J Dent Anesth Pain Med.  2016 Mar;16(1):17-24. 10.17245/jdapm.2016.16.1.17.

Antimicrobial effect of topical local anesthetic spray on oral microflora

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Oral Microbiology Faculty of Dentistry Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • 2Department Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. natthamet.won@mahidol.ac.th

Abstract

BACKGROUND
To evaluate the antimicrobial activity of lidocaine (LD) topical anesthetic spray against oral microflora.
METHODS
Antimicrobial effects of 10% LD spray were assessed against six bacterial cultures obtained from volunteers: Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus salivarius, Streptococcus pyogenes, and Streptococcus sanguinis. The filter papers contained 50-µl LD, brain heart infusion (BHI) broth, or 0.2% chlorhexidine. Papers were placed on the cultured blood plates for 1-3 min. After the papers were removed, plates were incubated for 24 h. Bacterial growth on the contact areas was recorded as the antimicrobial score. The split mouth technique was use in for sample collection in clinical study. Filter papers soaked with either BHI broth or LD were placed on the right or left buccal mucosa for 1 min, and replaced with other papers to imprint biofilms onto the contact areas. Papers were placed on blood plates, incubated for 24 h, and antimicrobial scores were determined. Experiments were conducted for 2- and 3-min exposure times with a 1-day washout period.
RESULTS
LD exhibited bactericidal effects against E. coli, S. sanguinis, and S. salivarius within 1 min but displayed no effect against S. aureus, E. faecalis, and S. pyogenes. The antimicrobial effect of LD on oral microflora depended upon exposure time, similar to the results obtained from the clinical study (P < 0.05). LD showed 60-95% biofilm reduction on buccal mucosa.
CONCLUSIONS
Antimicrobial activity of 10% LD topical anesthetic spray was increased by exposure time. The 3 min application reduced oral microflora in the buccal mucosa.

Keyword

Antimicrobial effect; Lidocaine; Local anesthetic; Oral microflora

MeSH Terms

Biofilms
Brain
Chlorhexidine
Clinical Study
Enterococcus faecalis
Escherichia coli
Heart
Lidocaine
Mouth
Mouth Mucosa
Staphylococcus aureus
Streptococcus
Streptococcus pyogenes
Volunteers
Chlorhexidine
Lidocaine

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Antimicrobial effectiveness of 10% lidocaine against oral microflora collected from the buccal mucosa of 22 volunteers; exposure times of 1, 2, and 3 min. Antimicrobial score: 4 = >95% bacterial reduction, 3 = 60–95% bacterial reduction, 2 = 40–60% bacterial reduction, 1 = 5–40% bacterial reduction, 0 = <5% bacterial reduction.

  • Fig. 2 Representative results of antimicrobial effects of 10% lidocaine and 0.2% chlorhexidine against oral microflora collected from a volunteer; exposure time of 3 min.

  • Fig. 3 Antimicrobial effectiveness of 10% lidocaine against oral microflora from the buccal mucosa of 22 volunteers; exposure time of 1, 2, and 3 min. Antimicrobial score: 4 = >95% bacterial reduction, 3 = 60–95% bacterial reduction, 2 = 40–60% bacterial reduction, 1 = 5–40% bacterial reduction, 0 = <5% bacterial reduction.

  • Fig. 4 Representative results of antimicrobial effects of 10% lidocaine and 0.2% chlorhexidine against oral microflora from the buccal mucosa of 4 volunteers; exposure time of 3 min.


Reference

1. Erlich H. Bacteriologic studies and effects of anesthetic solutions on bronchial secretions during bronchoscopy. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1961; 84:414–421.
2. Kleinfeld J, Ellis PP. Inhibition of microorganisms by topical anaesthetics. Appl Microbiol. 1967; 15:1296–1298.
3. Kleinfeld J, Ellis PP. Effects of topical anesthetics on growth of microorganisms. Arch Ophthalmol. 1966; 76:712–715.
Article
4. Sculley PD, Dunley RE. Antimicrobial activity of a lidocaine preparation. Anesth Prog. 1980; 27:21–23.
Article
5. Morrow ME, Berry CW. Antimicrobial properties of topical anesthetic liquids containing lidocaine or benzocaine. Anesth Prog. 1988; 35:9–15.
Article
6. Feldman JM, Chapin-Robertson K, Turner J. Do agents for epidural analgesia have antimicrobial properties? Reg Anesth. 1994; 19:43–47.
Article
7. Berg JO, Mössner BK, Skov MN, Lauridsen J, Gottrup F, Kolmos HJ. Antibacterial properties of EMLA® and lidocaine in wound tissue biopsies for cultuting. Wound Repair Regen. 2006; 14:581–585.
Article
8. Pelz K, Wiedmann-Al-Ahmad M, Bogdan C, Otten JE. Analysis of the antimicrobial activity of local anaesthetics used for dental analgesia. J Med Microbiol. 2008; 57:88–94.
Article
9. Winther JE, Praphailong L. Antimicrobial effect of anesthetic sprays. Acta Odont Scand. 1969; 27:205–218.
Article
10. Mullin GS, Rubinfeld RS. The antibacterial activity of topical anesthetics. Cornea. 1997; 16:662–665.
Article
11. Aydin ON, Eyigor M, Aydin N. Antimicrobial activity of ropivacaine and other local anesthetics. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2001; 18:687–694.
Article
12. Kerenyi M, Batai MR, Juhasz V, Batai I. Lidocaine/prilocaine ointment (EMLA) has an antibacterial effect in vitro. J Hosp Infect. 2004; 56:75–76.
Article
13. Sedef Gocmen J, Buyukkocak U, Caglayan O. In vitro antibacterial effects of topical local anesthetics. J Dermatolog Treat. 2008; 19:351–353.
Article
14. Robert GJ, Simmons NB, Longhurst P, Hewitt PB. Bacteraemia following local anaesthetic injections in children. Br Dent J. 1998; 185:295–298.
Article
15. Parr AM, Zoutman DE, Davidson JS. Antimicrobial activity of lidicaine against bacteria associated with nosocomial wound infection. Ann Plast Surg. 1999; 43:239–245.
Article
16. Streitfeld MM, Zinner DD. Microbiological hazards of local dental anesthesia. Pilot study of involuntary aspiration of bacteria into hyperdermic needles and anesthetic cartridges after injection. J Am Dent Assoc. 1958; 57:657–664.
Article
17. Barbosa M, Carmona IT, Amaral B, Limeres J, Álvarez M, Cerqueira C, et al. General anesthesia increases the risk of bacteremia following dental extractions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010; 110:706–712.
18. Baltch AL, Pressman HL, Hammer MC, Sutphen NC, Smith RP, Shayegani M. Bacteremia following dental extractions in patients with and without penicillin prophylaxis. Am J Med Sci. 1982; 283:129–140.
19. Baltch AL, Schaffer C, Hammer MC, Sutphen NC, Smith RP, Shayegani M, et al. Bacteremia following dental cleaning in patients with and without penicillin prophylaxis. Am Heart J. 1982; 104:1335–1339.
Article
20. Schmidt RM, Rosenkranz HS. Antimicrobial activity of local anesthetic: lidocaine and procaine. J Infect Dis. 1970; 121:597–607.
Article
21. Silva MT, Sousa JC, PolÒonia JJ, Macedo PM. Effects of local anesthetics on bacterial cells. J Bacteriol. 1979; 137:461–468.
22. Fazly Bazaz BS, Salt WG. Local anesthetics as antimicrobial agents: structure-action considerations. Microbios. 1983; 37:45–64.
Full Text Links
  • JDAPM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr