Korean J Med.  2009 Apr;76(4):434-442.

Assessing stent restenosis using 64-multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Korea. jyhwang@gnu.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Korea. knjeon@gnu.ac.kr
  • 3Department of Gyeongsang Institute of Health, College of Medicine, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS
Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is considered to be a noninvasive, alternative method for evaluating stent restenosis. However, the diagnostic accuracy of 16-channel MDCT for stent stenosis is reported to have severe limitations because of high-attenuation stent-related artifacts. 64-channel MDCT, which recently became available in clinical practice, has better spatial and temporal resolution than 16-channel MDCT. The diagnostic accuracy of 64-channel MDCT for stent restenosis (in-segment and in-stent) was assessed by comparing it with conventional coronary angiography.
METHODS
In-segment and in-stent restenosis (> or =50% in diameter) were evaluated in 96 stent segments in 68 patients [61+/-12 years, 51 (75%) male] using both 64-channel MDCT and conventional coronary angiography. The in-stent analysis was confined to the portion of the artery covered by the stent and the in-segment analysis included the stent and 5 mm proximal or distal to the stent edges.
RESULTS
The 64-channel MDCT could evaluate stent restenosis in 93 of 96 (97%) stent segments. Quantitative conventional coronary angiography found in-segment restenosis (> or =50% in diameter) in 16 of 68 (23%) patients and 16 of 96 (17%) segments. For the patients with interpretable stent segments, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 64-channel MDCT for in-segment restenosis per patient were 63, 96, 83, and 89%, respectively; per segment they were 63, 97, 83, and 93%, respectively; and for in-stent restenosis per stent they were 82, 98, 82, and 98%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
The diagnostic accuracy of 64-channel MDCT for assessing stent restenosis had high specificity and negative predictive value in the clinical setting. The 64-channel MDCT may be a promising, less-invasive imaging tool for stent restenosis, especially for the purpose of excluding stent restenosis.

Keyword

Coronary restenosis; Computed tomography

MeSH Terms

Arteries
Artifacts
Constriction, Pathologic
Coronary Angiography
Coronary Restenosis
Humans
Multidetector Computed Tomography
Sensitivity and Specificity
Stents
Full Text Links
  • KJM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr