Korean J Med Educ.  2014 Mar;26(1):31-40.

Peer assessment of small-group presentations by medical students and its implications

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Family Medicine, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea. syoo@paik.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
  • 3Department of Medical Education, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
  • 4Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
  • 5Learning, Design, and Technology Program, The University of Georgia College of Education, Athens, GA, USA.

Abstract

PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to explore the relationships among medical students' assessments on peers' group presentations, instructors' assessments of those presentations, and students' educational achievements in other assignments and tests.
METHODS
A total of 101 first-year students from a medical school participated in the study. The students' educational achievements in a 4-week long integrated curriculum were analyzed. Student's final grades were comprised of the following education criteria: two written tests (60%), 15 group reports (25%), one individual report (7%), and four group presentations (15%). We compared scores of the group presentation assessed by the peers and the two instructors. Furthermore, we compared peers' assessment scores with each component of the evaluation criteria.
RESULTS
Pearson correlation analysis showed significant correlaton for the assessments between peers and instructors (r=0.775, p<0.001). Peer assessment scores also correlated significantly with scores for the group assignments (r=0.777, p<0.001), final grades on the curriculum (r=0.345, p<0.001), and scores for individual assignments (r=0.334, p<0.001); however, no significant correlation was observed between the peer-assessed group presentation scores and the two written test scores.
CONCLUSION
Peer assessments may be a reliable and valid method for evaluating medical students' performances in an integrated curriculum, especially if the assessments are used to academic processes, such as presentations, with explicit evaluation and judgment criteria. Peer assessments on group presentations might assess different learning domains compared to written tests that primarily evaluate limited medical knowledge and clinical reasoning.

Keyword

Peer review; Self-evaluation programs; Teaching; Group processes

MeSH Terms

Curriculum
Education
Educational Status
Group Processes
Humans
Judgment
Learning
Methods
Peer Review
Schools, Medical
Self-Evaluation Programs
Students, Medical*
Full Text Links
  • KJME
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr