Korean J Med Educ.
2012 Jun;24(2):117-125.
Analysis of the Relationship between Students' Seating Preferences and Academic Achievement in Medical School
- Affiliations
-
- 1Medical Education Department, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea.
- 2Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
- 3Department of Radiation Oncology, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea.
- 4Department of Anatomy, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea.
- 5Department of Education, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
- 6Medical Education Department and Department of Anesthesiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea. dckim@jbnu.ac.kr
Abstract
- PURPOSE
This study aimed to explore the relationship between students' seating preferences and academic achievement in medical school.
METHODS
The subjects of this study were 109 second-year students in C medical school. The pattern of seat selection of 109 students was surveyed by participant observation for 48 days, and a questionnaire was administered to determine the factors that were considered by students. Using SPSS version 12.0, we analyzed the factors that students considered with regard to seat selection and seat preference and the frequency of seat movements between areas. We performed one-way ANOVA to analyze the differences in academic achievement between students who moved seats versus those who did not.
RESULTS
The most common reasons for seat selection were to focus better on the lecture (60 students), to focus better on lecture, and to feel familiar with the same seat (60 students). Students' preferred seats were in rows A4, A7, A5, and A3 (in descending order), which are primarily the central sections, and columns B15, B1, B14, B19 (in descending order), which are primarily both ends of the division. The difference in academic achievement between students who moved seats and those who did not was not significant (p>0.05). Among students who did not move seats, the difference in academic achievement between 9 seating areas was not significant in 6 subjects (p>0.05).
CONCLUSION
The results of this study suggest that we should reconsider a professor's general perception regarding academic achievement according to seat location.