. The percentage of people who ate 5 or more servings of fruit and vegetables was significant, however, only in the experimental group. We encourage health professionals to apply lessons learned from this intervention and to continue to pursue theoretically based interventions to change dietary behaviors.

Keyword

Stage of change; fruit; vegetable; limited income; nutrition education

MeSH Terms

Curriculum
Eating
Education
Female
Fruit*
Health Occupations
Humans
Mothers
Vegetables*

Reference

1. Achterberg C, Miller C. Is one theory better than another in nutrition education? A viewpoint: more is better. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2004. 36:40–42.

2. Algert SJ, Agrawal A, Lewis DS. Disparities in access to fresh produce in low-income neighborhoods in Los Angeles. Am J Prev Med. 2006. 30:365–370.

3. Briefel RR, Johnson CL. Secular trends in dietary intake in the United States. Annu Rev Nutr. 2004. 24:401–431.

4. Bremner B, Campbell CC, Sobal J. Comparison of the beliefs and practices of EFNEP clients with staff perceptions of clients. J Nutr Educ. 1994. 26:123–130.

5. Conway JM, Ingwerson LA, Vinyard BT, Moshfegh AJ. Effectiveness of the US Department of Agriculture 5-step multiple pass method in assessing food intake in obese and nonobese women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003. 77:1171–1187.

6. Department of Health & Human Services. Healthy People 2010. 2000. 2nd ed. Washington DC, US: US Government Printing Office, USA.

7. Dietray Guidelines for Americans 2005. Department of Health & Human Services & Department of Agriculture. 2005. Accessed on 3/20/2007. www.healthierus.gov/dietaryguidelines.

8. Frazao E. The American diet, health and economic consequences (AIB-711). 1995. Washington. USA: Economic Research Service.

9. Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM, editors. Health Behavior and Health Education-Theory, Research and Practice. 2002. San Francisco. USA: Josey-Bass.

10. Glanz K, Patterson RE, Kristal AR, DiClemente CC, Heimendinger J, Linnan L, McLerran DF. Stage of change in adopting healthy diets: fat, fiber, and correlates of nutrient intake. Health Educ Q. 1994. 21:499–519.

11. Greaney ML, Less FD, Greene GW, Clark PG. What older adults find useful for maintaining health eating and exercise habits. J Nutr Elder. 2004. 24:19–35.

12. Greene GW, Fey-Yensan N, Padula C, Rossi S, Rossi JS, Clark PG. Differences in psychosocial variables by stage of change for fruits and vegetables in older adults. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004. 104:1236–1243.

13. Guenther PM, Dodd KW, Reedy J, Krebs-Smith SM. Most Americans eat much less than recommended amounts of fruits and vegetables. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006. 106:1371–1379.

14. Havas S, Anliker J, Damron D, Langenberg P, Ballesteros M, Feldman R. Final results of the Maryland WIC 5-A-Day Promotion Program. Am J Pub Health. 1998. 88:1161–1167.

15. Havas S, Anliker J, Greenberg D, Block G, Block T, Blik C, Langenberg P, DiClemente C. Final results of the Maryland WIC Food for Life Program. Prev Med. 2003. 37:406–416.

16. Henry H, Reimer K, Smith C, Reicks M. Associations of decisional balance, processes of change, and self-efficacy with stages of change for increased fruit and vegetable intake among low-income, African-American mothers. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006. 106:841–849.

17. Johnson DB, Beaudoin S, Smith LT, Beresford SA, LoGerfo JP. Increasing fruit and vegetable intake in homebound elders: the Seattle Senior Farmers' Market Nutrition Pilot Program. Prev Chronic Dis. 2004. 1:A03.

18. Kasila K, Poskiparta M, Karhila P, Kettunen T. Patients' readiness for dietary change at the beginning of counseling: a transtheoretical model-based assessment. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2003. 16:159–166.

19. Eating Right is Basic III, 1995. Michigan State University Extension. 2005. Accessed on 3/20/2007. http://www.fcs.msue.msu.edu/EFNEP/catalog/index.htm.

20. Nitzke S, Kritsch K, Boeckner L, Greene G, Hoerr S, Kattelmann K, Lohse B, Oakland MJ, Phillips B, White A. A stage-tailored multi-modal intervention increases fruit and vegetable intakes f low-income young adults. American Journal of Health Promotion. (in press).

21. New York State Cornell Cooperative Extension. EFNEP Guidelines Cornell Cooperative Extension. 1998. Ithaca. NY:

22. Theory at a Glance. National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute. 2005. 09. Accessed on 3/20/2007. http://cancer.gov/cancerinformation/theory-at-a-glance.

23. Perkins-Porras L, Cappuccio FP, Rink E, Hilton S, McKay C, Steptoe A. Does the effect of behavioral counseling on fruit and vegetable intake vary with stage of readiness to change? Prev Med. 2005. 40:314–320.

24. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Norcross JC. In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors. Am Psychol. 1992. 47:1102–1114.

25. Richards A, Kattelmann KK, Ren C. Motivating 18- to 24-year-olds to increase their fruit and vegetable consumption. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006. 106:1405–1411.

26. Serdula M, Coates R, Byers T, Mokdad A, Jewell S, Chavez N, Mares-Perlman J, Newcomb P, Ritenbaugh C, Treiber F, Block G. Evaluation of a brief telephone questionnaire to estimate fruit and vegetable consumption in diverse study populations. Epidemiology. 1993. 4:455–463.

27. Sporny LA, Contento IR. Stages of Change in dietary fat reduction: social psychological correlates. J Nutr Educ. 1995. 27:191–199.

28. Steptoe A, Perkins-Porras L, McKay C, Rink E, Hilton S, Cappuccio FP. Psychological factors associated with fruit and vegetable intake and with biomarkers in adults from a low-income neighborhood. Health Psychol. 2003. 22:148–155.

29. Subar AF, Heimendinger J, Patterson BH, Krebs-Smith SM, Pivonka E, Kessler R. Fruit and vegetable intake in the United States: The baseline survey of the Five a Day for better health program. Am J Health Promot. 1995. 9:352–360.

30. Van Duyn MA, Heimendinger J, Russek-Cohen E, DiClemente CC, Sims LS, Subar AF, Kreb-Smith SM, Pivonka E, Kahle LL. Use of the transtheoretical model of change to successfully predict fruit and vegetable consumption. J Nutr Educ. 1998. 30:371–380.

31. Wellman NS, Kamp B, Kirk-Sanchez NJ, Johnson PM. Eat better & move more: a community-based program designed to improve diets and increase physical activity among older Americans. Am J Public Health. 2007. 97:710–717.

32. Zenk SN, Schulz AJ, Hollis-Neely T, Campbell RT, Holmes N, Watkins G, Nwankwo R, Odoms-Young A. Fruit and vegetable intake in African Americans : income and store characteristics. Am J Prev Med. 2005. 29:1–9.